Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why big-time CEOs make terrible politicians

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 10:59 AM
Original message
Why big-time CEOs make terrible politicians
Government and business are antithetical. That's not a flaw in the system — government exists to take on precisely those tasks the private sector can't or won't.

By Michael Hiltzik
October 31, 2010

California is poised once again to compete for the crown as the nation's leading graveyard for business superstars trying to make the jump into politics.

With election day yet 48 hours away, it's still possible that Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina will prevail in their campaigns for governor and U.S. senator. But the betting and the opinion polls are pointing the other way. So as we face the likely, if not certain, wreckage of these two lavishly financed campaigns, it's proper to ponder anew the following question: Why do big-time CEOs make such terrible politicians?

Of course, terrible politicians can come from anywhere, and not a few are currently serving in office. But you don't need much more than the fingers of one hand to count the successful business leaders who have morphed into successful politicians — and the political "success" of some is arguable.


"To be a CEO and to be a political leader each demands about 10 important qualities," he told me. "Maybe five of those are the same — you have to know how to read a budget, and delegate authority, and manage people, for example — but the others have absolutely nothing in common with each other."


more
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hiltzik-20101031,0,7983682.column
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R.......never the train shall meet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue sky at night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. they tout themselves as some kind of wonderkind....
but the bottom line is what is good for business is NOT always good for the Country. Their idea of regulation is NO regulation and that results in what we have today.

If in doubt check into the BP Oil spill disaster, or the Banking Disaster, or any one of NUMEROUS repuke Disasters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'll go so far as to say what is good for big business is rarely good for the country.
Nothing I've seen in business tells me there is any room for providing for common purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Silly Blue Sky…
Those weren't DISASTERS. They were OPPORTUNITIES.

Aintcha never heard of Disaster Capitalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue sky at night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. you made me smile...
thanks. and no, i have not heard that but if they can't make money they don't do it, so it has to ring true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Check out this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Shock-Doctrine-Rise-Disaster-Capitalism/dp/0312427999/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1288544504&sr=8-1

Amazon.com Review
Naomi Klein's The Shock Doctrine advances a truly unnerving argument: historically, while people were reeling from natural disasters, wars and economic upheavals, savvy politicians and industry leaders nefariously implemented policies that would never have passed during less muddled times. As Klein demonstrates, this reprehensible game of bait-and-switch isn't just some relic from the bad old days. It's alive and well in contemporary society, and coming soon to a disaster area near you.
"At the most chaotic juncture in Iraq'' civil war, a new law is unveiled that will allow Shell and BP to claim the country's vast oil reserves… Immediately following September 11, the Bush Administration quietly outsources the running of the 'War on Terror' to Halliburton and Blackwater… After a tsunami wipes out the coasts of Southeast Asia, the pristine beaches are auctioned off to tourist resorts… New Orleans residents, scattered from Hurricane Katrina, discover that their public housing, hospitals and schools will never be re-opened." Klein not only kicks butt, she names names, notably economist Milton Friedman and his radical Chicago School of the 1950s and 60s which she notes "produced many of the leading neo-conservative and neo-liberal thinkers whose influence is still profound in Washington today." Stand up and take a bow, Donald Rumsfeld.

There's little doubt Klein's book--which arrived to enormous attention and fanfare thanks to her previous missive, the best-selling No Logo, will stir the ire of the right and corporate America. It's also true that Klein's assertions are coherent, comprehensively researched and footnoted, and she makes a very credible case. Even if the world isn't going to hell in a hand-basket just yet, it's nice to know a sharp customer like Klein is bearing witness to the backroom machinations of government and industry in times of turmoil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Teabaggers love corporate CEOs
Teabaggers are good slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think it boils down to one thing. CEO's are very used to
issuing an orde and have it done...period. Political leaders must sell their idea and convince others that his/her idea is the right one, and theres always a lot of push back that few if any CEO is used to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grilled onions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Their Thinking Is Cold
They think gold,cash,stocks, rather then thinking of people. They are more into greed then voters in need. Every decision they make is decided by profit potential and not the benefit or negative effects on the people. They will not hesitate to harm the financial stability of the population as long as THEIR finances stay in good shape. They would make great slum lords. They are geared for high profit and have little conscience for the suffering going on around them.
I would much rather have someone who has been there and perhaps still there to help make those decisions that will affect us all. Never trust one who, not only cannot look you square in the eye, but cannot even face honest questions and would rather run away (or bar) reporters or voters from getting too close with questions of importance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't get it.
Given your description, how do they differ from run-of-the-mill Republican politicians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grilled onions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Actually Many of Them Are--They Seem Interchangeable
One that was not up to business par was baby bush. Failure seemed to follow him everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. The smart ones are content to just buy the politicians.
They certainly aren't lacking in candidates who are willing to be bought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC