Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For DUers who love to bash CNN as "pro Bush"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:34 AM
Original message
For DUers who love to bash CNN as "pro Bush"
Ed Henry's report yesterday on Blitzer was excellent:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0705/23/sitroom.01.html

ED HENRY, CNN CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Those are not really new, Wolf. it's just some new intelligence about some Al Qaeda officials. But those plots -- the president has previously touted stopping those plots. So this is really all about the president scrambling to find justification to keep U.S. troops in Iraq.

HENRY: Trying to bolster his case Al Qaeda is the chief enemy in Baghdad, the president declassified intelligence showing in 2005 Osama bin Laden was trying to set up a unit in Iraq to launch terror attacks against America.

HENRY: But detailing al Qaeda activity in Iraq in 2005, long after the war started, is fuel for Democratic presidential candidates, who charge, the war actually increased the terror threat.

JOHN EDWARDS (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: The worst thing about the global-war-on-terror approach is that it's backfired. Our military has been strained to the breaking point, and the threat from terrorism has grown, not lessened. We need a post-Bush, post-9/11, post-Iraq American military.

HENRY: With weak public support for the Iraq war, declassifying intelligence about terror plots enabled the president to fall back on a strategy that worked in the 2004 and 2006 campaigns: the fear card. BUSH: Here in America, we're living in the eye of a storm. All around us, dangerous winds are swirling, and these winds could reach our shores at any moment.

HENRY: But the president's decision to highlight bin Laden's ability to communicate with his top lieutenants raises questions about Mr. Bush's previous claims that the U.S. has disrupted the al Qaeda leader's activities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. You think one report balances out 23 hours and 50 minutes of Bush fellating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sticky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. re: CNN - I'm not back in the fold, but...
Edited on Thu May-24-07 11:43 AM by Sticky
The series on "Broken Government" last fall was a turning point for the American public. I think it influenced the 06 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. I agree.
I was shocked at the "Broken Government" series. If I was a Republican, I would have been pissed. It was perfect for promoting the Demcratic Party. However, so long as that Beck character isn't eliminated or balanced, I could care less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think Ed Henry has been duly noted here
as a pretty fair reporter. Notice the first blurb of his you quote though, he's correcting the ever faithful GOP water carrier, Leslie Blitzer, that this is not new information. Of course Blitzer likes playing golf with Pappa Bush so he's always gonna do his best to be a good little German.....

Let's hope Ed Henry doesn't start getting invites to play gold with the family.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. If it's not "new information", that means that someone leaked
classified information ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. CNN - the network that Swiftboated Kerry??
by turning a $40,000 ad buy into weeks of slander?

CNN - the network that still runs that Anderson Cooper ad where they say he will let us know "how much progress is being made in Iraq" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. The only thing I watch on CNN is Lou Dobbs....
I like when he gets pissed at the administration, especially when he voices his opinion about the separation of church and state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yes, I think that Dobbs is the only answer to Orally and the rest
on Fox. A host who freely expresses his opinions - whether you like them or not.

And then there is the practical aspect. If everyone will defect from CNN, then Fox will be the only game in town.

Almost like keep on voting for Democrats even while holding our noses, since the alternative is bad.

For all the bad things that Bill Clinton may have done, he did give us Ginsburg and Breyer on the Supreme Court.

No matter how much of a dislike we may have for the next Democratic president and the Democratic majority in the Senate, we know that a Scalia or a Thomas will not be appointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. The Daily Show is the most credible source of news these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. They aren't pro-Bush**, they're pro-business
Whatever the parent companies who are deeply embedded in our government thinks will help them, that's what we get. And there are plenty of Dems who'll answer their siren's call as readily as Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. That's right. People who think the major media outlets are just in it
for the ratings are badly mistaken. It has to do with much larger parent companies and how much they have at stake in the global corporatism racket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. You fogot about the other 49 out of 50 reports in which...
the Democrats are smeared. CNN also swiftboated Kerry in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Yeah - Let's applaud CNN for that 2% of fairness and ignore 98% spin and lies.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. so does that prove CNN is anti-Bush?
criticism of CNN is well-founded, and it's not based on anecdotal evidence, it's based on overall analysis of their bias.

You could find other such examples, and on the other hand you could also find counter-examples that show CNN often favors republicans.

For example:

http://mediamatters.org/issues_topics/outlets/cnn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. FUX and CNN used to be indistinguishable in Chimpy's heyday
Edited on Thu May-24-07 11:45 AM by npincus
CNN has gotten MUCH better, and Michael Ware's reports from Baghdad are the best MSM reporting on the war I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. so they toss out the occasional report that we like and everything's OKAY?
Uhhh, I don't think so.

They still look like Fox-lite 99.98% of the time. They've got a LONG way to go for the years of being propaganda poodles for the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I didn't say they were "okay" I said they've gotten "better"
Edited on Thu May-24-07 11:55 AM by npincus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. CNN is neither good or bad
I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omphaloskepsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Shouldn't we be bitching that CNN is anti-news.
I don't want any source of news to have any political bias. I want facts. I don't want spin. I don't want pundits. I want facts. I can make up my own mind based on facts. They just need to give them to me and they are failing.

Well, the BBC still works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. Fuck all corporate media.
They don't give a shit about anything other than delivering profits to their stockholders. They ceased to be relevant the day they made this their primary objective. You're actually better informed NOT paying attention to them at all. Fuck them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC