peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:41 AM
Original message |
New rule, if an OP title has the words ' Obama says or Obama Wants to' then we need a link. |
|
What a waste of time to sift through OP's that site cable chatter as the official source. Cable folks make news to keep their jobs. Let's start posting the links people!
|
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |
|
and preferably a link to a source that actually is reporting what Obama says.
Sid
|
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message |
joeybee12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
3. New rule...forget this idea... |
|
So, when someone says that Obama said at a press conference, and there is not a story yet written up about it, we can't post? Like I said, forget that.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
4. and a link to video of him saying it, along with a certificate of authenticity signed by ..... |
|
I'm sorry but if his administration does it, the buck stops with him and he gets the blame or credit.
Obama Administration limits drilling of the East Coast. Yay! Obama Administration has failed to close Gitmo Boo!
that's how that works.
|
Autumn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Did Skinner change the rules? |
|
Sometime on the news shows there isn't a link right away.
|
obxhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Skinner? Why the user name change? |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Or finding one of the millions of federal employees or appointees |
|
and finding one statement they make and attributing to Obama a fervent desire to carry it out. It's to the point where Obama's head would be exploding from contradictions!
|
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Why would anyone unrec this? |
|
I guess divisive lies are OK with some people here? :shrug: Not surprising actually.
|
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. maybe they're unrecing the idea of individual users changing the rules |
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. I'm pretty sure it was just a suggestion |
|
Not to be taken literally. :eyes:
|
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Some of the responses to this have been pretty startling! : )
|
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. You have to know that I didn't think I was changing the official rules. |
|
Really? Really? The unrecommended on this thing means that people are happy to chase their tails and moan around here. I don't have time to listen to every cable channel to sniff the wind of change. Don't' document the garbage. It only makes DU look like Henny Penny!
|
pintobean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
21. The first rule of unrec |
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. Mmmm loves me some unrec! |
|
If you think that's funny, I alerted on my own OP.
|
pintobean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message |
9. do we have a "NEW RULES" police? Just wonderin'..or are you Bill Maher? |
|
is this Bill comedy?
Do I laugh now? Or do you pipe that in?
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message |
Little Star
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Link? We need proof that what you say is a waste of time really is a waste of time. |
|
Someone needs to get over themselves.
|
TorchTheWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
14. the Admins make the rules |
|
not you nor any other member. If you want to make rules you're free to create your own site where you can be the admin and make whatever rules you like. If you don't like the rules here, you're free to use some other site where the rules are more to your liking or create your own site where you can be the admin and make all the rules.
|
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
We can't make ourselves better unless someone makes us! Oh ya and don't forget...you're either with us or against us. Our famous pResident * loved those words.
|
TorchTheWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
37. sorry, it's not your site |
|
Don't like the rules, leave. This site isn't the government and shouldn't be held to the same standards. Comparing how this site operates to how the government operates or should operate is not only ridiculous but insulting to the people that own this site and allow you to use it.
Done with you.
|
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
39. We will all look so smart in brown! |
|
The high stepping will be trouble but after that I think we got it down!
|
lame54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
your title has those exact words - yet no link Should I alert?
:evilgrin:
|
Glassunion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Actually, I think we are owed two links. Wouldn't you say? |
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
26. Too funny. Good catch. |
asdjrocky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I remember people posting that video link again and again |
|
showing Obama saying he would not sign a health care bill without a public option. His words and promises are empty.
|
pinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
24. There is no rule about folks posting "cable chatter". But we do encourage members to cite |
|
reliable sources whenever available. Helps keep discussions on point to have a reference point. :hi:
|
AndrewP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Bill Maher? Is that you? |
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
27. OK! Obama demands: "The Bill I Sign MUST Include Public Option" |
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
29. Manufactured quote... |
|
He never said those words.
It really is fun.
Sid
|
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Addendum to your new rule. If a poster is quoting Obama... |
|
then the quoted words must match what Obama actually said, not what they think he said, or what they interpret him to have said.
Sid
|
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
31. You do realize that there won't be much to talk about around here |
|
if we implement your addendum don't you?
|
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
32. Yup. But sometimes you just gotta go with tough love...nt |
Dappleganger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
"what a waste of time"
You first.
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
34. I don't like the fact that you think you can make rules even though I think |
|
links are appropriate to back up facts. :shrug:
|
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
40. You don't really think that I think that I make the rules do you? |
|
Links are good. We have enough Obama hate around here the least they could do is throw a link on it.
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
42. I know you can't and your op was off putting. Thus my post. nt |
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
43. I'm sorry that I can't make my point clear enough. m/t |
MadHound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
35. Who died and made you admin? |
|
Who are you to make such "rules"?
|
philly_bob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Agree that too many posts contain speculation about what Prez will do |
|
as if it's accomplished fact.
I don't think OP was really suggesting a new DU rule.
|
ZombieHorde
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
38. President Obama said otherwise, so there. |
|
Just kidding, recommended.
|
peace13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-02-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message |