Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fix the Broken IRS Code

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 06:46 PM
Original message
Fix the Broken IRS Code
http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/?p=3087

I’m no accountant, but I know that the IRS code is filthy with loopholes to enable the uber-rich to evade their fair share of taxes. What I did not know is that they are the ones who benefit most from tax relief that is ostensibly for the poor and middle classes. That stinks!

IF YOU WERE spending $400 billion a year on social programs, would you give half of that to the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans? We didn’t think so. But that is the perverse result of the stealthy spending conducted through the federal tax code. The code is salted with "tax expenditures" — programs, many worthy, designed to promote policies from homeownership to education to retirement savings. There are two problems with this approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. About half of this country
pays no income tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe because the other half has most of the money? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why are those that make millions by NOT WORKING assessed...
...a lower rate than someone making $30K working his or her tush off? Capital gains tax rates need to be in the equation, not just payroll taxes.

And how about the Paris Hilton Tax Relief Act? Don't the maids who cleaned all those hotel rooms deserve just a little bit of Paris's pie? Couldn't she squeeze by on maybe just 5 or 6 Billion dollars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Do you have any Idea who wrote the IRS code?
It's congress and good luck on getting congress to make the code better, much less simpler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They tried in 1986
Supposedly, deductions were traded off for rate reductions. Unfortunately in the last minute haggling over keeping it revenue neutral a lot of complication crept back in.

What i liked was the senator who gave this philosophy on taxes, loopholes, and deductions and the contortions his colleagues were going through:

"Don't tax you. Don't tax me. Tax the other fellow behind the tree."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. .... "because he stole the whiskey, I stole the wine, and all I ever do is the double-time"?
Edited on Tue Oct-12-10 08:30 PM by Statistical
Not sure why but the combination of your avatar and your quote made me think of "MP MP". Not sure if that was intentional.

Ok end of the thread hijack back to your regularly scheduled thread already in progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. The IRS code is the way it is because nobody wants to give up their deduction/exemption/credit.
Everyone just wants the other persons exemption to go away.

No reason that 99% of the deductions/exemptions/credits couldn't go away.

A single per person exemption and then taxed in progressive structure.

Only extreme situations would warrant a deduction. However most people would rebel if their favorite deduction was on the chopping block.

I would eliminate all of them in favor of larger exemption and more progressive rate structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC