Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats voting yes on the rule are the ones who are casting their vote to give Bush a blank check

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 10:18 AM
Original message
Democrats voting yes on the rule are the ones who are casting their vote to give Bush a blank check
Important! Watch the individual votes on this *rule*.

Read this last graph from Sirota; it is the whole ball of wax:


May 24, 2007


I'll do an update on the Iraq vote over at Working Assets later today when/if it happens. If you are watching C-SPAN, make sure to carefully watch the vote on the rule. All the Republicans will likely vote no - they want an open debate because they somehow think reiterating to America their steadfast support for the Iraq War is good politics. You are going to see a lot of Democrats stand up and berate the war, and say they really are voting against funding the war because they are voting against the predetermined Republican amendment. Yet, most of these Democrats will likely vote for the rule, which is the real vote for war. Democrats voting yes on the rule are the ones who are casting their vote to give President Bush a blank check.

Remember, all we need is 20 Democrats to vote no on the rule to send the bill down and start over. If that doesn't happen, then the question becomes which U.S. Senator is going to answer the "where's the beef?" question by putting their antiwar rhetoric into action by pulling an old-school, read-the-phonebook filibuster? Sens. Chris Dodd, John Kerry, Bernie Sanders and Russ Feingold seem to be girding for a big fight, while the Associated Press reports both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama "declined" to take a position. Will we see a real filibuster, or will we see capitulation in the upper chamber? Stay tuned.




And isnt' it interesting that as we speak, Bush is trying to distract us from this vote by jabbering in a hastily called *news conference?*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm listening to the House on C-Span.
I don't think this thing is going to pass. All the Dems I've heard so far say they are voting NO on the supplemental. Unless they are planning to say they're voting no and then cover it up by voting yes for the rule, this thing could very well fail.

I hope this is what happens! Those of you with Dems in the House, call them, call them, call them!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Are you able to jot down the votes in real time and post here? I've got a distraction here that I'm
trying to clear up. We've got to document how these people vote.


Hopefully, I can get back in time for the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. PLEASE keep us cube-ratsinformed on the rule vote and what's going down
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here is a convenient list of all Reps to use as a checkoff list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Final vote list here
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 418
(Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)

H RES 438 YEA-AND-NAY 24-May-2007 1:23 PM
QUESTION: On Agreeing to the Resolution
BILL TITLE: Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to H.R. 2206, making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007


(click the link for the entire list)

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll418.xml


With comments from David Sirota here


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. 24
Just 24 out of over 200 Democrats do not want to give Bush his blank check.

So 90% of the House Democrats are not on the side of the People who elected them?

Great.

Big tent my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC