After spending tens of millions, Meg Whitman's stunning fall in polls shows inability to connect, experts say
Ken McLaughlin
kmclaughlin@mercurynews.com
Posted: 10/28/2010 07:58:58 PM PDT
Updated: 10/28/2010 10:25:05 PM PDT
Republican candidate for Governor Meg Whitman talks to a voter Thursday night Oct. 28, 2010, at her Walnut Creek, Calif. campaign headquarters. (Dan Rosenstrauch/Staff)http://www.mercurynews.com/elections/ci_16462527?source=most_emailed&nclick_check=1Despite spending more than $160 million -- $141.5 million from her own pocket -- the billionaire is now down by 8 to 13 percentage points in the state's three major polls. It's a scenario no one could have imagined in mid-September, when polls showed Whitman and Democrat Jerry Brown running neck and neck. "The fact is that she just couldn't close the sale with voters," said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a political analyst at the University of Southern California.
But Whitman, political analysts say, has stumbled badly when her gold-plated consultants' political script went awry -- whether it was reporters asking about her dismal voting record, a celebrity attorney trotting out Whitman's former illegal immigrant housekeeper or "Today" show host Matt Lauer pushing her to take her TV attack ads off the air.
Most political analysts say Whitman can blame her collapse on the way the housekeeper scandal played out in late September and early October. If some evil mastermind had to design a scandal to hurt Whitman politically with Latinos and undecided voters, he probably couldn't have written a better plot.
"It reinforced the image of a coldhearted rich person who doesn't care for the semi-serfs -- as Jerry Brown calls them -- who work for her," said Jack Pitney, a professor of politics and government at Claremont McKenna College.