The nation's most ambitious mass transit expansion....in the posterchild city for nightmare sprawl

[marmar]

from the Transport Politic blog:




Realizing the Impossible: Los Angeles’ Subway Extension




Admittedly, there have been plans for a high-capacity subway extending from downtown Los Angeles to Santa Monica along Wilshire Boulevard for decades. In both 1980 and 1990, L.A. County voters approved referenda that increased taxes to pay for transit expansion programs; one of the primary elements of both of those programs was the Westside subway, intended to provide an alternative to the rapidly expanding congestion in the region’s densest district. In the 1990s, subways were under construction — and the Purple Line made it as far as Wilshire and Western Avenue — before voters, worried about cost increases and the dangers of digging through areas with methane gas underground, mandated that no more transit funds could be used for the construction of subways. A similar resolution in the U.S. Congress prevented federal funds from being used for the purpose. It seemed that the days of heavy rail digging were done in America’s second-largest city, and most recent financing has gone to light rail.

But change is afoot, and the release last week of a staff report advising an optimal design for the new line under the Westside represents a notable step forward. The L.A. Metro board will make an official selection of a locally preferred alternative on October 28th, paving the way for federal funds as early as next year and the beginning of construction as early as 2012. The recent announcement that the Crenshaw light rail line would receive a $526 million loan from Washington to advance the project two years ahead of schedule is additional evidence that L.A.’s plans have the wind at their back.

L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has been one of the country’s most vocal proponents of increased spending on public transportation, and it was under his pressure not only that momentum for a “Subway to the Sea” was reawakened, but also that voters passed an additional local tax for the purposes of funding transit expansion in 2008 and that Congress reversed its prior ban on funding for subways in the city. What was almost a personal crusade evolved into a citywide effort to get the project done. Today is the deadline for public comment on the expansion plan: L.A. Metro is hoping to get progress going on this project as quickly as it can.

Unfortunately for L.A., this desperately necessary project — one of the most important urban transit schemes in the nation — is also extremely expensive, likely to cost between $4 and $6 billion in year-of-expenditure dollars. Limitations on the amount of funding available, since much of the new tax revenues will be spent on projects elsewhere in the region for geographical equity and political expediency, mean that the full 9-mile line cannot be completed until 2036, a disappointment for the Mayor, who wants his pet project done as quickly as possible. Thus Mr. Villaraigosa’s 30/10 plan, which would speed completion on all twelve of the city’s planned transit corridors to 2020 instead of 2040 as currently funded. ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.thetransportpolitic.com/2010/10/18/realizing-the-impossible-los-angeles-subway-extension/

[Jkid]

1. "one of the most important urban transit schemes in the nation — is also extremely expensive"

Here's one solution: Stop building new roads and stop expanding roads.

[elleng]

2. 'Solution?' To what? And end of commerce???

[Initech]

4. Give you an idea of how backwards my town is (Anaheim Hills, CA):

We voted against a train station, we voted against turning an abandoned military base into a viable commercial airport (which would replace SNA and do wonders for LAX and SAN modernization) but voted to add four additional lanes to CA-91, which is already universally known as the highway to hell.

[Jkid]

5. Why it's called the highway to hell?

[Initech]

6. Drive it at any time between 3:00 and 7:00PM, you'll see why.

The eastbound traffic is always dead stopped, and sometimes it can stretch from I-15 all the way to I5 ( a span of 40 miles).

[Johonny]

7. my area of LA

has brilliantly removed it's light rail, fought to make sure the new light rail does not pass through it and even more brilliantly fought to keep the highway system far away. LA area is filled with small pockets of small minded people and thus a terrible, terrible transportation system.

[Initech]

9. Yeah there are some serious pockets of stupidity around here, that's for damn sure.

[enid602]

3. LA 30/10

What the article doesn't say is that LA already has local funding (given recent sales tax increases) to do the projects over 30 years. LA 30/10 just speeds it up; $40billion in projects over a 10 year span. This will have a tremendous impact on blue collar unemployment.

[Bluenorthwest]

8. Good news for LA

When they were digging the Red Line on Hollywood Bl, an old man started chatting with me as we watched the very disruptive dig. He agreed that it was good they were putting in rail, but he pointed out that they were just putting rail back where it used to be. "I stood on this very spot and watched them tear out the Red Car tracks many years ago, and I said they'd regret it and it would cost a fortune to correct the mistake, but the tire companies and oil guys were aginst the rail."