Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEC won't punish Ensign for cash to mistress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 05:15 PM
Original message
FEC won't punish Ensign for cash to mistress
FEC won't punish Ensign for cash to mistress


WASHINGTON -- The Federal Election Commission has dismissed a campaign finance watchdog group's complaint against Sen. John Ensign over a $96,000 payment his parents made to his former mistress and her family.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington announced Friday that the commission had dismissed its complaint against Ensign, his parents, his campaign and his political action committee over the money paid to Cynthia Hampton, with whom the Nevada Republican has admitted having an affair. CREW contended it amounted to an illegal political donation to Ensign.

The FEC said in a written statement that Ensign's parents considered the April 2008 payment to Hampton, her husband and their children a gift given out of concern for longtime family friends. Hampton's husband used to be an aide to Ensign.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/19/AR2010111904990.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Paying for sex is legal in Nevada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monique1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. FEC is as crooked as
the repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's kind of a stretch
Edited on Fri Nov-19-10 06:04 PM by hughee99
while their may be other violations here, calling Ensign's parents paying off a former mistress a "political contribution" is sort of a legal stretch, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not if he used political funds to make the payment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He didn't even pay it himself (according to the article), his parents paid.
The argument was that this payment should be considered a campaign contribution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC