Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Huffington:Congress Needs to Find Out:Did Bush Order Gonzales & Card to Put the Squeeze on Ashcroft?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 03:57 PM
Original message
Huffington:Congress Needs to Find Out:Did Bush Order Gonzales & Card to Put the Squeeze on Ashcroft?
Congress Needs to Find Out: Did Bush Order Gonzales and Card to Put the Squeeze on Ashcroft?
Arianna Huffington


In today's L.A. Times, Jonah Goldberg discusses the "redemption" of John Ashcroft and fantasizes that the same image rehab may one day happen for George Bush. Talk about your Extreme Make-Over!

I'll save the discussion of the validity of Ashcroft's "hero" status for another day -- although it speaks volumes about the extent the Bush administration has defined deviancy downward that acting to protect the Constitution instead of undermining it is seen as a heroic act of courage, and a sign of remarkable integrity.

The problem with Goldberg's piece is that it shifts the focus away from where it should be: finding out who sent Vito and Big Pussy -- I mean, Alberto Gonzales and Andy Card -- to Ashcroft's sick bed to try to pressure him into reauthorizing aspects of the NSA wiretap program the acting Attorney General didn't think were legal.

Was it the president? James Comey, the former acting AG in question, testified that Bush called Ashcroft's wife to get Vito and Pussy -- sorry, Gonzales and Card -- into the ICU. So he was clearly in on the plan -- if not leading the plan -- to maneuver around the Comey roadblock by trying to get a deathly-ill man to sign off on his spy program. When NBC's Kelly O'Donnell asked the president last week if he'd authorized the high-ranking goon squading of Ashcroft, he refused to answer the question. Twice. Isn't that something Congress should be looking into?

more...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/congress-needs-to-find-ou_b_49070.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why?
So they can "chide" him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. So that the Dems can have one more reason to NOT impeach Bush..
It seems that, the more crap that bastard pulls, the safer his job is.

What planet is this, and how do I get back to my old one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. They will then send him a letter.
And make empty threats when he ignores it.

Wat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. It doesn't matter.. It'll all be smoke and mirrors
It's been proven today that our congress still doesn't give a crap what the voters want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. BEFORE Cheney starts bombing Iran
Edited on Tue May-22-07 04:02 PM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. And other than Comey, do they expect anyone else involved in this
midnight madness to tell the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Dems in Congress will ignore the Smoking Gun.
Comey stated that the Illegal Spying Operation continued for a "few weeks" before a compromise was reached with the DOJ. How many Felonies were perpetrated by Busholini and NSA in those "few weeks"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought Congress was looking into this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-22-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. WHO were they spying on and why? If lawmen Comey and Mueller had not
balked at the illegal spying program for two years, what got them all exercised about it in March 2004?

Comey said he and Ashcroft were "reviewing what they had learned" about the program. But Schumer didn't follow up with, "WHAT had you learned?"

Possibilities: That Rove/Gonzo & Cabal were spying on Comey and Ashcroft, and others in their own agencies? The domestic political opposition? Members of their own party? Was that how they kept people in line--spying blackmail?

I don't think those incredible late-night events around Ashcroft's ICU bed and at the WH (Comey refusing to meet with Card "without a witness"!), were about legal niceties--and a mere signature. I think it was what the illegal spying was being used FOR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC