Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will the Democrats get rid of the filibuster?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pgodbold Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:28 PM
Original message
Poll question: Will the Democrats get rid of the filibuster?
Edited on Sun Oct-17-10 08:11 PM by pgodbold
This poll assumes the Democrats will hold at least 50 senate seats and so are able, by a simple majority, to kill the filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why won't they make them actually fillibuster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. how about lower the number of Senators needed to break the Filibuster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. lol?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yea sure, get rid of it..
To do so, "assuames" that we Democrats will be a majority, forever....

I know many are in favor of just "getting rid of it" but, what about when the Repukes are in power??

Will you still support "getting rid of it then"??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgodbold Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. we tend to compromise with them anyways.. so getting rid of it would hurt us less
than it would them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I guaran-damn-tee you the first thing the Republicans will do when they have a majority again is get
...rid of the filibuster. Dems hanging onto it as a hedge against this boogeyman is worthless and counterproductive. Had we changed the rules a while back, we'd have passed some effective legislation that would have us in a far better position to retain our majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am still against removing the filibuster. Maybe refining it but not removing it
Because we have prevented more activist judges from being seated thanks to the filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Fear of what the other side could do should never prevent us from doing something to help our causes
Think of how much we could have actually accomplished without a filibuster. The filibuster has helped create the electoral nightmare we now face. Sure we may love the filibuster when the Rs are in control; but we cannot govern through fear and negativity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgodbold Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Hmm... the supremes have never been so far right. If it helped it sure didn't help much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. It's not just for the Supreme Court
There was at least a dozen bush nominees that got filibustered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Need to return to the real filibuster.
The one where folks are required to constantly talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-17-10 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Republicans will fillibuster to prevent changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC