Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Politician removed from office in England for lying about his opponent.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Courtesy Flush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:50 AM
Original message
Politician removed from office in England for lying about his opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. It would be nice to have that law in this country ...
... but the court has already decreed that corporations have a legal right to lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. We wouldn't have any politicians left! Wouldn't that be nice! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. lol...we'd have very few left indeed. ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. There is alot of good ideas from other countries we could use
but republicans will never let that happen because other country's are all evil and communist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's extremely rare for it to be applied here...
The last time that an MP was removed for corrupt practices in his election was nearly 100 years ago, in 1911.

Also a lot of lying and smearing is done not by the candidates but by the media, or sometimes by local single-issue nutcases (I could tell you tales about crap that's happened in the constituency where I live, that would make your hair curl!)

I am glad that this particular bloke is getting his come-uppance, however. While usually I'd be really upset at a Labour MP getting into trouble, this one was really Labour in name only, and a nasty anti-immigrant bigot, as well as a big supporter of the Iraq war. He has a record for attacking LibDem candidates from the *right*; e.g. in his first unsuccessful campaign in 1995 he attacked the LibDem candidate for being 'high on tax and soft on drugs'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'd be happy any time a candidate got rhetorically incinerated for lying
It doesn't even matter to me where they sit on the political spectrum; if someone's got to resort to defamation to win a campaign, they don't deserve to take part in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, the whining from that guy's intense
"In a statement, he said the judgement "raised fundamental issues about the freedom to question politicians"."

Only if you lie.

"They must accept that their political character and conduct will be attacked."

It is possible to do that without lying.

""It is vital to our democracy that those who make statements about the political character and conduct of election candidates are not deterred from speaking freely for fear that they may be found in breach of election laws.""

Then don't lie.

It's not complex, dumbass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. FUCK! If we did that we wouldn't HAVE a Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. How quaint
Imagine a law like that here...those big ole marble buildings in DC would be empty:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's just not cricket!
By jove!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Amazing.
Whereas here, we have laws that specifically allow lying, and laws that specifically do not allow truth-telling:

1 - FOX News won a case where two reporters were fired for refusing to broadcast a story that they knew was untrue. The court held that FOX was within its rights to lie and to insist that their employees lie

2 - Food producers are not allowed to include information on their labels stating that their products do not contain GM foods, even when the information is true. The stated concerns were (a) it implies there might be something wrong with GM foods and therefore harm the GM companies and (b) it is too much information and will just confuse consumers.

Yet another illustration that our system is corrupt from top to bottom. It is no wonder that our politics is so pathetic, we have gone from a country that values truth to one whose policies are against truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evasporque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Politician in U.S. removed from office for not lying about opponent....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC