Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Email we just got. Baby steps. But steps nonetheless

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:45 AM
Original message
Email we just got. Baby steps. But steps nonetheless

Extension of 24-Hour LWOP Family Support Policy to Same-Sex Domestic Partners of Federal Employees

The 24-hour Leave Without Pay (LWOP) policy was established by President Clinton in 1997 to encourage Federal agencies to make 24 hours of unpaid leave available to Federal employees for the following family support purposes:

(1) School and Early Childhood Educational Activities: Federal agencies should allow employees to participate in school activities directly related to the educational advancement of a child, including children of an employee’s same-sex domestic partner. This includes parent-teacher conferences or meetings with child-care providers, interviewing for a new school or child-care facility, or participating in volunteer activities supporting the child’s educational advancement. “School” refers to an elementary school, secondary school, Head Start program, or a child-care facility.

(2) Routine Family Medical Purposes: Federal employees should be permitted to accompany the children, including the children of their same-sex domestic partners to routine medical or dental appointments, such as annual checkups or vaccinations.

(3) Elderly Relatives’ Health or Care Needs: Federal agencies should allow employees to accompany an elderly relative, including the elderly relative of their same sex domestic partner to routine medical or dental appointments or other professional services related to the care of the elderly relative, such as making arrangements for housing, meals, phones, banking services, and other similar activities.

Although FMLA was never amended for these purposes, President Obama continues to support this LWOP policy extending coverage to Federal employees with same-sex domestic partners.

HHS will take appropriate action to permit employees with same-sex domestic partners to use 24 hours of LWOP in a leave year for this purpose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. 24 HOURS?
Who are they kidding?

This is ridiculous. This is a nothing measure, a sop. I know, I know.........it's what they could do at the time. ARGH.

It's not just baby steps.

More like slowly crawling. Maybe forward.

Jeez.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. 24 hours unpaid leave equates to 3 working days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Or six full mornings or afternoons, or 12 two-hour absenses.
Baby steps indeed, but steps nonetheless.

Kick and Rec.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yeah, I understand that.
But out of a whole year, this isn't much.

It's ridiculous.

Yes, it's better than nothing, but not by much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You mean The 24-hour Leave Without Pay (LWOP) policy isn't 24 hours long?
:shrug:

Call me confused.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. If I understand this correctly, the 24 leave applied originally to
married couples, but was unofficially extended to same-sex families or domestic partners as well, and that President Obama is continuing that policy. Is that correct? If so, then it's just a good thing. FMLA should be officially amended, though, to include same-sex families.

If I'm not interpreting this correctly, please let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC