Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justices Scalia And Thomas's Attendance At Koch Event Sparks Judicial Ethics Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:53 PM
Original message
Justices Scalia And Thomas's Attendance At Koch Event Sparks Judicial Ethics Debate
Reports that two Supreme Court Justices have attended seminars sponsored by the energy giant and conservative bankroller Koch Industries has sparked a mild debate over judicial ethics.

On Tuesday evening, the New York Times reported that an upcoming meeting in Palm Springs of "a secretive network of Republican donors" that was being organized by Koch Industries, "the longtime underwriter of libertarian causes." Buried in the third to last graph was a note that previous guests at such meetings included Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, two of the more conservative members of the bench.

Read the full article on the link below:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/20/scalia-thomas-koch-industries_n_769843.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. If these RepubliDeviants would like to apologize to America for this transgression, then...
Edited on Wed Oct-20-10 01:58 PM by SpiralHawk
Americans would undoubtedly be willing to watch them grovel -- before packing them off to some faraway TeaBagliCon Homeland (R) where they can do no more harm to the US of A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. They were probably there to collect their checks.
"Don't mention it Mr. Koch. We're glad to do our part in turning the US over to corporate interests."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's reprehensible.
I suppose they should be allowed to attend such meetings. But when those issues come up before the Supreme Court, then they MUST recuse themselves.

But they won't.

Disgusting.

Recommended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Scalia", "Thomas", and "Judicial Ethics" don't belong in the same sentence.
You can easily throw "Roberts" into the "things that don't belong together" pit as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. The ethics of those Republican operatives are not debatable.
They're non-existent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. "the American People"


is a phrase these two define as "the Modern Robber Barons."

The rest of us can go suck eggs if we expect Free Speech, Privacy, Equal Justice, Checks and Balances and Fair Elections.

Scabia and Thomas are bought and paid for judicial demons.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. The fix was in folks
For the Citizens United decision!

Now we just need to see what "special" events have been attended by Roberts, Alito, and Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This is how the corporations became "people"... Bet that's when that
mulled over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not a problem if Scalia and Thomas recuse themselves from all decisions the Koch brothers would want
influence. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can't post what I'm thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Impeach the motherfuckers (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billlll Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. IMPEACH possible in our laws?
How?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Code of Conduct
Edited on Wed Oct-20-10 02:48 PM by Tx4obama
From ThinkProgress

A Supreme Court justice lending a hand to a political fundraising event would be a clear violation of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, if it wasn’t for the fact that the nine justices have exempted themselves from much of the ethical rules governing all other federal judges. Nevertheless, a spokesperson for the Supreme Court tells ThinkProgress that “the Justices look to the Code of Conduct for guidance” in determining when they may participate in fundraising activities. Under that Code:

Fund Raising. A judge may assist nonprofit law-related, civic, charitable, educational, religious, or social organizations in planning fund-raising activities and may be listed as an officer, director, or trustee. A judge may solicit funds for such an organization from judges over whom the judge does not exercise supervisory or appellate authority and from members of the judge’s family. Otherwise, a judge should not personally participate in fund-raising activities, solicit funds for any organization, or use or permit the use of the prestige of judicial office for that purpose. A judge should not personally participate in membership solicitation if the solicitation might reasonably be perceived as coercive or is essentially a fund-raising mechanism.


http://thinkprogress.org/2010/10/20/scalia-thomas-koch/

p.s. The whole article on the link above is really worth reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Memo LEAKED Beck, Koch bros, Chamber coordinated with Banks & Insurers on 2010 election strategy
Edited on Wed Oct-20-10 03:01 PM by Tx4obama
From - http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/10/20/911976/-Memo-LEAKED!-Beck,-Koch-bros,-Chamber-coordinated-with-BanksInsurers-on-2010-election-strategy

While the Koch brothers — each worth over $21.5 billion — have certainly underwritten much of the right, their hidden coordination with other big business money has gone largely unnoticed. ThinkProgress has obtained a memo outlining the details of the last Koch gathering held in June of this year. The memo, along with an attendee list of about 210 people, shows the titans of industry — from health insurance companies, oil executives, Wall Street investors, and real estate tycoons — working together with conservative journalists and Republican operatives to plan the 2010 election, as well as ongoing conservative efforts through 2012.

18 page memo (of the LAST gathering) with list of names here: http://images2.americanprogressaction.org/ThinkProgress/secretkochmeeting.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. And the TeaBagliCons keep drinking their kool aid
dancing merrily, voting against themselves and for fatcat puppetmasters who are playing them for fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. No debate required. They have no ethical standards. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. Those judges need to be put uner an ethics probe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Koch Bros. fund Federalist Society
Lots of Depends wearing stinky pants pouring out of that cesspool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R What an absurd lack of ethics or any normal discretion for that matter.
Edited on Wed Oct-20-10 05:17 PM by Waiting For Everyman
People who demonstrate contempt for the intent of our law, sitting at the top of it. What a sad state of affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. great post ty I need this info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. Coming up on KO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC