Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why New Evidence Demands End to Wars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 11:08 AM
Original message
Why New Evidence Demands End to Wars
With Wikileaks Revelations, Peace Community Redoubles Demand for End to Wars and Voices Support for Whistleblowers

While only a tiny fraction of the U.S. diplomatic cables scheduled for publication by Wikileaks have thus far been made available, some conclusions can already be drawn. These cables and the Iraq and Afghan War Diaries provide an opportunity for Americans to see our government for what it is.

Our government is seen here as controlling a global military and espionage empire that impacts every region of the globe and deceives its own population. Secrecy, spying, and hostility have infected our entire government, turning the diplomatic corps into an arm of the CIA and the military, just as the civilian efforts in Afghanistan are described by Richard Holbrooke, who heads them up, as "support for the military." Secret war planning, secret wars, and lies about wars have become routine. The United States is secretly and illegally engaged in a war in Yemen and has persuaded that nation's government to lie about it. The United States has supported a coup in Honduras and lied about it.

We have long known that the war on terrorism was increasing, rather than diminishing, terrorism. These leaks show Saudi Arabia to be the greatest sponsor of terrorism, and show that nation's dictator, King Abdullah, to be very close to our own government in its treatment of prisoners. He has urged the United States to implant microchips in prisoners released from Guantanamo. And he has urged the United States to illegally and aggressively attack Iran. Congress should immediately block what would be the largest weapons sale in U.S. history, selling this country $60 billion in weapons. And Congress should drop any idea of "updating" the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force to permit presidents to unconstitutionally launch more wars. We see what sort of wars our allies urge on our presidents.

We learn that while dictators urge war, other branches of the same governments, the people, and the evidence weigh against it. We learn from a cable from last February that Russia has refuted U.S. claims that Iran has missiles that could target Europe. We learn from September 2009 that the United States and Britain planned to pressure Yukiya Amano, the then incoming head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, to produce reports suggesting Iranian nuclear developments, whether or not merited by the facts, and that National Security Adviser Gen. Jim Jones proposed the propaganda strategy of baselessly tying Iran's nuclear program to North Korea's.
Much of the pressure for war appears to come from within the United States, whose representatives treat the entire world as a hostile enemy to be spied on, lied to, and exploited. The secrecy that permits this behavior must be broken if the United States' approach to the world is to change. Those who have helped to fulfill President Obama's campaign promise of transparency must be protected from his vengeance, while those who have abused positions of diplomatic trust to advance agendas of espionage and war planning must be held accountable.

While other countries may offer residency and protection to Wikileaks' Julian Assange, it is the United States that has most benefitted from his work. We encourage U.S. cities to offer him sanctuary.

Our Department of Justice has granted immunity for aggressive war, kidnapping, torture, assassination, and warrantless spying, while pursuing the criminal prosecution of Bradley Manning for allegedly leaking materials to Wikileaks. Were our government to indict Assange or support the extradition or rendition of Assange from anywhere in the world to Sweden, while maintaining that his work and not the Pentagon's has endangered us, our nation's moral standing would reach a new low.

Our government should cease any actions it is taking to prosecute Julian Assange for absurd criminal charges, to pressure Sweden to do so, or to sabotage Wikileaks' servers. Coverups of leaks have a history in Washington of backfiring in the form of larger leaks and scandals. Our State Department should focus on diplomacy and mutually beneficial partnerships with the world community.

The undersigned express our gratitude to those doing the job a representative government and an independent media are each supposed to do. We demand an end to all overt and covert wars, a ban on the use of State Department employees and contractors in spying or warfare, and a full investigation of the facts revealed in the Wikileaks cables.

We support the protest of our current wars planned for December 16th, 10 a.m., at the White House.
Signed,
Medea Benjamin
Leslie Cagan
Tim Carpenter
Gael Murphy
Cindy Sheehan
David Swanson
Debra Sweet
Kevin Zeese
Ann Wright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. "The undersigned express our gratitude to those doing the job a representative government and
an independent media are each supposed to do."

Sign me up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm just starting to read some of the cables. The bombing's
in Yemen are most concerning. King Abdullah statements are equally concerning: "He has urged the United States to implant microchips in prisoners released from Guantanamo. And he has urged the United States to illegally and aggressively attack Iran."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
"It is useless for sheep to pass a resolution in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion." ~William Inge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind...
I'll put my Gandhi up against your playwright... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jotsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I rec'd this thread; early this morning.
Came back for a kick and to wish you a happy birthday! :party:

Thanx for all the good work you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. George W bush said it very clearly (Although with the Obama
Edited on Wed Dec-01-10 09:45 PM by truedelphi
Administration, if you read between the lines and view Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's OUTRAGE etc, the deal is the same.) "You're either for us or you are again us."

We the People are either for the big Corporations and for THE MIC standing on top of us, robbing us blind and destroying our lives or else we are terrorists who should be put out of our misery.

Rumsfeld wanted to make sure that environmental organizations and religious groups went on Terrorist Watch Lists.

Right now, being for peace will probably get you the same sort of attention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mosaic Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I salute the revelations
Exposing the imperial agenda, more clearly than ever. Americans are waking up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. To the fact that obama ended the war and Iraq and is working on
Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That Obama stopped the wars is such bullshit.
There will be permanent bases and a large embassy and mercenaries in Iraq.

The same is planned for Afghanistan. Why else build a >$500 million embassy in Kabul and continue base expansion?

Why lie about Yemen activities? We have reached an agreement with the Yemen government for a military base on an island they control at the mouth of the Red Sea plus the existing well-staffed and armed base in Djibouti and various FOL/FOBs already in operation in west and east Africa? Why lie about current military aggression and build-up by the USA in Africa? AFRICOM is a relatively new independent entity. Aside: Thought Cheney's indictment for Halliburton bribery in Nigeria surprising but telling.

And what about Latin America? Colombia has essentially ceded sovereignty over DoD basing agreements? President Garcia wants USA military in Peru for dubious reasons. Obama lied and Clinton misled about our role and support of the illegal Honduras coup. We have been fucking with Venezuela since 1998's Plan Colombia and to lesser extent with Bolivia and Ecuador. Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay are more aligned with Venezuela and closest allies.

We are in a planned perpetual war. Read the current USA Military Posture documents. Obama probably has little control but is smart enough to know the truth. The wars are class war domestically. 21st century war is eugenic in nature and will be more passive than violent unless there is a MAD event.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Eugenics and Marxisim in the same post.
amerikka thinking. What is a USA Military, never heard of such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Who mentioned Marxism? I didn't. You don't want others to read my post.
What did I state wrong in fact?

Never even used the phrase "USA Military"; used DoD but also -- as you know -- there are various covert operations in other agencies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R Thank you.....it's time for Americans to wake up! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dystopian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. KandR.
peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC