Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GlaxoSmithKline to pay whistleblower $96 million

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 07:44 AM
Original message
GlaxoSmithKline to pay whistleblower $96 million
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303443904575578713255698500.html

OCTOBER 28, 2010
Whistleblower's Long Journey
Glaxo Manager's Discovery of Plant Lapses in '02 Led to Her $96 Million Payout
By PETER LOFTUS

In 2002, drug maker GlaxoSmithKline PLC sent one of its quality-assurance managers, Cheryl Eckard, to Puerto Rico to help clean up a mess at one of its biggest manufacturing plants. U.S. authorities had just cited the plant for several violations, including making a contaminated ointment used to treat skin infections on children.

Ms. Eckard's journey from North Carolina to the Caribbean set off a chain of events culminating in this week's announcement that she would collect at least $96 million for her role in helping the government secure a criminal guilty plea and a $750 million payment from Glaxo to settle an investigation of manufacturing deficiencies. Ms. Eckard's bounty is believed to be the largest award given to a single whistleblower in U.S. history...

Ms. Eckard worked at Glaxo from 1992 to 2003 and was a manager of global quality assurance at the company's Research Triangle Park, N.C., site at the time she was asked to visit the plant in Cidra, Puerto Rico. What Ms. Eckard found were even more problems than those cited by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The plant had received complaints that drugs of different types and strengths were being mixed up in the same bottle, and plant managers had made no attempt to issue a recall or correct the cause of the mix-ups. She learned of one consumer complaint that a boy was given double the dose of the antidepressant Paxil due to such mix-ups. Ms. Eckard made some strong recommendations to her superiors: Stop shipping all products from the plant, suspend manufacturing for two weeks to allow time to resolve the problems, and notify the FDA about the product mix-ups.

But Ms. Eckard's recommendations were ignored... She eventually told her boss that "she would not participate in a cover-up of the quality assurance and compliance problems at Cidra." By mid-2003, Ms. Eckard was terminated in what the company called a "redundancy" related to the merger of Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham PLC a couple of years before. After she left the company, she continued to try to persuade its compliance department that more needed to be done at Cidra. But she says the company took no action. Finally, in August 2003, she called the FDA's San Juan office and spent more than two hours detailing her concerns...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. But $96 million???
Just wow.

Welcome to DU, BTW. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scruffy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. A huge amount-but
I am completely convinced that fines will not change corporate behavior. When you start using handcuffs on them they will change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC