Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's wrong with this picture?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:14 PM
Original message
What's wrong with this picture?
Edited on Wed Oct-20-10 07:15 PM by grahamhgreen



This tax structure is unconscionable.

End of story.

Let's return to the 94% Eisenhower rate on income over 10 million until we balance our budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. With THIS Congress?
:rofl:

Oh...the tears from laughing so hard.

Thanks for that laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good graph....
now excuse me while I get some painkillers.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think the 94% is excessive - I don't think ANYBODY should have to pay their
government almost !00% of income regardless of how much they make. If the government didn't piss away so much money, it could be more equitable.

They DO need to pay a LOT more than the rest of us, that I'll grant you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. There is probably a balance between
pre-Reagan times and post Reagan times that would work better for the country and everyone. I am thinking 50% range perhaps with additional levels so the 50% doesn't hit until earnings get obscene enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I think that sounds pretty fair - not that I'll ever have to worry about it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree with that. 50% of everything over a million is fine...
Hell I could deal with 40% over a million. As long as they get rid of all the loopholes. Frankly as little hard work as these white collar guys do they should be glad to pay out half just to avoid having to do anything that might mess up their manicure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yeah it's the loopholes that really skew it. Even then there are certain people
who would figure out ways around it, but it would be more fair to people who were honest and hard working and wanted to pay their fair share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Please... not 94% of their income...
94% of their income above a certain level

In 1959.. the top marginal rate was 90%... That meant that the tax rate on anything you made over $400,000 was taxed at 90% In 2010 dollars, that would be about $2.94 million bucks.

And that's on the adjusted gross income, so all the deductions and loopholes apply.

I could go with that today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Well said. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. It worked for the
Republicans under Eisenhower, but i could settle for the pre- Reagan rate of 74%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-10 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Nobody paid 94% of their income in taxes.
Edited on Thu Oct-21-10 12:36 AM by Luminous Animal

The 94% rate is levied only on income over a specific amount. That is what is called a progressive tax.


An extremely simple example. Let's say you earn $1,200,000 and the top tax rate for $1,000,000 is 25% and everything over $1,000,000 is taxed at 94%. That means that the first million that you make will be taxed at 25% but the next $200,000 will be taxed at 94%.

1st million at 25% = $250,000
Next 200,000 at 94% = 188,000
Actual taxes paid = $438,000 which is a 36% tax rate on $1,200,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. That's not how graduated income taxes work
If they're in the 94% bracket, they don't pay 94% on all income.

I'm gonna use round, made-up numbers for this example.

They pay 0% on the first $20,000
They pay 10% on 20,000 to 30,000
They pay 20% on 30,000 to 60,000
They pay 30% on 60,000 to 100,000
They pay 34% on 100,000 to 10,000,000
They pay 94% on everything over 10,000,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hartmann said today that the top 25 hedge fund managers
average salary for this year, and this is this year only, was 2.2 BILLION. Poor guys, I bet their hands are all calloused, I bet their backs ache terribly, I mean to work hard enough to make 2.2 billion in a year you gotta be fucking Superman.. or LEX FUCKING LUTHOR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. That's not a salary, that's a cut of the loot from their global pillaging.
I'm beginning to think we not only need a maximum wage, we need a lifetime cap on earnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You gotta wonder about these people
Edited on Wed Oct-20-10 08:45 PM by walldude
That level of greed has to be a disease or something, I mean, how fucking much do you need? And how can you be so greedy and watch others suffer because of it? How does a person live with themselves knowing that the cost of adding those gold faucets to their yacht could have fed 1000 people for 6 months? I can't even fathom it.

I'm all for people getting rich and living comfortably but there should be limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Sociopaths are genuinely incapable of considering others.
It's a gravely serious disability and those who have it should not be allowed power over others, including access to other peoples' money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Good points all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. And then after we balance our budget.
Let's lower it to 91%.

Am I not merciful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. What are the top 25 doctors earning? n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-10 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. A hell of a lot less than that.
Edited on Thu Oct-21-10 12:39 AM by Incitatus
Cardiology and plastic surgeons are the highest paid and usually don't go over 1 million a year. Less than 1 thousandth of the top hedge fund managers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes..."
Leona Helmsley spoke for her class...

94% of ten million? still leaves 600,000 after taxes...sounds like more than enough to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-10 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. Bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC