Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-10 07:14 PM
Original message |
Seventeen equals Nineteen Million |
|
The top seventeen (17) wage earners took home exactly the same amount of income as the bottom nineteen million (19,000,000) wage earners.
Source: Keith Olbermann.
|
MrSlayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-10 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I'll bet they have better health care than the bottom fifty million too.
|
gmoney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I always balk at using the word "earners" in cases like this. |
|
I'd say the top 17 are probably "recipients" rather than "earners."
|
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Sad, isn't it, when if you think about it, those 19 million voters should |
|
easily beat the 17 other voters.
Just sad.
|
Kat45
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-10 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
That's about all I can say right now.
|
the redcoat
(510 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Good thing we don't tax those 17 too much! |
|
Or, you know, we might have 10% unemployment and the auto and lending industries might crash with wall street!
Oh...wait...shit.
|
felix_numinous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-21-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the banks? Too bad we can't print our own money, barter with each other till we all have enough. Uh oh I'm sounding like a socialist liberal. Declare independence from the banks, they don't need us, so why do we need them?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message |