Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-GF breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas..he was obessed with porn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:54 AM
Original message
Ex-GF breaks her 19-year silence about Justice Clarence Thomas..he was obessed with porn

so she left Anita Hill hanging in the wind?


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/21/AR2010102106645.html?sid%3DST2010102004599&sub=AR

When Anita Hill accused Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment during his explosive 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Thomas vehemently denied the allegations and his handlers cited his steady relationship with another woman in an effort to deflect Hill's allegations.

Lillian McEwen was that woman.

At the time, she was on good terms with Thomas. The former assistant U.S. attorney and Senate Judiciary Committee counsel had dated him for years, even attending a March 1985 White House state dinner as his guest. She had worked on the Hill and was wary of entering the political cauldron of the hearings. She was never asked to testify, as then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.), who headed the committee, limited witnesses to women who had a "professional relationship" with Thomas.

Now, she says that Thomas often said inappropriate things about women he met at work -- and that she could have added her voice to the others, but didn't.

And she is silent no more.

She has written a memoir, which she is now shopping to publishers. News broke that the justice's wife, Virginia Thomas, left a voice mail on Hill's office phone at Brandeis University, seeking an apology -- a request that Hill declined in a statement. After that, McEwen changed her mind and decided to talk about her relationship with Thomas.

To McEwen, Hill's allegations that Thomas had pressed her for dates and made lurid sexual references rang familiar.

"He was always actively watching the women he worked with to see if they could be potential partners," McEwen said matter-of-factly. "It was a hobby of his."
He was obsessed with porn," she said of Thomas, who is now 63. "He would talk about what he had seen in magazines and films, if there was something worth noting."

McEwen added that she had no problem with Thomas's interests, although she found pornography to be "boring."

According to McEwen, Thomas would also tell her about women he encountered at work. He was partial to women with large breasts, she said. In an instance at work, Thomas was so impressed that he asked one woman her bra size, McEwen recalled him telling her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nice timing...See Ginny's head explode
What a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think Ginny knew this was coming down the pike...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
44. Of course Ginny knew what was coming down the pike!
Her sudden "out-of-the-blue" demand for an apology from Anita Hill after all these years wasn't really out of the blue. I am NOT surprised to see this story on DU today, and I doubt if anyone else is either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Judge McEwen worked for Joe Biden while dating Thomas---
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 10:06 AM by msanthrope
Which tells me that Biden knew exactly what this dirtbag was, and, that Ms. McEwen, at the time, did not feel she had the clout or support to come forward....


"McEwen's connection to Thomas was strictly personal. She had even disclosed that relationship to Biden, who had been her boss years earlier."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. To me it seemed like McEwen and Thomas may have been on amicable terms at the time.
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 10:20 AM by Tatiana
She seems very matter-of-fact about his penchant for naughtiness. It may be likely that she did not want to jeopardize her own career by revealing information that would corroborate Hill's testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Entirely possible. But she did not have to be a 'hostile' witness to confirm
Thomas's penchant for porn...all she had to do was tell the truth...

now, the question is why didn't Biden call her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Remember Harriet Grant (Scooter Libby's wife now) is the one that reviewed all the allegations
against Clarence. Harriet would likely have stonewalled anything McEwen tried to corroborate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. Senate Judiciary really is incestuous snake-fucking, isn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh dear Mrs Thomas...you may have opened a can of worms...
Couldn't have happened to a nicer person...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
45. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. He sounds so....
lovely...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. A real keeper, eh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Really...It's a wonder he ever got past a first date! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. Maybe the comparisons to Long Dong Silver were apt. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
43. It would take more than that for me,
but whatevah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Aha! Perhaps we can embarrass Justice Thomas to the point
where he feels it necessary to resign. Now, that would be a goal worth working toward, I think.

And yet, I doubt it will ever happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. "At least I wasn't into diaper sex with hookers." - Clarence T. (R)
"...or into wide-stance rentboy faux lesbian luggage-handling credit card sex in airport bathrooms, like some other Republicons. I think my Republicon cronies should give me a standing O -- like they did for Senator Diaper Dave Vitter (R). So there."

- Clarence T. (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. LOLOLOLOL....It's the Republican Way.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. She's shopping a book... she won't be taken seriously
I have no doubt she is telling the truth but it's too little to late. She knew what a jerk this guy was and she still let him get on the Supreme Court? While, like you said, leaving Anita Hill hanging in the wind? Sounds like she couldn't drum up any interest in her book and hit the jackpot when Thomas's wife decided to make an ass of herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Judge McEwen will be taken seriously. She worked for Joe Biden while
she was dating Thomas, so I suspect there's a big, fat juicy DC story there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
33. You may want to check out my post below -
an excerpt from Anita's book.

My blood pressure has been spiking this week as I relive that miserable circus of Democrat and Republican men who clearly didn't, and perhaps still don't, think there is anything wrong with sexual harassment. They didn't/don't think it is/was wrong.

IMO - the only lynching that went on back then was of a good woman who is very private. Most people don't realize that she did not come to the Committee - they went after her and all the other women that they then would not allow to testify. Actually Biden and his troops lynched millions of women who have experienced unwanted attention in the work place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. Congress let Hill hang in the wind
by shutting down the the hearings with other witnesses willing to testify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
30. They didn't just hang her in the wind - they treated like a defendant in a criminal trial.
From Anita's book - Speaking Truth to Power

"Midway through the morning of my testimony at the Thomas confirmation hearing, Senator Howell Heflin, Democrat of Alabama, summed up the Republican attack on my credibility. A former state supreme court judge and trial attorney, Senator Heflin appeared to be deliberating aloud as he explained his approach.

"I, and I suppose every member of this committee, have to come down to the ultimate question of who is telling the truth. My experience as a lawyer and a judge is that you listen to all the testimony and then you try to determine the motivation for the one that is not telling the truth.

"Now, in trying to determine whether you are telling falsehoods or not, I have got to determine what your motivation might be. Are you a scorned woman?" he asked.

"No," I said, a bit surprised by the line of questioning but certain of my answer.

"Do you have a martyr complex?" With his heavy accent and deliberate pacing, "martyr" came out sounding like "mah'duh."

"No, I don't."

"Maybe she is a martyr and doesn't know it," someone behind me snickered.

"Do you have a militant attitude relative to the area of civil rights?"

"No, I don't." I was not certain what he meant, but I knew I was not a militant in the way the term was defined in the 1960s.

"The reality of where you are today is rather dramatic," Senator Heflin said. "Did you take, as Senator Biden asked you, all steps that you knew how to take to prevent being in the witness chair today?"

"Yes, I did. Everything that I knew to do, I did." I felt like a child who was being chastised for wandering into traffic.

Senator Heflin's questions revealed a truth about the hearing. Generally, questions about motive are raised in the context of a criminal trial. They are designed to elicit the impetus for a criminal act. The prosecution presents the theory that the accused committed the crime out of greed, rage, or passion. The defense attorney attempts to show that none of these factors existed in the case. Heflin's questions revealed that I was being treated as a defendant.

The Republicans had accused me of lying about Clarence Thomas' sexual harassment of me when I worked for him ten years earlier. They effectively shifted the hearing on whether Thomas was suitable to serve on the Court to a hearing on whether I could rebut their presumption that I was lying. Primed by all the rhetoric before the hearing, the American public was predisposed to be suspicious of my statements and my behavior. Before anyone would even listen to my charges, I had to prove that my character was such that I was not guilty of inventing them. Throughout the country, people were poised to register their verdict through the polls taken during the hearing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. bad flashback for me with Biden
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 10:35 AM by G_j
& I also remember watching him throw softballs to the witnesses during the Iran Contra hearings. Since then, I've never trusted the dude.

------

maybe somebody will dredge up the entire Anita Hill testimony and make it available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. You probably remember this:
Angela Wright. Scroll past the pic and newspaper copy for easier reading.

http://www.brandeis.edu/investigate/selectedwork/docs/AngelaWright_TheOtherWoman.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. big thanks, just read the whole thing
interesting to read all the different reasons given for her not testifying..

btw, The Complete Transcripts, Clarence Thomas, Anita Hill - Paperback (Aug. 30, 2005) by Nina Totenberg

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=nina+totenberg&x=16&y=19
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. He Must Have Been A Real Prince Charming.
Regaling female with your obsession for pornography is a great way to endear yourself with them. I wonder if he shared his obsession with Ginni.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. "Disgruntled ex-gf trying to sell a book." Do I have it right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Judge McEwen? I think she's a bit more than that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. The quote marks clearly indicate it is what I expect to HEAR, not what I think.
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 10:13 AM by WinkyDink
You think FOX, which calls the PRESIDENT names, will stop at a JUDGE?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I misunderstood you, and I apologize. I think Fox will studiously ignore
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 10:25 AM by msanthrope
the Judge....although Laura Ingraham may want to defend her ex-boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. Does Anybody Remember The Professor Who Testified On His Behalf?
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 10:10 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
He looked like he came out of a museum and said " He couldn't believe such a man watched porn. That such a man would only read Shakespeare or Yates." or some such nonsense.

It struck me as absurd in two senses; almost any man has watched porn and that he was shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. NO...she didn't leave Anita hanging...she and three other ladies wanted to
testify in support of Ms. Hill...Biden and the committee nixed that...another example of Congress never really wanting to get to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
38. Because most of them were committing the same crime...
They didn't think it was a crime for the 100 most powerful men in the world to enjoy the spoils of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
20. I'd love to do a statistical analysis of Republican voter lists and subscriptions to extreme porn.
Obviously the lists would be difficult to come by (no pun intended), but it would be interesting. And I'm not talking about Playboy, Penthouse, or Hustler - those are mild. I'd like to run the correlations on really sick stuff like web sites that offer "hairy preggo fucks a horse" type shit - you know, nothing ANYONE should be interested in (and I just made that term up because it sounded too weird to be true). I'm not the gambling sort, but I might just put money on the odds that there's a strong correlation between how far to the right one is and how sick the porn is that they subscribe to.

Note: I fully support the 1st Amendment and even sick porn has a right to exist (as long as the participants are of legal age). That's not the issue here. It is the hypocritical bullshit the right wing throws out about "family values" and other such nonsense that they don't practice in their own lives.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe Ginny should have let sleeping dogs lie? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. Yep, I was thinking that. However,
if she's naive enough to think ol' Pube on Coke is truly innocent, she probably doesn't have the brainpower to put it all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. The pube-on-Coke-can incident was something you couldn't make up
Sorry Clarence, but philanderer and Supreme Court justice are two paths which are just not that complementary :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angel123 Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
24. ex GF shopping book.
If I read the article correctly, McEwen has been shopping the book for some time. She hopes that Ginny's call would elict interest in her book. I'm thinking Ginny got wind of the book and was trying to do damage control. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Welcome to DU!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. Not Drawing The Same Conclusion
Unless Ginny has money invested in the book, i would think that this would do nothing but drum of interest. Ginny's actions make the book MORE salable and those increase the interest of publishers.

If she really was concerned about, she would have laid low, since nobody would have cared about a CT tell-all until Ginny opened her big yapper.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. ProfessorGAC, right again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. i wouldn't bet on that woman being that sophisticated. her phone call is classic church lady
aggression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
32. Want to place a bet on wether or not Virginia ran this on by the Chief Liar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
47. I'm betting the advent of the smartphone has given this guy
all kinds of new opportunities to explore his fetishes anywhere and anytime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC