Capitalocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 09:57 PM
Original message |
|
what the shit would I care about repealing a 3% tax cut?
|
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And if you probably would not have any earned income.
Just qualified dividends/bank interest/etc.
|
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. as David Kay Johnston said -- |
|
"3% of 0 is 0. These guys don't pay taxes now."
|
Hannah Bell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-01-10 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
15. um. they got 760 billion from someone. |
Drale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I haven't heard any rich people beside the republicans |
|
say they need a tax cut, it seems like the only reason the republicans want the tax cut is because they would benefit.
|
Liberal Veteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message |
4. My theory is that once you become a multi-millionaire... |
|
....you are visited by space aliens who say they will resurrect you after death into immortal life but only if your tax rate is at a certain level.
|
Capitalocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
literally laughing out loud. :spray:
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-03-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
Motown_Johnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
6. slippery slope, first back to the Clinton Era, Then to Reagan's first term |
|
then to Nixon's top tax rate
Now all of a sudden you are in a 70% bracket
OMG! How did we ever let this happen!!!???!?!?!
|
Capitalocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. At least someone's fighting. |
|
Funny, whenever I talk about a slippery slope, people call me an alarmist. :eyes:
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-03-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
18. It's nice to see someone is worried about the terrible dangers the poor oppressed rich face. |
|
OMG! Paying as much taxes as we paid under Nixon! That's COMMUNISM! :eyes:
|
AnArmyVeteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Rich people as a rule are obsessed with money. |
|
Wall Street is a cesspool of greed. Nothing is enough to them. Their entire lives are immersed in making money. They value nothing of true value, just the paper kind. Humans are irrelevant to them. If they could profit off the homeless they would. The reason why there is a huge debate over the elimination of the tax cuts for the rich is because of the unbridled greed and selfishness in the top 2 percent. The rich couldn't care less about the millions of people who are hurting (or dying) in this country. They have theirs and that is all they care about.
Three percent wouldn't matter to normal people like the middle class or the poor. But three percent to the rich would be like drawing all the blood out of their bodies. And to make sure their taxes do not go out they have sent out their army of political prostitutes in government to stop the Bush tax cuts from expiring. And what is sickening is how democrats will certainly cave in as they always do when confronted by the greedy and the evil.
|
Capitalocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Totally agree except for one point. |
|
3% would matter to the poor.
Maybe that's part of the problem... that the national dialogue is so focused on what's going on with the rich that we don't even talk about the poor.
|
AnArmyVeteran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. You're right of course, but I was figuring 3% of Zero = 0 |
|
But as you said, that three percent to someone pour means they would do without something they need. The rich wouldn't miss that 3 percent, but their egos would.
|
Capitalocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-01-10 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. 3% of 0 is 0... until they start getting creative. |
|
Man, I hope they don't implement a VAT. Extreme regressive taxation and political suicide, all in one convenient package.
|
EC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message |
10. They don't want the money... |
|
it's keeping the work force groveling that they want...
|
laughingliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-03-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
It is more about keeping money out of the hands of the lessers so they remain subservient to their whims.
|
Zanzobar
(276 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
11. What would you do with a 12 inch penis? |
Yupster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-30-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Nothing since you'd have your money in tax free bonds |
|
Only the kind that aren't exposed to AMT.
Five percent tax free on a billion is $ 50 million a year tax free.
Then you could go around saying taxes should be higher knowing you won't pay any anyway.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |