Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyers Depart Alaska as Miller’s Chances Dim

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 04:17 PM
Original message
Lawyers Depart Alaska as Miller’s Chances Dim
The lawyers have started leaving.

That is perhaps the surest sign that Joe Miller’s chances of becoming the next senator from Alaska are evaporating. With each passing day that election workers here in the state capital manually count write-in votes cast for Senator Lisa Murkowski, it appears increasingly likely that Alaskans spell too well for Mr. Miller’s math to work.

Assisted by lawyers sent by the Republican National Senatorial Committee, the Miller campaign set out to challenge every smudge, stray mark and misspelling they could find (and, often, only they could find) on write-in votes that appeared to be for Ms. Murkowski.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/13/lawyers-depart-alaska-as-millers-chances-dim/?partner=rss&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sarah's little crony is toast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. He may need those lawyers
He should be sued for false arrest of that reporter
He employed those guards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. How'd that trip to Washington to measure the drapes work out for you Joe?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. And once the lawyers are gone, only the cockroaches are left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Here's a link below to the Saturday end of day ballot totals
See comment #31 for the newest update:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4609904

They will be counting more tomorrow, I believe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. beat it, ya loser
too bad the "winner" sucks too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. But it feel oh so good knowing that Palin's boy lost ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, it is.
In a way, I was kind of hoping old Joe would pull it off, because he would have been much easier to beat in 2016. I'm sure we will be stuck with Lisa Murkowski for life now, which saddens me deeply. As Scott McAdams said during the campaign, "When Lisa votes 'no,' she's just like Joe."

I have little doubt that strings were pulled within the Division of Elections to smooth the way for Lisa, allowances that were made for her that were never made for earlier write-in candidates. I also have no trust of the Diebold GEMS method of counting votes which is in effect here. Every election since 2004, at least, has produced weird anomalies in the vote counts. This year it appeared that based on the number of ballots counted the turn-out was very low, one of the lowest mid-term election turnouts on record here, even though all of the campaigns had lots of enthusiasm and excitement. Anecdotal reports were that the voting stations were busy all day, at least here in Anchorage. I'm not going to get all conspiratorial, but we had troubles with the 2004 election, as well, when Lisa apparently defeated Tony Knowles, despite the fact that he was ahead in the polls up until the day of the election.

Things that make you go "hmmm..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC