Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Government Changes Course With Chemical Test for Dispersant in Gulf Seafood

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 10:00 AM
Original message
Government Changes Course With Chemical Test for Dispersant in Gulf Seafood


http://onthehillblog.blogspot.com/2010/10/government-changes-course-with-chemical.html


The federal government on Friday announced it has developed and is using a chemical test to detect dispersants used in the Deepwater Horizon-BP oil spill in fish, oysters, crab and shrimp.

-snip-

Before now, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) had said that the presence of oil, not dispersants, were the problem.

In their Friday announcement, FDA and NOAA say that "to ensure consumers have total confidence in the safety of seafood being harvested from the Gulf, NOAA and FDA have added this second test for dispersant when considering reopening Gulf waters to fishing."

-snip-

Using this new, second test, in the Gulf scientists have tested 1,735 tissue samples including more than half of those collected to reopen Gulf of Mexico federal waters. Only a few showed trace amounts of dispersants residue (13 of the 1,735) and they were well below the safety threshold of 100 parts per million for finfish and 500 parts per million for shrimp, crabs and oysters, the FDA and NOAA say. As such, they do not pose a threat to human health, the agencies say.

-snip-
-----------------------------

I don't want ANY dispersant or oil in seafood

they may accumulate in the body like radiation does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. I still don't trust 'em. However, it's a step in the right direction.
Lets' hope some independent testing by advocacy groups occurs simultaneously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-30-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wonder how many they had to test before they were able to come up with those results.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC