Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California: Jerry Brown vs Meg Whiteman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:51 PM
Original message
California: Jerry Brown vs Meg Whiteman
Edited on Thu Oct-14-10 08:00 PM by Xicano
Hi everyone, thought to post this article I saw posted in my union dispatch hall today. I am not the author, nor do I know who is. I just thought it was a good read and that my friends at the DU would appreciate it too.



By Unknown:

Few will remember why Jerry Brown was elected governor back in the 1970's, as most of the current California electorate either wasn't born yet or has immigrated here since that time. Those were the halcyon days of the post-Vietnam War, Watergate and college student uprisings. Governor Jerry was the antidote to everything wrong that Ronald Reagan stood for. Reagan represented The Man who tear-gassed the students at UC Berkeley's People's Park and was famously quoted for his anti-environmentalist statement, "If you've seen one redwood you've seen them all."

Jerry was our man. He represented our generation's distain for everything Vietnam, Nixon and Reagan stood for while outlining a new vision for our future. It was a vision that would not be completed.

He talked about green energy, before we really knew what it was, and then he funded the first solar energy farm out in the Mojave dessert that is still functioning today. He, of course, was derided in the press for his prescient vision that one day we would be talking on telephones connected to satellites, which earned him the nickname "Gov. Moon Beam." But who among us today hasn't adopted the use of a cell phone? And then there was the invasion of the Med-fly.

As the environmental governor, Brown was confronted with the invasion of the Mediterranean fruit fly, a threat to this state's billion-dollar agriculture business. He had the option of aerial spraying vast sections of urban California with malathion, or using less invasive methods to fight the infestation. He rightly chose to use the later tactic, using ground dusting and on-site spraying with the use of the release of sterilized Med-flies, imported from Chile.

His credentials as the pro-environmental governor were on the line and his efforts were basically sabotaged. First, several millions of "sterilized" Med-flies were released and then were discovered not to be sterilized! This exacerbated the situation and undermined his already contentious decision not to do aerial spraying. Brown eventually caved in to the Fed and was forced to contract with a helicopter outfit that only later was revealed to be connected to the infamous CIA shadow corporation Air America.

In short, Brown got screwed, losing all credibility with his green, Sierra Club-type supporters and many younger voters at the same time. I always considered this a political "set-up" or character assassination. Some might call it a conspiracy. But let's just settle it by saying "it wasn't an accident!"

But this is the past and Jerry has moved on, grown up --aged you might say-- and gotten a bit wiser to the ways of political sabotage and right wing baiting.

Most politicians with less experience would have collapsed this last summer from the heat of Meg Whitman's self-financed $119 million attack campaign, but Brown didn't. He stood his ground and waited, even against all the hysterical advice to fight back early. Clearly, Jerry Brown has learned a few things since his early days as the "youngest governor." But does any of this qualify him to lead California out of its current crisis?

Compared to Whiteman, probably yes. We've just suffered through six years of a governor who was too wealthy to need the job, who was too inexperienced in either state or party politics to do the job, and who basically told us that he was going to run our government like a business. Well, that hasn't worked out so well. We are still running state budget deficits of $19 billion a year and he can't even convince his Republican minority party to compromise on passing a budget. Meg, with all of her eBay/Silicon Valley savoir-faire isn't saying anything better than what Schwarzenegger promised when he deposed Gov. Gray Davis.

What is undiscussed in the the mainstream media is that running a for-profit business is fundamentally different than running a not-for-profit government. Does anyone remember opening up our state regulated energy supply to the free marketeers like Enron? But let's just ask this one question: why would any California voter trust someone running for the state's highest office who hasn't even voted for the past 20 years?

Democracy belongs to those who show up and if you don't show up at one election you can be forgiven--but for 20 years? Come on! Everyone has the right to complain about the government we've got, but if you don't show up to vote for this long, save your breath for singing in the shower because nobody really wants to hear you.

So, Jerry Brown is not the perfect candidate, but in my estimation, California kind of owes him a shot at finishing what he started 30 years ago, because A) we've finally caught up to where he was then, B) his policies were previously ambushed by political forces now exposed and discredited and C) in a crisis, you hire the one who has the relevant experience, and he does.

I am personally not impressed with the current set of amateur politicians who want to start at the top simply because they have the money -- show me what you've actually done for somebody other than yourself before you get paid to represent everybody in my state!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent;
I was an adult in those days, but didn't know all that history, especially how he got his nick-name, gov. Moonbeam. He's a good man, has the right vision, but hope California is not too far gone to bring back as wonderful as it used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was there, Mr Brown was an excellent governor, like his father.
The media ridiculed him the whole time, calling him "Governor Moonbeam" and other disrespectful things. He left a surplus, he supported Prop 6 and opposed Prop 13, he favored environmental responsibility and good government, and was savaged for it. If anybody deserves another shot, he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was so proud and excited to vote for Jerry Brown when I was a...
young housewife. I am just as proud to have voted for Jerry Brown (absentee ballot) as a grandmother.


Tikki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. My first vote at age 18 was for Jerry!!
And looking forward to Nov 2 and having him as Gov again. He was really a great governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. My first vote was for Brown too when he
ran for re-election, he was the first Democrat I ever voted for. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. yeah!! Me too, his second time around
Hey fellow baby-boomer!! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I worked on Brown's local Prez campaign,,,
... back in 1991-2, since my wife (a bit older than me) was familiar with his gubernatorial experience and vision. I've still got the t-shirt, and I even got to meet him (sorta). Anyway, I'm very glad to see he's back in the saddle. I hope California can get him elected. The OP quotes a really well-written opinion for why Golden Staters should vote for him. So, Golden Staters... vote for him!!!

Go, Jerry!

----------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Schwarzennegger also pushed the idea he would run California
like a business. It was supposedly his business accumen
that put him in office. He does not seem to have been too
successful. What makes Meg think running it like a business
is the answer.

Psst, Meg, Government was never meant to be run like a business.

Oh well, Jerry is ahead and I pray he stays there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. RIGHT? "i'm rich so it's not possible to corrupt me?"
WHO THE FUCK WOULD BELIEVE THAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. LOL That is one ridiculous comment isn't it?
Like a fox saying: "I've eaten a lot of chickens in my life so it's no possible to corrupt me with a chicken"

:crazy:



Peace,
Xicano
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Love the last line!!! k/r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. He was my Gov when I was a California kid
Good times, good times, and then that fuckwit Reagan came back ... :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. all California has is amateur politicians because we voted in a system that encourages it
If you want career politicians you need to scale back on term limits or else Californians future is amateur politicians. We're just lucky this time one of the last career state politicians is still alive to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yup those idiotic term limits
keep people from getting experience as office holders as they try to work their way up. Because of that we're left with people holding office who "don't know their ass from a hole in the ground" as my mother liked to say. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC