Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tea Party Inc.: The Big Money and Powerful Elites Behind the Right-Wing's Latest Uprising

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 03:56 AM
Original message
Tea Party Inc.: The Big Money and Powerful Elites Behind the Right-Wing's Latest Uprising
ttp://www.alternet.org/story/148598/tea_party_inc.%3A_the_big_money_and_powerful_elites_behind_the_right-wing%27s_latest_uprising

AlterNet/The Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute / By Adele M. Stan

Tea Party Inc.: The Big Money and Powerful Elites Behind the Right-Wing's Latest Uprising

The Tea Parties are billed as a people's movement. But they wouldn't exist without the help of deep-pocketed billionaires.

October 24, 2010 |



Photo Credit: YieldMedia.org/The Nation Institute

This article was reported in collaboration with The Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute.

Win or lose, the Tea Party movement will come away from next week's elections triumphant, having injected into the Republican Party a group of candidates pledged to the dismantling of government and wed to the religious right. Of the movement's dozen favored candidates for U.S. Senate, all are anti-abortion, and five oppose it even in cases of rape and incest. Among their number are Colorado's Ken Buck, who has compared homosexuality to alcoholism, and Nevada's Sharron Angle, who wants to demolish both the Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency. Major GOP players, from political strategist Karl Rove to former Bush speechwriter David Frum, have fretted publicly over Tea Party extremism, with Frum complaining of the movement's "paranoid delusions."

But it has now become clear that these Tea Party "outsiders" are all part of an inside game, a battle for control of the Republican party.

Though billed as a people's movement, the Tea Party wouldn't exist without a gusher of cash from oil billionaire David H. Koch and the vast media empire of Rupert Murdoch. Many of the small donations to Tea Party candidates have been cultivated by either Fox News Channel, a property of Murdoch's News Corporation, or the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, chaired by Koch. The movement's major organizations are all run, not by first-time, mad-as-hell activists, but by former GOP officials or operatives.

Taken together, Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks (another far-right political group seeded by the Kochs) and Murdoch's News Corp, owner of Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, form the corporate headquarters of a conglomerate one might call Tea Party, Inc. This is the syndicate that funds the organizing, crafts the messages, and channels the rage of conservative Americans at their falling fortunes into an oppositional force to President Obama and to any government solution to the current economic calamity. Groups such as Tea Party Express, Tea Party Nation, and the FreedomWorks-affiliated Tea Party Patriots; the bevy of political consultants for hire; and various allied elected officials can be understood as Tea Party, Inc.'s loosely affiliated subsidiaries. The Web sites of FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity and the Tea Party side projects of Fox News Channel's Glenn Beck are linked with those of Tea Party Express and Tea Party Patriots, all of which in turn solicit support for Tea Party candidates.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's not just a battle for control of the Republican Party
The Tea Party was also formed to be so far right that many Republicans will seem more "moderate" and "mainstream" in comparison. "Sure Candidate X is conservative, but he's no teabagger - he'll wait a few days before resorting to 2nd amendment remedies instead of taking up arms immediately."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ultimately it's a battle for our money
With only the government standing in the way.

Capitalism is about profits - no matter what. Get enough people to hate the government and they'll fight against anything the govt says or does, just because it's the government, and regardless of whether or not the government might actually be doing something good, or at least, something that serves the best interests of everyone, not just a few elite corporate capitalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. The goal of polarization has been to extinguish the middle,
the bargaining table, diplomacy and civility so that there is no chance of public discourse. I believe they want to exhaust the intelligentsia and everyone skilled and or willing to arbitrate between the two parties.

These extremists actually despise real free independent thought, creativity, and have tried to normalize a hostile environment where think tanks and problem solving cannot even get started. This polarization stands in the way of a balanced foreign policy (an understatement..), or any progress on domestic challenges of energy, poverty, infrastructure, and just about every aspect of our declining country.

Polarization is evidence of a destructive mindset by people who do not care about collateral damage. They cannot be allowed to continue this path.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I follow you, but....
I think that exhausting intelligentsia and destroying public discourse are just side effects. The goal is still to weaken the power of the government so that an elite ruling class of corporate capitalists can continue the current course of squeezing the world's resources dry, running schemes to rob the middle to lower classes, access to military power where needed (Iraq + Afghanistan, for example), and generally mucking up the planet as long as there is a profit to be made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC