Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2 GOP Senators who are rumored to be gay, serve in the military and support DADT. . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:10 PM
Original message
2 GOP Senators who are rumored to be gay, serve in the military and support DADT. . .
. . .so if it is not repealed should they be discharged?

Given that a significant number of service members that were discharged didn't voluntarily come out, but were outed should these two be exempt from the policy?

I don't care to name these two Senators but a lot of folks know who I am talking about.

The policy sucks. Outing people is wrong. But I can't stand watching these two Senators opposing the repeal of DADT, while others who follow the rules have been involuntarily outed and face discharge.

Your thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'llname them...Graham and McConnell...come January, they'll have 3 - Mark Kirk...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Mitchie. Private fondles Private's privates
Chinless bastard can't grow a beard so he married one. Hypocrite chickenhawk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. He is not in the military is he?
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Well, neither is in in the military now...are you saying the two currently serve
both in the Senate and the military concurrently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. Graham for sure does
and I think Kirk does to. Both in the reserves which have the very same DADT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Almost, was discharged for an eye problem that you
get treated as an outpatient & they don't medically discharge you for,,, BUT rumor is that the cross dressing Mitchie was busted in Basic Training and being KY Senator John Sherman Coopers young protege things were arranged. Eye ache my Ear, could be another Cheech and Chong hit. ( If your in the service for under 180 days, it doesn't count. < I think that's the right # > )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyborg1966 Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Partially correct...
I remember from my AF days that if you are on active duty for under 180 days, you can get (approved by your commander) an Entry-Level Separation, which is an "uncharacterized discharge," meaning it's neither good nor punitive. It happens quite a bit with Basic Trainees who cannot adapt to the military. It's a lot easier to ELS them than to pour more time and money into trying to make them Soldiers/Sailors/Airmen/Marines/Coasties, for which they're completely unsuited. Sometimes it's the result of malingering, but much of the time it's the fault of recruiters under the gun to fill quotas who fudge enlistment contracts and examiners at MEPS who don't take enough time to assess the mental state of a recruit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Kirk is already there - he was sworn in this week, because Burris was appointed
and Kirk won the special election and the regular election.

Is McConnell in the service?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. That's right!
I'd forgotten that closet case was already embarrassing Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyborg1966 Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Colonel Lindsey Graham, USAF Reserve
I hadn't known about McConnell, but the last I knew, Lindsey Graham was a Colonel in the Judge Advocate General corps of the U.S. Air Force Reserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. If nobody asks, these two won't have to tell
I'm pretty sure I know who one of these guys is.

Who is the other one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. What was the criteria used to investigate those who were involuntarily outed?
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. If DADT isn't repealed, then they should be outed and discharged
Just like any other gay soldier. Just because they're Senators doesn't give them a free pass to break the rules. 'Cause even though the DADT policy is in place, you know they STILL actively hunt down teh gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Would that be something a significant number of people would get behind. . .
. . .the rumors about both Senators have been covered in the press before, so it would be so easy for members of the media to ask the question:

In light of the rumors swirling about Senator X and given the fact Senator X serves in the military and supports DADT shouldn't they be investigated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I feel it's a totally fair position for someone in the media to take
If there have already been rumors, then the military should be investigating them anyway. That's how other gays get outed in the military, generally, someone is either caught in the act, admits it or someone they wouldn't date turns them in and an investigation is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Exactly, a think if something has been covered in the media its raised to a certain level . . .
. . .that can't be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whats good for the goose is also....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. If anyone has any evidence, I would love for them to give it to the press
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. From things I've read over the years, you don't need evidence to start an investigation
Just a rumor of homosexuality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Then I think the military needs to explain as to why these two have not been investigated. . .
. . .and are not facing discharge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. One word, would be my guess
Senator... that buys a lot of safety, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. They're republicans.
Free pass. If they were Dems, they'd already be gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
42. That's what this guy does
Mike Rogers exposing hypocrites.



http://blog.blogactive.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well as of a month ago all it took was a rumor
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 12:30 PM by MadMaddie
to get outstanding soldiars kicked out.

These Senators have put themselves at the forefront of a civil rights issue. I have no sympathy for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Same here.......Out them to the world....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Perhaps you should write a letter to the editor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm open to that. . .are others?
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wait, Senators who serve in the military?
Aren't both senatoring and soldiering full-time jobs? Or are they honourary soldiers, or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Reservists maybe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Mitch McConnell
McConnell became a member of the 100th Division (Training), U.S. Army Reserve, in Louisville, Kentucky, during his final semester of law school; and he reported for his six months of active service, primarily for training, in July 1967. After induction at Fort Knox, Kentucky, McConnell was released early from his active-duty military service in August 1967.<4> In August 1967, U.S. Senator John Sherman Cooper (R-KY), for whom McConnell had interned, wrote to the commanding general at Fort Knox, asking when McConnell would be "cleared" from active duty to attend New York University. Consequently, McConnell completed no actual military service. According to a former campaign manager, McConnell received a medical discharge for optic neuritis, which is a symptom of multiple sclerosis.<5>

From Wikipedia

Representatives from McConnell’s office offered two differing statements regarding McConnell’s discharge.

“Senator McConnell had polio as a child and he never served in armed services.” said Robert Steurer, press secretary for McConnell in Washington. “I am not aware of him ever serving.”

Kyle Simmons, McConnell’s campaign manager in Louisville, offered a different story about the senator’s military record during a phone conversation yesterday.

According to Simmons, McConnell enlisted for four months of active duty with the Army reserve at Fort Knox.

Simmons said that McConnell failed his physical examination as a result of a doctor’s diagnosis of McConnell having the medical condition of optic neuritis.

http://www.hillbillyreport.com/blog/2007/02/senator_mitch_m_1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Who cares if he's gay?
That there is the profile of a chickenhawk draft dodger.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I don't care one bit that he is gay...but I do believe he and Graham
are hypocrits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. Head of nail, hit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. They are both reservist and use their military credentials to drive their political careers
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Graham,,,,,,,
Lindsey O. Graham was elected to serve as United States Senator on November 5, 2002.

A native South Carolinian, Graham grew up in Central, graduated from D.W. Daniel High School, and earned his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of South Carolina in Columbia.

Graham logged six-and-a-half years of service on active duty as an Air Force lawyer.

From 1984-1988, he was assigned overseas and served at Rhein Mein Air Force Base in Germany. Upon leaving the active duty Air Force in 1989, Graham joined the South Carolina Air National Guard where he served until his election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1994.

During the first Gulf War, Graham was called to active duty and served state-side at McEntire Air National Guard Base as Staff Judge Advocate where he prepared members for deployment to the Gulf region. His duties included briefing pilots on the law of armed conflict, preparing legal documents for deploying troops, and providing legal services for family members of the South Carolina Air National Guard. He received a commendation medal for his service at McEntire.

Since 1995, Graham has continued to serve his country in the U.S. Air Force Reserves and is one of only two U.S. Senators currently serving in the Guard or Reserves. He is a colonel and is assigned as a Senior Instructor at the Air Force JAG School.

http://lgraham.senate.gov/public/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazyjoe Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. it's ok as long as we are outing republicans, or people who support republicans,
or people who have friends that are republicans, or people who have kids that have attended a tea party, or are republicans, or anyone who has ever watched Bill Oriellys show, or listened to at least 30min of Rush's show, or.............
or maybe, just maybe, If we believe something is wrong, and shutter at the injustice shown to gay people, we don't go around pointing fingers at people screaming "GAY GAY GAY" !!!!

I have to say, of all the hypocrites I see on this site acting like republicans because "they do it" and "they are hypocrites, so it's ok" (haha, <<facepalm>>), this one about outing gay people is the most ridiculous.

I'm embarrassed for you (you know who you are)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Generally speaking, I despise "outing"
But people who build their career on homophobia, and who advance themselves through selective discrimination against other gay people, knowing that they're protected from the same sort of discrimination by dint of their position or their friends, deserve whatever happens to them. If there are people in the Senate who have advanced their political careers and personal fortunes by practicing discrimination that they themselves would be subject to if not for their position or their friends, I hardly think it ridiculous or hypocritical that they should get a little taste of what they've inflicted on others. After all, nobody in the Senate is going to lose his seat or his pension or his benefits simply by being outed. None of them are likely to get beat up by their colleagues in the Senate Cloak Room. They will be subject to public embarrassment, but that's hardly on the same plane of what a service member risks by a charge (even without evidence) of being gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Agreed. Out them.
They are doing harm to other LGBTQI people and deserve no protection from our community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazyjoe Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Generally speaking, I despise "outing"
thanks for making my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Uhm . . . sure
Tell you what, when you're back on planet Earth from your perfect world where oppressed and oppressor never overlap, we'll all sing a round of Kumbaya and hope real hard that people safeguarded by their power and position don't abuse it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. As a lesbian I will be the first to say...
Some closeted gays DESERVE to be outed. That being said, this whole discussion is about why when there are rumors about allegedly gay Senators who also happen to be reservist members of our military, why are they not being investigated just like the other service members? A rumor is enough in the military for an investigation into one's homosexuality. So, why aren't these Senators being investigated? It actually has nothing to do with being outed--at this moment. If they are discharged because they're gay, that's another issue where privacy comes in.

You need to watch the following documentary to see what "closeted" gay politicians have been doing to the gay community and they needed to be outed...
Outrage argues that several American political figures have led closeted gay lives while supporting and endorsing legislation that is harmful to the gay community. The film examines mass media’s reluctance to discuss issues involving gay politicians despite many comparable news stories about heterosexual politicians and scandals. Outrage describes this behavior as a form of institutionalized homophobia that has resulted in a tacit policy of self-censorship when reporting on these issues.
http://www.hbo.com/documentaries/outrage/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. I've heard of at least 15 GOP senators who might be gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. What's this? Have you guys begun trying to out-GayBait each other now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. I'm just starting a rumor....now everyone else can pass along this "rumor" they heard
that at least 15 GOP senators are gay. Aren't rumors great? You can start them yourself, everyone passes them along, and most people beleive them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC