Loudoun Co. Official: TSA Pat Downs Are Part Of "Homosexual Agenda"

[Amerigo Vespucci]

Video HERE: http://fablog.ehrensteinland.com/2010/11/30/fait-diver-hey-eugene/

Loudoun Co. Official: TSA Pat Downs Are Part Of "Homosexual Agenda"



http://dcist.com/2010/11/loudoun_county_official_tsa_pat_dow.php

Loudoun County Board of Supervisors representative Eugene Delgaudio is angry about the TSA pat downs that were all the rage in the media during the busy Thanksgiving travel season. But it's not because he finds the pat-downs unconstitutional, or generally objects to America going too far in its dogged attempts to prevent terrorism. Nah, Delgaudio doesn't like the new TSA security procedures because he claims they are part of a wide-scale "homosexual agenda." Let's get crazy, shall we:

A widely distributed e-mail written by Delgaudio for the Public Advocate about TSA, claims the pat downs are part of a "Homosexual Agenda." And he criticizes TSA's non-discrimination hiring policy.

"It's the federal employee's version of the Gay Bill of Special Rights... That means the next TSA official that gives you an 'enhanced pat down' could be a practicing homosexual secretly getting pleasure from your submission," Delgaudio wrote.

In an off-camera interview, Delgaudio explained to WUSA9 that his assertion regarding this allegedly massive influx of "practicing homosexuals" getting off while sweeping your junk for explosives isn't representative of his position on the County Board of Supervisors, but is instead a stance he promotes as the President of Public Advocate of the United States, a conservative organization which offers Delgaudio a platform to comment on his belief that America is being overtaken by the ghey.

[Turbineguy]

1. Don't worry dude,

after it's privatized it will feel better.

[madrchsod]

2. really ........what can ya say about that!

[WinkyDink]

3. That guy ^^^^^? Lives in a closet.

[CurtEastPoint]

4. Urp. He'd be lucky if ANYONE touched his junk. n/t

[Dogtown]

5. Most respectable law enforcement agencies have

psych evals conditional for appointment.


Why don't we require the same for politicians?