ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 11:59 AM
Original message |
Single Payer health Care is coming to California Baby! |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I hope it goes screamingly well so the rest of the states will get on board! nt |
aquamarina
(772 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I was thinking the same thing myself this morning. |
|
That would be so awesome.
|
ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. This is why it was important for Brown to win. |
aquamarina
(772 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Any articles about this? Sure hope so! (FU Anthem) bt |
ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Single Payer health Care was vetoed by the Governator in February. |
|
http://californiaonecare.org/Call me crazy, but I do not see Brown vetoing SB 810.
|
ellie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I am moving to CA next year. I have to get the fuck out of Ohio for good.
|
ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. We need more liberals in Cali. Move west. |
ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
8. SB 810 to be reintroduced in 2011. |
thereismore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yes! Things will finally get moving in CA. The budget, health care, and economy. nt |
ej510
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-03-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Making California repukes irrelevant is important. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message |