Dear Rachel, I LOVE you, but please . . . . . .

[Stinky The Clown]

. . . . can't you find more meaningful, more important guests than McCain's kid?

If you're going to have her on again, how a big, flashing "V A P I D" on the screen?

[Motown_Johnny]

1. she is the only one in her party that isn't insane (or at least doesn't act insane)

so having he on isn't a bad thing


besides, she is plugging her book

[Canuckistanian]

2. She could do worse

And I mean that about Rachel AND Megan.

Anyone who openly calls O'Donnell a 'nutcase' is at least approaching sanity.

[calimary]

6. Meghan McCain is one of the very very few republi-CONS who does approach sanity.

It's amazing that there are ANY reasonable voices speaking out from that side of the room anymore. I hope we eventually start to see more Republicans like her.

[HughMoran]

3. She may be the only Republican with more than 3 brain cells

I don't see what your objection is.

[lonestarnot]

8. Her improper use of the English language on the TV box would be one of mine plus she's a CONpug.

:puke:

[underpants]

4. Breaking: blonde with boobs gets attention

:+

[Hekate]

9. Breaking: Blonde with brains gets dissed on all sides for not being anorexic like Coulter

The Repubs want her to STFU. What's in it for us to join the sexist chorus?

Critique her ideas -- she has some. Leave her chunky little body out of it. I respect Rachel's judgment about her guests.

Hekate

[FirstTimeVoterAt37]

5. Not being obviously insane isn't enough for me

If Megan wants to be reasonable, she's on the right track but has a LONG way to go.

[lonestarnot]

7. Afuckingree!

:puke: