Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I predict McNulty will blow the doors off this scandal ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:52 PM
Original message
I predict McNulty will blow the doors off this scandal ...
McNulty was not an ingenue. He has been there long enough to know how the system works, and the danger that testifying in front of Congressional Committees may present.

They all could be lying, however I think if anyone is closest to telling the truth it is McNulty. Why? McNulty honestly related that a US Attorney was fired to make room for a Karl Rove favorite, and performance was not an issue.

McNulty could have easily stuck to the party line on this one, but did not. McNulty evidently has been honest with Sen Schumer in the past, and money odds are that he told McNulty in private a lot --which earned him the 'scapegoat' label attached to him a mere hours after McNulty announced he was leaving the DOJ.

Monica's testimony regarding McNulty today seemed self-serving and in fact defended herself from prosecution for acting to cause false testimony before Congress. If McNulty did not lie, how would she extricate herself from criminal prosecution --except to obtain immunity first?

I think McNulty was smart enough to stockpile evidence to protect himself in the event he became the 'scapegoat'. McNulty was cut out of the loop, but he knew what was going on by talking to those in the loop. His revelations could bring the White House to its knees. And it has to be war because the White House is behind the labelling of him as the scapegoat.

This could get good in a hurry. I hope I am right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did you notice Monica G isn't really that intellectually impressive
I hope that she gets disbarred and prosecuted. She had limited immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. that may be an act along with the crying
poor little me, I always tried to be kind except when I was barring people from promotions because they were registered democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. McNulty has already shot back at Monica's testimony implicating him.
He isn't stupid, not by a long shot, and he knows the score.

Question is, what will get to him first? His desire to preserve his reputation, or some lucrative deal for falling on his toothpick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pathansen Donating Member (696 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think you might be right
So McNulty hasn't testified yet?
This could get pretty interesting. I understand that McNulty was quite unhappy with what Monica said about him during her testimony today. If he knows a lot, it might not have been very smart of her to use him as a scapegoat. It is also my understand that she only has immunity as long as she tells the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-23-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. It is what McNulty knows about the Rove involvement that will sink Gonzo/Sampson/Goodlin
McNulty is likely the smartest cookie of the bunch. He knows the score on all counts.

Think about this for a minute. It appears that McNulty is ready to resign, roll out of town remaining silent.

But Gonzo needs someone to hang the blame on, and it sure is not going to be the White House, Sampson is in the perfect position as the aggregator of the list to sink him, and Goodling was involved in the commission of the offenses. The immediate naming of McNulty as the 'scapegoat' means two things: He was the only top official left to blame to protect Gonzo, AND Gonzo and co-conspirators know that McNulty is unlikely to have already spilled more to Schumer and company that will be fatal to Gonzo hanging on.

I can see McNulty picking up on where this was headed and how it might end. If he did not stockpile the 'get out of jail free' evidence he would need later, I will be surprised. And now that Goodling has accused him under oath, the time to pull out the secreted evidence may have arrived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Alice S. Fisher too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Gonzo KNEW
and said at the hearing over and over he couldn't talk with anyone on his staff about this but tonight his spokesman admitted he talked with Monica. HE IS TOAST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. would having them all testify at the same time do something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. 100% correct
Edited on Thu May-24-07 08:32 PM by malaise
Monica was only interested in saving Monica. She's a self-absorbed clueless moran.

Change word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC