Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shell considers halting U.S. refinery plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 07:59 AM
Original message
Shell considers halting U.S. refinery plans
An 'A' for creativity. Can't have anything to do with KSA's production crashing, can it, or trolling for a Government handout.


Shell considers halting U.S. refinery plans
Bloomberg News
May 21, 2007

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/21/business/shell.php

SAN FRANCISCO: Royal Dutch Shell, the biggest European oil company, may shelve a joint venture plan to create the largest U.S. refinery because of President George W. Bush's efforts to reduce gasoline use, a Shell executive said Monday.

"If you're an investor getting ready to put several billion dollars into expanded capacity, would you do that when the president himself says we want less gasoline?" John Hofmeister, Shell's top U.S. executive, said at a conference in Santa Clara, California.

At stake is a $3 billion plan by Shell and Saudi Arabia's state oil company, partners in the Motiva Enterprises venture, to more than double the processing capacity of a refinery in Port Arthur, Texas, to 600,000 barrels of crude a day. Bush called in January for the country to increase use of renewable and alternative fuels to curb reliance on imported oil, seeking a 20 percent reduction in gasoline use by 2017.

Motiva in April 2006 said it planned to begin the expansion in 2007 and complete it in 2010. The expansion would vault the Port Arthur refinery past Exxon Mobil's plant in Baytown, Texas, currently the largest in the United States.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Your translation is right
Shell wants the US taxpayer to fund all or a good part of the building of the refinery expansion.

And while these negotiations are worked out, any actual work on the expansion will be put on the back burner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Catalytic crackers will be required to handle the heavier & more
sour crude that the world has left. More refineries will not be needed since it appears world oil production has peaked.













Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC