Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

3 GOP candidates spend $243M

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 03:48 PM
Original message
3 GOP candidates spend $243M
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=DBC2FEA8-CEAE-9DD7-77B0D7C27BEB082C

By: Alexander Burns
October 24, 2010 07:09 AM EDT

A group of three Republican candidates have spent nearly a quarter-billion dollars on statewide campaigns this cycle, overshadowing even the heavyweight independent groups commonly considered the biggest financial players of the 2010 elections.

The trio of Meg Whitman in California, Rick Scott in Florida and Linda McMahon in Connecticut together have burned through more money than the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, American Crossroads and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees have pledged to spend — combined.

Even in midterm elections awash with money and packed with larger-than-life campaigns, the collective sum of $243 million is nothing short of astounding — especially since that’s just the money that came out of their own pockets.

But here’s the punch line: None of these candidates is ahead in the polls. Two of them — Whitman and McMahon — are actually behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. a fool and his/her money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is that an example of republican fiscal responsibility?
Unbelieveable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I think it is a perfect example.
Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. It says more about how we are having a yard sale on elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nearly a quarter of a billion dollars
And lemme guess: They're all running on a platform of fiscal responsibility. Hold onto your wallets, folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AC_Mem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let's see, what do they stand for?
No taxes for the rich, no Wall Street reform, repeal Healthcare Law, drill baby drill.

Let the rich get richer, no holds barred on big banks, trust them to regulate themselves, take away healthcare for over 40 million who have a chance to receive it, let the banks gamble with people's social security.

And of course, corporations are people so no taxes or regulations for them because they are rich.

HOW can middle America and the poor not see this? Why isn't this all over the news?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. I hope they all lose trying to buy America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wow, & to think the Democrats are the ones who got *their* millions' worth.
That 243M put the pin in the party hog & fired up the Democratic base!

We are grateful, but we really need to know *who* to thank for all those millions who made our enthusiasm soar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dupe
Edited on Sun Oct-24-10 06:01 PM by pacalo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah and the repukes blame the dems for not being fiscally responsible.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC