Cattledog
(695 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:47 PM
Original message |
Dems set to lose 50 seats! |
pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
1. "But May Understate Uncertainty" |
BzaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yeah. We could lose 75 seats, or only 25. That doesn't provide us very good news. n/t |
pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
17. Maintaining control would be good in this environment |
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message |
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. as in loose as a goose, loose with your money. . . |
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
As in: "You win some, you loose some."
|
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. you don't loose some, but you might loosen your belt. |
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Not what the article says. It says the consensus is at 50, but includes a lot of uncertainty |
|
Dems are going to lose seats in the House and the Senate. The odds for this happening is very very low. But is it , 20 30,40,50, 60, 70 or 80 is what experts dont know because of the uncertainties in the model.
|
Cirque du So-What
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Good reason to get out the vote! |
|
Make the victories too lopsided for the repugs to steal.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I have a feeling a lot of folks will need to develop a taste for crow... |
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Historically we should lose 25 seats simply for being in power. |
|
So 25 more is not that bad.
|
pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. What's the least the incumbent party has lost in the past? |
Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Pugs gained in 2002. I think we gained in 1998. |
quiller4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
8. He is counting on at least 1 R pick up in Washington and I |
|
don't think that is likely to happen. Larson and Smith have pulled above 50% and lead by 6 and 8 point margins. (WA 2 and WA 9)Herrera gave a really poor debate performance last week and private polling shows that race (WA 3) within the margin or error. Heck is campaigning harder and I think he'll pull that out. Cloud isn't anywhere close to Dicks in WA 6. The gap between Reichert and DelBene (WA 8)is also now within margin of error and the momentum is going DelBene's way. I don't think we'll know the results of this race on election night but DelBene has a shot especially since Reichert is almost absent from the campaign and she has a massive phone and doorbelling effort underway this weekend. Most voters got their ballots today.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There are a lot more of us than there are teabaggers.
|
pstokely
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message |
12. They've already lost according the media |
|
Don't even bother to vote :sarcasm:
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I'm looking at our local race and I have to admit the D in my congressional race has shitty ads. |
|
I love my Senator's commercials the best. It's not just about money it's mostly about production and message.
|
TheCowsCameHome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message |
Sheepshank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-16-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
19. "However, there is considerable uncertainty in the forecast " |
|
The article is caveat after caveat (including the cell phone issue) of why they may be off in the prediction. What a joke!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 02:34 AM
Response to Original message |