Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State pensions: ministers plan to pay £140 a week

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 08:56 AM
Original message
State pensions: ministers plan to pay £140 a week
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/oct/25/state-pensions-reform-simplified-end-means-testing
* Jo Adetunji
* The Guardian, Monday 25 October 2010

Old people spending habits The state pension may be standardised at £140 per person per week. Photograph: John Stillwell/PA

Ministers are planning a radical transformation of state pensions, which will see the system simplified and the amount available to pensioners increased. Everyone will receive the same £140-a-week payment and there will be an end to means-tested top-ups. Under the current system, a single person can receive £97.65 a week and a couple £156.15, with an extra means-tested amount available for the poorest pensioners. The changes, which are due to be detailed in a green paper by the end of the year, mean a single person could receive £7,280 a year and a couple £14,560. Ministers believe that removing means testing and the resulting reduction in bureaucracy will save around £6bn a year. They believe a single-tier system would also reduce reliance on benefits.

The changes are likely to benefit married couples and stay-at-home mothers the most, as the latter often fail to qualify for the full basic pension because they have taken time out from work and have not built up enough national insurance contributions. The proposal should give a boost to the coalition government after it came under intense criticism for scrapping child benefit for those earning more than the £44,000 threshold. A Department for Work and Pensions spokeswoman said last night that the proposals would make the pensions system easier to understand. "The chancellor has confirmed that the government will improve the quality and accessibility of pensions in the spending review period," she said.

snip

"The current system is very complex," the Daily Mail quoted a senior coalition source as saying. "It forces too many older people to be reliant on means testing, with many not taking up the support offered by the state. Too few are rewarded for working and saving, and it generates unequal outcomes for men and women. A radically reformed state pension will reward people who work and save, clarify the deal for future pensioners, and simplify the role the state plays in providing a clear and solid foundation for old age." Instead of basing pensions on means testing, the new system would be based on residency, with British citizens or people who have been living in the country for a certain number of years qualifying. Pensions are taxable, so people with savings which are over the income tax allowance threshold would not receive the full amount.

snip

Although reforms were due under Labour, the previous government had planned to increase the pension age gradually to 66 by 2026. Responding to the planned changes, Ros Altmann, a former pensions consultant to the Treasury and the newly appointed director-general of Saga, said: "A full-rate citizens' pension would be the most fantastic reform. The current system was designed decades ago by men and for men. It isn't fair to women."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC