Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This poll needs attention: Are the Repubs trying to sabotage Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:07 PM
Original message
This poll needs attention: Are the Repubs trying to sabotage Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Done! And you 'might' be able to vote more than once. Just sayin'. nt
Edited on Mon Nov-22-10 12:09 PM by babylonsister
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. He seems to be doing a pretty good job of that himself, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That's not what the poll asks for.
We would obviously answer it differently, if it did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama is doing fine on his own. This is no way the change I voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Do you agree with the START Treaty? What is wrong with the idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Signing treaties that GHWB implemented is not change. When he closes Gitmo and reverses don't ask
Edited on Mon Nov-22-10 12:23 PM by sarcasmo
don't tell I will feel my vote went for change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fruittree Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Nope...
when he does that, you'll likely still find something to complain about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Ouch that just hurts, you think all I do is complain, how will I sleep at night?
Edited on Mon Nov-22-10 05:26 PM by sarcasmo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fruittree Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I'm sure you'll find a way..
Or I suppose you can always complain about how tired you are tomorrow...:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Voted
A simple Yes or No vote would have been sufficient, but hey, its their poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Done. That's a crazy way to have a poll. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I know.
I have no idea why they split it up that way. But they do it all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. I chose the third option:
Is the GOP trying to stymie the president for political gain?

Yes. Republicans in the Senate and House refused the president's invitation to meet after the election. That says it all. Everything they're doing is intended to get him out of office. (61 responses)

29%

No. Republicans just want the president to respect the voters' mandate for change and take up important issues when the new Congress convenes. (60 responses)

28%

Yes. Republicans won't even vote to ratify an important arms agreement, even after getting the concessions they wanted. They're playing a dangerous game. (48 responses)

22%b


No. After all the harm this president has done there's good reason for Republicans to resist him. (45 responses)

21%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChoppinBroccoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. I Can't Tell If You Can Vote Multiple Times
I voted (it took forever to record the vote), and it showed that there had been 329 responses. Then I voted again, waited again, and it showed that there had been 332 responses. So I have no idea whether that second vote counted or not.

I may have screwed up, though, because I wasn't sure which "Yes" to vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. That is one of the worst constructed online polls that I've seen for a while.
Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh, you get some doozys from the paper.
One of my favorites is when they polled to find out what people thought about intelligent women staying home to raise their kids, or something incredibly stupid like that. The thing is, this isn't a Liberal paper. Conservatives must be worried about intelligent women staying home for some other reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. Only since he announced his candidacy for Prez.



WTF is wrong with these deniers?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. In public, they demand an end to the spending. In private, they are the beneficiaries
Edited on Mon Nov-22-10 05:53 PM by Liberal_Stalwart71
of most government subsidies, not to mention, they were responsible for the largest spending spree in the history of the federal government when they controlled Congress.

In public, the rail against the stimulus. In private, they beg Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood for more money for their projects and send letters to other federal government heads, asking for stimulus funds for their respective pet projects.

In public, they claim to want to reduce the deficit. In private, they voted against PAYGO; push for tax cuts for the very wealthy; want more defense spending; and haven't devised a plan to actually slash the deficit. As Rachel Maddow cogently put: watch what Republicans DO and REPORT it in the news; don't just report what they say, then paint what they SAY as news!!

In public, they claim to support small business and job creation. In private, they vote against the small business bills and want to reward big businesses and multinational corporations that send jobs overseas.

In public, they vocally called for policies like Cap n Trade; a health care mandate (Grassley and Hatch); a deficit reduction commission; and a repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell. In private, they filibuster and ultimately vote AGAINST these measures, even when these policies embody Republican ideals.

In public, they claim to support more bipartisanship and ASSERT that they want to work with the president. In private, they filibuster most of the president's nominated judges and agency nominees. And they work to bring about "Obama's Waterloo," and promise to "break him," and suggest that their TOP PRIORITY (PERIOD) is making sure that Obama is a one-term president.

So, we are asked whether or not there is a deliberate, concerted effort to sabotage and ultimately defeat President Obama and his agenda? The answer? HELL YES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinymontgomery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. I find it hard to believe
the question even needs to be asked. They said they are and will do what ever it takes to destroy him. Duh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC