spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 09:26 AM
Original message |
m$nbc headline - 'pundits forecast 52 seat loss for democrats in the house' |
|
now ain't that some shit....annonymous pundits are forecasting for m$nbc
who are 'pundits'?
how about some names?
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. no names...how many pundits? from where? |
Imajika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
3. They are not anonymous at all... |
|
They are the best in the business actually.
Charlie Cook, Stu Rothenberg, Larry Sabato and Nate Silver. All are predicting between 50-60 House seat losses.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. 'pundits' is annonymous. you offered the names... |
LeFleur1
(973 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
that the election is fixed? How else would they dare go on national TV and make a prediction like that? They must know how it is going to turn out, and unless they have ESP, that means a fixed election. I actually can't watch the 'news' anymore because of this kind of crap. This isn't news, it is a guess...unless...see above. They really get off on the guessing game these days...unless...see above.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message |