Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mr. President: The Republicans are trying to destroy you

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 10:55 PM
Original message
Mr. President: The Republicans are trying to destroy you
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 10:55 PM by ProSense

Mr. President: The Republicans are trying to destroy you

by Laurence Lewis

The reality is that the Republicans know that for one of them to return to the Oval Office, and for their party to retake one or both houses of Congress, this presidency must be perceived as a failure. The consequences to the country of this presidency actually being a failure are irrelevant to them. They want it to fail. They work for it to fail. They know that any successes by this president undermine their party's chances, so they will do their best to prevent any successes, in any ways they can. The Republicans are a party that impeached a twice-elected president for lying about sex. There is no depth too low, and no sewage too rank, for their pernicious partisan wallowing.

Despite his attempts at bipartisan comity, the Republicans have undermined President Obama in every way they have deemed it possible. They spent half a year pretending to negotiate health care reform, and then, despite his compromising and capitulating in countless ways, they didn't give him a single vote. No matter his intentions, theirs remain singular and monomaniacal. They want his presidency destroyed. They want his agenda destroyed. And as they proved with President Clinton, if they consider it necessary in the pursuit of their aims, they won't hesitate to try to destroy President Obama, personally. That's who they are. If they weren't that despicable, they could not perpetually pursue their despicable agenda.

Republicans aren't interested in bipartisanship. They will not negotiate in good faith. They see any Democratic attempts at bipartisanship as but unilateral surrender. Their base is comprised of theocrats and kleptocrats. The former believe they are doing divine work. That never ends. The latter want to hoard every last bit of material wealth they can steal. They literally want to own the world. That admits no compromise.

We liberal critics of some of the president's policies and strategies want very badly for him to succeed. We understand the necessity of his succeeding, both on policy and political grounds. We want him to strive for ideals because we believe doing so would be best, both on policy and political grounds. We want him to stop reaching out to Republicans because we know their goals are the exact opposite of ours, both on policy and political grounds. They want him to fail. Their careers and livelihoods depend on his failing. There is no strategy they won't pursue, if they think it will increase the odds of his failing. His failure is their singular goal.

<...>

(The worst thing about this? I first posted it in December of last year.)

December last year?

Daily Kos: "A Dangerous President" Howard Zinn Warned Us

There is even the obligatory "cult of personality" reference.

Summary: Republicans want to destroy you. "Liberal critics" are trying to create the perception that you are a failure, weak and "dangerous" because we want you to succeed?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't feel sorry for him. He helped REVIVE a dead political party
The voters kicked Reaganomics and the Republican party to the curb in 2006 and 2008.

They cleared the battlefield for Obama and the Democrats...


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Republicans didn't lose by NEARLY as much as Democrats did many times in the past.
According to your logic, when the Republicans lose the popular vote by around 7 points, that's the end of their party. But when Democrats lose the popular vote by over 20 points multiple times in the past, that was just a coincidence/bad candidate/etc etc etc.

In reality, in a two party system, there will always be two parties. One party will come back when voters get tired of the other party. Rinse and repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It wasn't him and
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 11:08 PM by ProSense
there is nothing about the President's policies that represent trickle down. Nothing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Paging Dr. Freud
there is nothing about the President's policies that represent trickle down


lol what are you talking about?

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wasn't that clear?
Can you point to such policies if they exist?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, he should fail
He should fail at increasing the war, protecting bush and cheney, protecting BP, fail at leaving the voting machines and the oil in place, and fail with his weeny bipartisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Actually,
he should succeed at ending the wars and enacting sensible policies. I'll leave framing failure and cheering it on to Rush and the RW.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ending the war (s)?
When did he do that? He sent more troops to Afghanistan and started drones in Yemen.

Basically, what progress I have seen comes mainly from Pelosi and Reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, ending the wars
You do want him to succeed at that, don't you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I want him to succeed on that before 2014, if he is still in office then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yeah, me too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. But, that isn't going to happen.
We already know it will be at earliest 2014.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
6.  I think it is in everybody's best interest that our President is successful...
But America can't be successful or move forward when so many are unemployed and their jobs are being outsourced without any reprecussions to the American co. doing this...... America can't be successful with every penny striped from them in salary freezes, outpriced healthcare, and medication, overpriced food and energy prices..... If the President is going to be successful it has got to be because he stopped to help those who most need it..... He can do it. He has our support....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC