Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eight Years Later, Washington Post Still Defending The Saddam-Niger-Yellowcake Story ("Fair Game")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 07:48 PM
Original message
Eight Years Later, Washington Post Still Defending The Saddam-Niger-Yellowcake Story ("Fair Game")
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/12/04/eight-years-post/

Eight Years Later, Washington Post Still Defending The Saddam-Niger-Yellowcake Story
December 4th, 2010 at 11:45 AM by Matt Duss.

I’ve not seen the new film Fair Game, the story of how CIA agent Valerie Plame was outed by the Bush administration by way of discrediting her husband Joe Wilson’s public contradiction of one of the administration’s multiple false claims on Iraqi WMD, so I can’t speak to how much it does or doesn’t play with the truth of what happened.

This, however, from the Washington Post’s editorial “review” of the film, is pretty clearly dishonest:

The movie portrays Mr. Wilson as a whistle-blower who debunked a Bush administration claim that Iraq had tried to purchase uranium from the African country of Niger. In fact, an investigation by the Senate intelligence committee found that Mr. Wilson’s reporting did not affect the intelligence community’s view on the matter, and an official British investigation found that President George W. Bush’s statement in a State of the Union address that Britain believed that Iraq had sought uranium in Niger was well-founded.

“Well founded,” I suppose, in the sense that (some in) Britain “believed” it. But as we now know, and as the Washington Post itself has reported, our own intelligence agencies, as well as those of other countries, were highly skeptical of the claim.

Maybe the Washington Post’s editors should try reading their own paper. From April 2007:

Dozens of interviews with current and former intelligence officials and policymakers in the United States, Britain, France and Italy show that the Bush administration disregarded key information available at the time showing that the Iraq-Niger claim was highly questionable.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cheney and his boys created the entire yellow cake myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. What's really sad is allegedly intelligent people don't realize how ludicrous they look
parroting lies long since disproved. That beltway fog must be some powerful narcotic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
social_critic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. The official british investigation used an internet search engine as a source
It was hogwash. The yellow cake story was cooked up in Italy, by US neocons linked to the Bush administration and pro-war lobbyists. Judith Miller at the NY Times, and William Kristol at the Weekly Standard were linked closely to the campaign of lies leading to the Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Hissyspit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm with WaPo on this. I mean, we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud!!
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomThom Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. saying that Britain believed what we told them is true
what is not true is that Iraq tried to by yellow cake from Niger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, that's fun! The WaPo editorial says "Hollywood has a habit of making movies about historical
events without regard for the truth; "Fair Game" is just one more example. But the film's reception illustrates a more troubling trend of political debates in Washington in which established facts are willfully ignored" -- and the webversion of the editorial hyperlinks to a WaPo movie review as evidence

Well, then, what does the movie review say? It says: "The movie holds up as a thoroughly researched and essentially accurate account -- albeit with caveats"

:rofl:

WaPo's editorial board seems to have a reading comprehension problem

Hollywood myth-making on Valerie Plame controversy
Friday, December 3, 2010; 8:54 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/03/AR2010120306298_pf.html

'Fair Game' gets some things about the Valerie Plame case right, some wrong
By Walter Pincus and Richard Leiby
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 7, 2010
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/04/AR2010110407989.html?sid=ST2010110407718

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. They get away with it because most
Americans don't pay attention beyond todays headline and have forgotten yesterdays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC