Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Well, Obama got the bipartisanship he was pining for

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PhilosopherKing Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:08 AM
Original message
Well, Obama got the bipartisanship he was pining for
So much promise two years ago, pissed away.

There I said it.

Now how do we rebuild this thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilosopherKing Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Bullshit? He was the one who thought that
he could negotiate with snakes. Snake does only one thing, it bites. He should have known better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Blah. Blah. Blah.
Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Bury that head DEEP Into the sand
It still won't make the truth go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
61. Very eloquent.
You have completely brought me around to your point of view with that scintillating narrative.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Meh
Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Get lost. Yea, he campaigned relentlessly for the last month
because he wanted the rethugs to win. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Is your sarcasm meter on the blink?
OP's point was that, by following the failed path of "bipartisanship", Obama set the stage for the excessive compromise that disheartened many of his previous supporters, and paved the way for the Republicans to take over the House.

Seriously, if you need that explained to you....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #22
53. Sorry to butt in, but
I think she DID understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
62. You're telling another Dem to "get lost". Isn't that part of what got us into this mess?
Seems like you would benefit from learning a bit more about political persuasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. You're the only one pissing......
That's what I'm saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. The most progressive accomplishments of any President in 40 years.
So many chances to celebrate were pissed away by chronic malcontents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. +1,000,000,000,000!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
35. A kajiblion billon trajillion! LOLOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left coaster Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Hear, fucking, hear! You said it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. LOLOL
:rofl: TOO FUCKING FUNNY!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Yeah, more partying would have held the House
Not.

Many of us are quite unimpressed with corporatism dressed up as progress. But you keep counting all the cutesy acronym-titles for amounts to a steaming pile of anti-worker, anti-poor mendacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. Yeah, we're really enjoying that public option!
"Accomplishments" like turning HCR into a handout for the insurance companies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. That was the Senate's fault. Now the Senate is even more conservative.
I'm sure that blaming it all on how much Obama sucks was a great way to motivate people to vote. Now the Senate that caused the problem is even worse. Brilliant strategy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
54. It would have been a nice pony
I mean it. You did not get it. You can'r always get what you want. You got other nice presents that together with those that made Boehner the next speaker you kicked over and over because it was not EXACTLY what you wanted. Enjoy the absence of presents for a while!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. Now we have a common enemy to fight and the entire House is up for re-election in 2 years.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 08:27 AM by w4rma
And fewer DLCers to get in the way of our unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. "common enemy"
sadly in a way, this will become a much more friendly place as a result, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Did you take my comment personally?
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 01:50 AM by Radical Activist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
26. Yes they did pass some bills like the health care but those
bills fell a hell of a lot shorter than what they could have if they hadn't tried the bipartianisnship thingy.....we didn't get too many good things out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Do people still not get how conservative the US Senate is?
It was compromise or get nothing. Why is that so fucking hard to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. That's flat out nonsense
and even if it were true (which it's not) failing to be seen as even fighting for better policy- and calling out those standing in the way is what got Democrats into trouble early on.

Now you've got a Senate that on many issues leans- for all intents and purposes, Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Believing that Obama
didn't fight for better policy is a fantastic delusion. If you didn't see Obama fight or call people out then you were either living in a cave or consume "news" outlets as twisted as Fox.

At least 40 members of the Senate have leaned Republican for a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #37
47. Exactly!
He said one thing in speeches...

Point is if you're going lose, lose standing for something!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. He called out Kucinich, not LIeberman or Lincoln n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. And why the heck is Congress so damn conservative? Could it have anything to do with
Power monger Rahm Emanuel flying around the nation, from 2005 on, to make sure that progressives didn't have a chance in any places where the public wanted them? It will always be my belief that the substitution of Blue Dogs for Real Dems on account of slime like Rahm got us into this mess.

And why the heck did Obama reward Rahm with the Chief of Staff position? While running for the Oval Office, Obama claimed he would end NAFTA but instead gave the top spot to the man who offered Clinton the legal wording for NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #38
55. Could it have anything to do with
the people that vote them in?

I don't know where you live, but look around or look at a political map. I used to live in Manhattan, now I live in rural downstate IL, believe me, it's NOT the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #38
58. True, Delphi.
Working class people don't perceive anybody doing much 'for them' so they are more easily led by the likes of Limbaugh, Beck and O'Reilly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
36. nixon - clean air act, creation of epa, title 9 education act, water pollution control act amend-
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 02:51 AM by Hannah Bell
ments, osha, ssi, consumer product safety commission, vigorous desegregation of southern schools (70% segregated to 18% = "the greatest school desegregator in American history"), endorsed the equal rights amendment, federal affirmative action, state parks.

Nixon also attempted to get his Comprehensive Health Insurance Act passed. "Nixon's plan would have mandated employers to purchase health insurance for their employees, and in addition provided a federal health plan, similar to Medicaid, that any American could join by paying on a sliding scale based on income."


sorry, i don't think obama has achieved as much as nixon did yet. nixon, ironically the "last liberal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. My grandfather HATED Nixon, and my grandmother loved him. They couldn't talk about him without
getting into a scrap.

My grandfather was a Bob Taft Republican, and my grandmother was an LBJ Democrat.

I think my grandmother would've agreed with your take on the presidential career of Richard Milhous Nixon. Sometimes, it's a crazy old world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. both nixon & johnson had very mixed records, but i think both did some very progressive things --
way more than anything that's come since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #36
52. Nixon, the only Republican I have ever voted
for. Watergate doesn't sound so bad now. In this day and age I would do it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young but wise Donating Member (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
48. +1
Wow, I couldn't have said it any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
50. Chronic malcontents, my ass
The problem is that they pissed away their message. We did our fucking part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #50
60. thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
'Cause you're NOT the only one pissing. . . . ..



TG, NTY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. So much promise for a good post....
pissed away.

There I said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
You'll get beat up for posting this, but it's certainly true all we heard from the Admin for 2 years was 'reach across the aisle,' 'bipartisanship,' 'compromise' yadayadayada

So....maybe there's a master chess plan we don't know about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ugh. Unrec for nastiness and dishonesty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. Well most of us are drowning our sorrows and finger pointing is a bad idea tonight.
Obama campaigned like a champion in the final eight weeks and the white house finally went on the attack.

Tomorrow starts a period of rebuilding and some much needed navel gazing. Let's allow the wounds a little time heal shall we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Who gives a damn how he campaigned?
He wouldn't have had to campaign at all, if he hadn't failed to lead. From trotting out an anti-gay "religious man" on Inauguration Day, to watering down HCR, to DADT, and a host of other ways he stabbed his supporters in the back, it's his actions - not his campaigning - that mattered.

There are only so many promises you can break, before people think you're just like every other politician, and there's no sense in voting.

When the best you can offer voters is that our party doesn't suck as bad as theirs, that's not exactly inspiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. I feel your pain but you happen to be yelling at the wrong person.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 01:56 AM by pa28
I agree with just about every point in your post (I guess I just have a thing against hyperventilating).

I want to take up all these points and do what the Labour party in Britain did in the aftermath of their loss.

They took stock of their problems, deliberated, decided their future was returning to their base and made a commitment in that direction. I think we should too and the next few weeks and months give us a golden opportunity to re-evaluate what we are all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
56. Yes
:hug:. Actually :grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
15. YUP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. KNR. You rawk, your detractors suck, and that's the end of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Lol I love your middle school playground style n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oddmanout Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. The problem
The problem with the administration and the Democratic Leadership as a whole is that they failed to understand (or even make the attempt to understand) the fear that the average on the street American feels...(Whether this fear is real or perceived, trumped up by the Republican noise machine or their toadies in the Tea party) the leadership did not go far enough to reassure these people that they were working FOR them, instead people felt patronized by what the bloviators (like Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter) told them regarding what they termed as the "Arrogant, Elitist, Intelectuals" who were only trying to talk down to them, that their liberal ideas were best for the country and to "shut up and accept them" like children. Sadly Sarah Palin and her ilk strike a chord with "the common people" (which is crap because she is a narcissitic opportunist who will say anything to grow her own fame)that the Democratic leadership never were able to do.....They missed the opportunity to educate everyone with their successes (Health care, the stimulus, which saved the country from disaster). The Blaming of the Bush administration however warrented, grew old as well, no-one outside the beltway wanted to hear it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. I'm concerned about the "bipartisanship" we may get in the Senate
If enough Democrats get corrupted by the GOP we're fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
34. good question
he wont bow-out. so we lose the WH in 2 years.
he will act like a Clinton Republican and we'll lose.

end of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
40. the moaning spot is beside the tree in that direction -------->
take a picnic lunch.

have fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
42. k & r. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
44. Rec'd n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
45. Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
46. K&R
Edited on Wed Nov-03-10 06:48 AM by Carolina
Obama has a tin ear and is not that great a student of history.

He should have reviewed how the repuke minority treated Bill Clinton in 1993! They were obstructionists and not one voted for his omnibus budget bill of 1993. Doom and gloom they all predicted but we got prosperity. And that was before FAUX news and he was white!

He should also have studied how a selected, illegimate, ignoramus like Bush got everything he wanted WITHOUT super Congressional majorities...

Obama should never have tried to appease a hateful group of people who outspokenly wanted him to fail and many of whom are frankly racists bastards to boot. He should have come in like LBJ or FDR and fought them tooth and nail, pointed out (used that BULLY pulpit) their deficits under Reagan and both Bushes repeatedly, ended both wars, used the money at home and fought for a public option. He should not have peopled his team with the likes of Rahm, Geithner, Summers... Instead like FDR (the "traitor to his class"), O should have turned left and said: "I welcome their hatred" because they know I am cleaning up their mess and I am fighting for the people.

Anyway, I couldn't agree with you more about 2 years pissed away. I have been fighting since Reagan and have no idea how to fight or rebuild it any more when we have such a complicit, corporate owned media and such weak quisling Democrats who don't know how to WIELD power when they have it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
51. JOBS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC