Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Airline Tells Self-Advocate He’s ‘Too Disabled To Fly’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 07:37 AM
Original message
Airline Tells Self-Advocate He’s ‘Too Disabled To Fly’
A man with cerebral palsy missed his own speaking engagement last month at a national self-advocacy conference after US Airways removed him from a flight calling him “too disabled to fly.”

Johnnie Tuitel was scheduled to fly Sept. 23 from Palm Beach, Fla. to attend the 2010 National Self-Advocacy Conference in Kansas City, Mo. put on by Self Advocates Becoming Empowered, or SABE. After a US Airways employee helped him board the plane, the employee returned to tell Tuitel, who uses a wheelchair, that for safety reasons he needed a companion in order to fly that day.

Tuitel, who lives in Grand Rapids Township, Mich., says he’s flown 500,000 miles, often related to his work as a motivational speaker, and has never had a problem flying by himself. In fact, two days later Tuitel flew alone on a Delta flight.

Representatives of US Airways said their employees acted within company policy which states: “For safety-related reasons, if a passenger has a mobility impairment so severe that the person is unable to physically assist in his or her own evacuation from the aircraft, US Airways requires that a person travel with a safety assistant.”

http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2010/10/18/usairways/10739/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. This statement by the Airline>>
Edited on Tue Oct-19-10 08:43 AM by BlueJazz
“For safety-related reasons, if a passenger has a mobility impairment so severe that the person is unable to physically assist in his or her own evacuation from the aircraft, US Airways requires that a person travel with a safety assistant"

....is one I rather have to agree with.

On Edit: I should point out that IF an aircraft had a minor crash (a major crash wouldn't matter)...the attendants would be tied up trying to get a the non-handicapped to safety and you couldn't expect them to devote all their time to the passengers who are handicapped....at the expense of everyone else.
The "safety" person would know the needs of the handicapped individual and would be devoted ENTIRELY to saving His/Her life.
I believe it's a better system then ...Everybody is on their own.
True...most people MAY help the handicapped person but you can't count on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC