Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blue Dog Dems VS Repug Voting Record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:04 PM
Original message
Blue Dog Dems VS Repug Voting Record
I'll take a Blue Dog Dem that votes for the Dem agenda 60-100% over a rethug that votes with the dems 0-5% of the time

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_20090803/ai_n35525122/

HR 2: State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)- The passage of SCHIP was the beginning of increased government interference in healihcare. SCHIP increased the cost of tobacco products in order to offset the $35 billion dollar expansion of the program. The Washington Post reported that GOP critics said the "proposals will slow the economy, dramatically increase the deficit and make health care worse for the millions who already have insurance." 96% of all Blue Dogs voted for the expansion with Hoyer.

HR 384: Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) - Set conditions for using the second $350 billion of the $700 billion TARP bailout provided to failing banks, insurers, and automakers that included huge amounts of money spend on localized projects that had little to do with the failing economy. 82% of all Blue Dogs voted with Hoyer.

HR 1: Economic Stimulus - $787 billion spending package (the largest in U.S. history) that Democrats said was needed to restore the ailing economy. Not one House Republican voted for the bill. 80% of all Blue Dogs voted with Hoyer for the spending package.

HR 1: Economic Stimulus Substitute Republican alternative to stimulus package that pushed for economical growth by way of investments rather than taxation. 96% of aJ] Blue Dogs voted with Hoyer against the substitute.

HR 1 105: Fiscal 2009 Omnibus Appropriations - This $410 billion bill passed with over 8,500 earmarks. 69% of all Blue Dogs voted with Hoyer for this bilL

HR 1106: Mortgage Loans Modification - Passage of this bill gave bankruptcy courts the authority to modify the terms or reduce the principal balance of a homeowner's mortgage. It permitted homeowners to file bankruptcy if the current value of their home is less than the amount owed on it. By doing this, banks have affectively lost their ability to write and have borrowers keep the terms of their loans. 68% of the Bhie Dogs who voted, voted with Hoyer.

H Con Res 85: Fiscal 2010 Budget Resolution - Obama's $3.6 trillion budget included large tax increases on small businesses, proposed a $646 billion tax on families through "Cap and Trade" legislation, and a resurrection of the Death Tax. Again not one House Republican voted for the bill, but 73% of the Blue Dogs who voted, voted with Hoyer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. no no no. haven't you been paying attention. we'd be better off if none had ever been elected
even, apparently, if that meant none of those bills had passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. You would probably take being in charge of the house and senate
to being the minority party as well. I know I would
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe if they'd been more consistenly Democratic
Their constituents wouldn't have voted out quite so many of them. Better the genuine article Republican motherfucker than some ersatz stand-in, yanno?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. If they'd been more consistently Democratic, more of them would have been thrown out.
They occupy the most Republican districts, remember? The crap going around DU that somehow people wanted a congress farther left, so they elected the most extreme right-wing Republicans they could, is simply nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well, we'll certainly never know
Because the Blue Dogs in particular ran such spirited campaigns against their own party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting. I had 1 rec earlier, I seem to have 2 supporting comments but 0 recs..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You fucked up. You made a positive comment about Democrats on "Democratic" Underground.
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 06:20 PM by 11 Bravo
That's a guaranteed unrec magnet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. You will; many of us won't any more.
I'd rather see a Democratic Party that has a "brand" that
actually *STANDS FOR SOMETHING* again, instead a party
that can accommodate politicians who would be happier
being Republicans.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Nancy Pelosi passed tons of legislation that got blocked in the Senate. Don't blame blue dogs for
Harry Reid's weakness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC