|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:25 AM Original message |
People are threatening not to vote for Obama because he hasn't done as much as they want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
HipChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
2. I was supposed to have my pony in the first 90days.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
243. He told us we'd get a pony, but he didn't tell us he'd be giving it to us in the form of glue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. In other words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:28 AM Response to Original message |
4. I was thinking of not voting for him for the things he is doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:33 AM Response to Reply #4 |
131. Correct. It's not the speed, it's the direction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtown1123 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
263. Thank you. It's not that he hasn't done enough. I am apalled at what he has done and terrified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
5. Huge K & R. The incoherence in their arguments knows no bounds. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Deleted message |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
6. Obama inherited the Catfood Commission did he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:31 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. I reject the premise of your question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. At least he didn't pull out the Palin Pony. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Deleted message |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 07:26 AM Response to Reply #25 |
222. Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Deleted sub-thread |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. I thought we were supposed to be bipartisan...embrace the Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:37 AM Response to Reply #10 |
29. You argue against the POSSIBILITY of political success EVERY DAY. Does that make you a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:38 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Making true statements about political probabilities does not enable Republicans by definition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #32 |
53. it's not possible to make a true statement about political probabilities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:49 AM Response to Reply #53 |
58. Even if you consider them opinions, VOTES are what enable or disable Republican candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #58 |
79. in your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:05 AM Response to Reply #79 |
89. Wait ... you are now saying that votes don't affect elections? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:10 AM Response to Reply #89 |
99. No, I'm saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:16 AM Response to Reply #99 |
104. No, that is not an opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:20 AM Response to Reply #104 |
112. It's a fact that he didn't win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:27 AM Response to Reply #112 |
122. "It's not a fact that he had no chance of winning." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:29 AM Response to Reply #122 |
123. You do not have a very good grasp of the concept of "fact" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:32 AM Response to Reply #123 |
130. Pot, meet kettle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:39 AM Response to Reply #130 |
140. Perhaps to you it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:42 AM Response to Reply #140 |
143. "a truth known by actual experience or observation; something known to be true" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:53 AM Response to Reply #143 |
155. Please fill us in on the observations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:01 AM Response to Reply #155 |
159. Is the existance of gravity a fact to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:02 AM Response to Reply #159 |
163. so in other words, you have nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:16 AM Response to Reply #163 |
167. Do you have an answer to my question? Do you accept the existance of gravity as a fact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:28 AM Response to Reply #167 |
185. You're dead wrong and don't understand the meaning of the word "fact." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:29 AM Response to Reply #185 |
186. Do you think the existance of gravity is a fact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:32 AM Response to Reply #186 |
187. A posteriori, by incredibly strong inductive reasoning, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:35 AM Response to Reply #187 |
189. A posteriori, by incredibly strong inductive reasoning, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:42 AM Response to Reply #189 |
191. No, your inductive reasoning, whatever it is, doesn't even come CLOSE to the law of gravity's, with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:45 AM Response to Reply #191 |
193. So you admit that the difference between us is simply a matter of degree in the amount of Bayesian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:16 AM Response to Reply #193 |
207. Well, no, I wouldn't say that I tolerate much uncertainty when it comes to the word "fact." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:41 AM Response to Reply #207 |
214. But of course all our observations could be wrong and only coincidentally match "gravity." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:50 AM Response to Reply #214 |
216. For all practical purposes, our observations about gravity are not wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 09:35 AM Response to Reply #167 |
225. It's just a theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:08 AM Response to Reply #58 |
95. Gore wasn't a "viable progressive candidate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:17 AM Response to Reply #95 |
109. I said the MOST progressive (in terms of degree). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:21 AM Response to Reply #109 |
115. The tone you're taking is the tone that loses elections for this party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:53 AM Response to Reply #115 |
154. "And repeating the phrase "enable Republican candidates" doesn't actually mean anything" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:51 AM Response to Reply #154 |
179. I believe it was you that told me just last evening that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:52 AM Response to Reply #179 |
180. I said the 60th vote (whoever that is) can dictate terms if that 60th vote has no interest in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 07:30 AM Response to Reply #180 |
223. The president has a veto pen and the threat of a veto. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 04:48 PM Response to Reply #223 |
265. You actually can't get middle class tax cuts using a veto pen. High school civics. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 11:10 AM Response to Reply #58 |
238. Pretty Naive if you ask me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:34 AM Response to Reply #10 |
135. Take responsibility for the Democratic party's failure to deal with their conservadems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Segami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #135 |
231. +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. What's wrong with it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Nothing. It's cute, and we love you for it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:34 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Adorable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. Seriously. You actually made me laugh! Spot on Forkboy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
11. he's digging the hole deeper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
18. Yeah, how dare people expect results in return for their work, votes and money? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:34 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Perhaps someday when the reach across the aisle results in being completely across it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
20. Slow night? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:34 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Maybe one of you will actually stay on topic. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:38 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Deleted message |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:39 AM Original message |
Link to proof Obama is actually running in 2012? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
24. There was a Republican president because our 2000 campaign was lame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. The third party lied, and the same lies are being told today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. "There's no longer any justification for it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:40 AM Response to Reply #27 |
35. What allowed Bush to do that was that Gore ran a terrible campaign and blurred the differences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:41 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Everybody is responsible for their own vote. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:41 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. If Nader dropped out, Gore would have won. That's ALL there is to it -- all this post-rational |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:42 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. I know, huh? The fucking nerve of people practicing democracy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:43 AM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Oh, he had the absolute right to enable Bush's win. That doesn't mean it was a good idea. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #43 |
54. Deleted message |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:50 AM Response to Reply #54 |
62. You act as if anyone has ever said that Nader didn't have the legal right to run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:02 AM Response to Reply #62 |
85. Yes, I changed the topic from Nader to...Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:06 AM Response to Reply #85 |
91. No, you changed the topic to the legal right of Nader to run, as if anyone disputed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:21 AM Response to Reply #91 |
113. No, it's not about what's legal, it's about what we're all told we can do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:23 AM Response to Reply #113 |
117. No one is denying Nader's right to run for office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:25 AM Response to Reply #117 |
120. How do you feel about the Dems in Florida who voted for Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:29 AM Response to Reply #120 |
124. Or, for that matter, the refusal of the National Democrats to EVER fight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:32 AM Response to Reply #124 |
129. Because, like Osama, they need an easy scapegoat that doesn't require looking at themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:33 AM Response to Reply #129 |
132. I'm fine with blaming all of them. All the dems who voted for Bush, all the SCOTUS justices... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:43 AM Response to Reply #132 |
144. I didn't vote for Nader, and wish he hadn't run when he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:49 AM Response to Reply #144 |
151. Oh, I wish we were much more progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:01 AM Response to Reply #151 |
160. As much as I like your answer here, it doesn't really answer my question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:14 AM Response to Reply #160 |
166. In my view, people are responsible for their own vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:20 AM Response to Reply #166 |
183. If he acts "moderate"(which is the same as acting conservative)he won't be ABLE to be progressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 09:37 AM Response to Reply #166 |
226. You're defending TARP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 04:50 PM Response to Reply #151 |
266. Is it POSSIBLE to "move the country in a progressive direction" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 04:59 PM Response to Reply #266 |
267. Oh, I don't know if it necessarily is on every issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 05:21 PM Response to Reply #267 |
269. Actually, you don't need constitutional amendments to bring in electoral reform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 06:00 PM Response to Reply #269 |
272. "In all likelihood, he's never gonna run again." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 06:15 PM Response to Reply #272 |
273. I stand corrected on the federal aspect of electoral reform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:34 AM Response to Reply #129 |
133. Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:48 AM Response to Reply #133 |
149. No, I meant Osama Bin Laden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:01 AM Response to Reply #149 |
161. Oh...sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
56. I'm practicing democracy by posting this thread. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:49 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. LOL...you're practicing something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:08 AM Response to Reply #59 |
94. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:17 AM Response to Reply #94 |
108. Deleted message |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #108 |
118. I said it was a hypothetical situation, didn't I? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:26 AM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Yeah, you were just throwing it out there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:48 AM Response to Reply #121 |
148. Why wouldn't I? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:51 AM Response to Reply #148 |
152. I can't see how you can think your posts are much more mature than that which you're decrying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:02 AM Response to Reply #152 |
162. I think it shows hypocrisy on the part of whoever did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:30 AM Response to Reply #94 |
126. er....what the hell...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:58 AM Response to Reply #126 |
157. What proof wouldn't just be dismissed by whoever wanted to dismiss it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:04 AM Response to Reply #157 |
258. You're not only getting WAY off-thread here, it was YOUR thread to start with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:50 AM Response to Reply #37 |
61. If Gore had chosen a Democrat as VP, he would have won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:51 AM Response to Reply #37 |
63. If the Supreme Court had bowed out, Gore would have won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #63 |
70. So the result is the fault of the Supreme Court... AND Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:55 AM Response to Reply #70 |
73. Your words, not mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 06:43 PM Response to Reply #37 |
278. How can you say that? If Nader had dropped out............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:43 AM Response to Reply #35 |
44. And why is Gore responsible for not exciting people enough, but Nader is not responsible for LYING? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:45 AM Response to Reply #44 |
49. It's enough to blame Nader as an individual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:13 AM Response to Reply #44 |
100. what lie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:17 AM Response to Reply #100 |
106. That there was little difference between Gore and Bush*. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:19 AM Response to Reply #106 |
110. and what were the differences, again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:29 AM Response to Reply #110 |
125. Bush* didn't believe in global warming; Al Gore was the first person to bring the issue to congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:34 AM Response to Reply #125 |
136. Ok, so ONE difference, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:41 AM Response to Reply #136 |
141. Actually, all the liberals on the court voted to keep money out of politics. Including Clinton's two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:46 AM Response to Reply #141 |
147. My arguments don't require that at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:17 AM Response to Reply #147 |
168. I never said Al Gore was actually inaugurated as President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 10:06 AM Response to Reply #168 |
230. Show your work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KILL THE WISE ONE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
28. i will support a primary challenger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
30. You can't just keep starting threads like this until everyone who voted for Nader has repented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:39 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I think he can do whatever he damn well pleases. His post does not violate the rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:41 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Because he tears DU apart everytime he stirs this shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:43 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. How is the fact that people have a hard time accepting the truth HIS problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:45 AM Response to Reply #41 |
47. What happened in 2000 is a dead issue. There's no reason to dredge it up again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:46 AM Response to Reply #47 |
50. Not if people are repeating the mistake. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:49 AM Response to Reply #50 |
57. You can't just say "progressives are OBLIGATED to vote Democratic even if the party disses them". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:52 AM Response to Reply #57 |
65. I can't, because they are not obligated. That's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:54 AM Response to Reply #65 |
71. What you SHOULD be doing is working to get the party to act in such a way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:56 AM Response to Reply #71 |
75. "Baiting people over 2000 can't make THAT happen." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:04 AM Response to Reply #75 |
87. You can't seriously argue that the party's conservativism played no role in the lost votes to Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:08 AM Response to Reply #87 |
93. "You make it sound like the Nader voters OWED it to everyone to settle for Kerry." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:10 AM Response to Reply #93 |
98. Beating the Republican candidate isn't all that matters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:21 AM Response to Reply #98 |
114. "And there has to be a limit to demanding that people settle for the "lesser evil"." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:24 AM Response to Reply #114 |
119. Stop repeating the word "enable". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:30 AM Response to Reply #119 |
127. I know you would like me to stop repeating the truth, but I am not going to do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:50 PM Response to Reply #127 |
253. A vote for Obama is a vote for the Right as well though, as he's all for tax cuts for billionaires, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 06:28 AM Response to Reply #119 |
221. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:31 AM Response to Reply #114 |
128. Want to know what REALLY enables Republicans once they're elected? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:36 AM Response to Reply #128 |
137. Yeah, except they wouldn't have been elected in the first place if it weren't for people who voted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:42 AM Response to Reply #137 |
142. None of them? No Republican would have been elected... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:44 AM Response to Reply #142 |
145. Ironically, not only did Nader enable Bush and Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:51 AM Response to Reply #145 |
153. I'm not the one spinning out Supreme court theories, you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:19 AM Response to Reply #153 |
169. "Ralph Nader didn't vote to authorize the war in Iraq." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 10:04 AM Response to Reply #169 |
229. Is that a "fact"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 06:17 PM Response to Reply #145 |
274. I don't remember Nader making Supreme Court appointees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:10 AM Response to Reply #137 |
165. So, it's only people who voted who are responsible for that election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:22 AM Response to Reply #165 |
170. Oh sure -- let me rephrase. People's voting/non-voting decisions are responsible for the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:33 AM Response to Reply #170 |
174. you know... you make me want to not vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:42 AM Response to Reply #174 |
176. As Barney Frank said (of Republicans): "Somebody hurt my feelings so I will punish the country." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:47 AM Response to Reply #176 |
177. no. that's not what I said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:49 AM Response to Reply #177 |
178. You said that I make you want to not vote. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:58 AM Response to Reply #71 |
78. Around 90% of the 2000 Nader voters did not repeat their mistake in 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:20 AM Response to Reply #78 |
210. We were damn lucky they did. They did it in spite of the contempt the party showed them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:55 AM Response to Reply #57 |
74. And "just barely not Bush*" is ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:06 AM Response to Reply #74 |
90. Al Gore wasn't a serious environmentalist in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:14 AM Response to Reply #90 |
102. WHAT?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:37 AM Response to Reply #90 |
138. OJFC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caretha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 09:58 AM Response to Reply #74 |
228. I agree "just barely not Bush" is ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:16 AM Response to Reply #57 |
105. oh good grief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Tell that to the people here who want to enable ANOTHER Republican victory in 2012. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:02 AM Response to Reply #52 |
84. please point out just ONE person here who wants to do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:38 AM Response to Reply #84 |
139. Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:58 AM Response to Reply #84 |
158. nothing in that post says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:25 AM Response to Reply #158 |
171. They want to vote in such a way that will enable a Republican victory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 09:30 AM Response to Reply #171 |
224. what difference does it make? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #171 |
233. No Dem is working harder to elect Republicans than Obama. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:27 AM Response to Reply #41 |
211. It's simplistic bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:50 AM Response to Reply #38 |
60. Please link to the post where I demand a purge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:39 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Why would I do that? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:45 AM Response to Reply #34 |
48. Because you admittedly use "troll-like tactics". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:47 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. What would I get out of a purge of 2000 Nader voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:51 AM Response to Reply #51 |
64. An erection? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. lfmao!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
39. And why did Obama appoint the "Deficit Commission" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obxhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
42. It's not a threat. It's not even a promise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:44 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. ... and it wouldn't have been before the courts if Nader dropped out. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obxhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #45 |
55. Blaming Nader for the failing of the courts and FL machines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:52 AM Response to Reply #55 |
66. I think people are blaming Nader for allowing the margin to be sufficiently close that the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
obxhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #66 |
81. You might as well blame chem trails in my opinion. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
46. I was waiting for "Is a shit statement". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:52 AM Response to Reply #46 |
67. FTW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
69. There was 8 years of a republican president b/c the Supreme Court gave the election to Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:54 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. So you would admit that it is SOMEWHAT at the feet of people who voted for Nader? Or are they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:05 AM Response to Reply #72 |
88. well, yes, they are free from blame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:15 AM Response to Reply #88 |
103. I guess denial is long-lasting. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:17 AM Response to Reply #103 |
107. Based on your commentary, it sure seems to be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:19 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. If you are referring to your denial about my commentary, you are indeed correct. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:22 AM Response to Reply #111 |
116. 1. I'm not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:06 AM Response to Reply #72 |
92. People have ONE WAY to speak to their govt that actually counts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:14 AM Response to Reply #92 |
101. "They don't and they don't get their votes." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:44 AM Response to Reply #101 |
146. It's not your fucking choice to make for anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:26 AM Response to Reply #146 |
172. WHERE did I say that it was my choice to make for everyone? I acknowledged MULTIPLE TIMES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:39 AM Response to Reply #172 |
175. I've never really tried to talk to you on this forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:03 AM Response to Reply #101 |
164. IT's not as simple as "enable Republican candidates" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:27 AM Response to Reply #164 |
173. It is that simple, notwithstanding your denial. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:15 AM Response to Reply #173 |
181. What enables Republicans is Democrats who run futile "tack to the center" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:18 AM Response to Reply #181 |
182. What enables Republicans to hold office is the voters who enable them. Not anything else. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:24 AM Response to Reply #182 |
184. What enables them is Democrats who campaign as if it's a disgrace to be progressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #173 |
235. It is not that simple, notwithstanding your assertion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
76. It's really too late now to blame it all on Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:57 AM Response to Original message |
77. at the end of the day most democrats will vote for the democratic candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #77 |
80. So too do I have the right to express frustration and anger at them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:00 AM Response to Reply #80 |
82. deal with the mockery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #82 |
96. I generally don't alert on personal attacks aside from those that accuse me of being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:00 AM Response to Reply #80 |
83. ok. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:04 AM Response to Reply #80 |
86. Deleted message |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
97. As much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamtechus (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
134. Obama and GOPers Worked Together to Kill Bush Torture Probe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:48 AM Response to Original message |
150. there was eight years of a republcan present b/c of a stolen election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
156. Oasis rejoices! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:33 AM Response to Original message |
188. Lo, what is your purpose on here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:45 AM Response to Reply #188 |
192. To remind us why we have no reason to bother. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:47 AM Response to Reply #192 |
194. Then you are giving up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:07 AM Response to Reply #194 |
202. I gave up on Obama long ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #188 |
234. To foment as much discord and division as possible. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 11:00 AM Response to Reply #234 |
237. I generally side with Obama and the Democrats, and so do 80% or more of liberals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #188 |
236. To promote strategic thinking and encorage people to participate in real-life politics. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:40 AM Response to Original message |
190. More like what he did do was the opposite of what we wanted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:53 AM Response to Reply #190 |
195. Rome was not built in a day and this President inherited 8 years of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:01 AM Response to Reply #195 |
198. I expect him to move in the right direction, not continue the mismanagement, collusion, and theft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:05 AM Response to Reply #198 |
200. He is trying to move in the right direction but even people in his own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #200 |
279. Expanding the war in Afghanistan is "trying to move in the right direction"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoseGaspar (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:54 AM Response to Original message |
196. Well, since zero is less than any, you are right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 03:57 AM Response to Reply #196 |
197. Why don't you try and take over the Presidency of the US, then you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:06 AM Response to Reply #197 |
201. But then he wouldn't be able to complain about things that aren't the President's fault! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:14 AM Response to Reply #201 |
205. I have to agree with you. This President really squandered his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoseGaspar (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #197 |
239. Any "response" which begins with... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:04 AM Response to Reply #196 |
199. He actually promised to look forward, not backward (at least 5 times) whenever asked about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:10 AM Response to Reply #199 |
203. Please do not get me wrong, I never thought President Obama would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:14 AM Response to Reply #203 |
206. My reply was to JoseGaspar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:17 AM Response to Reply #206 |
208. Yes he did but for what reason? To make more enemies! That was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:49 AM Response to Reply #208 |
215. You are correct that he didn't close Gitmo. But he certainly tried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoseGaspar (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 11:48 AM Response to Reply #199 |
241. I am not shocked that you find an equivilance between... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:11 AM Response to Original message |
204. What, no poll? How disappointing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:19 AM Response to Reply #204 |
209. What Poll? Most of us would get banned if we voted in a Poll! Only a matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:29 AM Response to Original message |
212. The Wikileaks show that he did not do the politically necessary things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:38 AM Response to Reply #212 |
213. Best response ever. Do you think Obama would heed your solution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 04:51 AM Response to Reply #213 |
217. Have you ever considered that most of the bipartisan "stick" is simply theatrics to try to win over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
akbacchus_BC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 05:04 AM Response to Reply #217 |
218. Sorry, I have no idea. Guess politics is not for the weak minded! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 05:11 AM Response to Original message |
219. The Presidency of the US, is now being run by the Bilderburg group which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 05:17 AM Response to Original message |
220. Obama's move will be tax cuts for the rich and SS. benefits removed from retiree's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 09:38 AM Response to Original message |
227. im done listening to excuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #227 |
252. See #251. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
232. I am not "threatening" to do anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
240. Because the same voters who are against Obama now probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
242. True it feeds on itself and is a circle that helps only Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
244. You have A point, but not the ENTIRE point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #244 |
249. And then Hemingway punched me in the mouth. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
245. Just a word from out west, where all our Democrats won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #245 |
250. That's interesting because in 2004 I saw somebody with a Nader/Camejo shirt and I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:59 AM Response to Reply #250 |
257. And that person NEVER knew why you did that, didn't switch to Kerry, and all you succeeded in doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crazyjoe (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
246. I wouldn't vote for Obama again, he has single handedly killed the democratic party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
247. (Your vote: -1) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montanto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
248. I've been flexible, I've been patient, I've been willing to wait, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #248 |
251. A lot of people are talking about their feelings without explaining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montanto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #251 |
256. ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:07 AM Response to Reply #251 |
259. Rather than bash those people and dredge up ancient history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 08:15 AM Response to Reply #259 |
260. Because that would simply prolong the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 03:00 PM Response to Reply #260 |
262. Coming up with a positive strategy for the next election would PROLONG the problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 04:46 PM Response to Reply #260 |
264. You see, the weird thing is, I AGREE with you that people shouldn't have abstained this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
254. Almost as good as one of your pro-Oasis threads in the lounge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #254 |
261. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-02-10 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
255. Kick, Rec. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
268. I was too late to rec this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steely_Dan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
270. You Just Don't Get It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babsbunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
271. I will not vote for him because he is Bush all over again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
275. These exquisitely nuanced, well-reasoned, and superbly articulated OPs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beforeyoureyes (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
276. People are not going to vote for Obama because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 06:52 PM Response to Reply #276 |
280. +1,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
277. We wanted him to START filling in the hole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC