Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 01:14 PM
Original message |
|
sounds like a win for the banks. :shrug:
|
taught_me_patience
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's a win for most of us |
|
It allows banks to spread risk. This enables an incredibly low credit spread between 30 year treasury bonds and 30 year mortgages. Almost all homeowners have benefited from these lower interest rates.
|
taught_me_patience
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Were you talking about securitized mortgages or securities lending? |
Greyhound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It is monetizing the "bank" losses we're on the hook for, which removes the last shreds |
|
of responsibility for the thieves that crashed the economy.
Oh, and it doesn't get one penny of our money back from them.
|
Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-18-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
from NYT
Here is the deal: Funds lend some of their stocks and bonds to Wall Street, in return for cash that banks like JPMorgan then invest. If the trades do well, the bank takes a cut of the profits. If the trades do poorly, the funds absorb all of the losses.
The strategy is called securities lending, a practice that is thriving even though some investments linked to it were virtually wiped out during the financial panic of 2008. These trades were supposed to be safe enough to make a little extra money at little risk.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message |