When Andy SULLIVAN rags on Gawker, we're supposed to HEEL (about O'DONNELL)

[UTUSN]

This would be the same Andy who kissed various anatomy parts of Shrub. Now he's a woman's advocate for Ms O'DONNELL. Of COURSE, he is!1

*************QUOTE*************

Why We Published the Christine O'Donnell Story

.... The reaction to the O'Donnell story was fairly unanimous: The New York Times' David Carr called it "skeevy" and "scuzzy"; TBD's Amanda Hess called it "degrading" and "misogynist"; and the National Organization for Women accused us of "public sexual harassment." Andrew Sullivan found it to be a "cowardly, brutal and misogynist invasion of privacy," ... ....

...no, we don't think there's anything wrong with what Christine O'Donnell did on Halloween three years ago. We think there's something wrong with what she's done every day since, though.

The author of this post can be contacted at [e-mail]

*************UNQUOTE*************

[atreides1]

1. Read the story at Gawker

And personally I don't give a rat's ass what NOW, Sullivan, or any others have to say.

People who live in glass house shouldn't throw rocks at anyone, and it seems that Miss O'Donnel's house is beginning to run out of walls.

[Dawson Leery]

2. The Christine O'Donnell's of the world have vilified

others for their behavior, while performing the same exact behavior they condemn.