Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Assange's Lawyer Tells The BBC WikiLeaks' Insurance Secrets Are Equal To A "Thermo-Nuclear Device"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 12:52 PM
Original message
Assange's Lawyer Tells The BBC WikiLeaks' Insurance Secrets Are Equal To A "Thermo-Nuclear Device"
Wikileaks' Julian Assange to fight Swedish allegations

December 05 2010 Last updated at 13:12 GMT

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange will fight attempts to take him to Sweden to face rape allegations, his lawyer said.

Mark Stephens told the BBC that legal moves against his client seem(ed) to be a "political stunt" by a state that allowed US rendition flights.

He warned Wikileaks could release more secrets in a bid to protect itself.

=snip=

Mr Stephens warned that the organisation held further secret material which it regarded as a "thermo-nuclear device" to be released if it needs to protect itself.

Full article (including short clip of the interview): http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11921080
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. What an unfortunate description
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. I think it was just a metaphor.
I hope it is as big as is being touted. I know the elite war-gamers are sweating bullets. It really is a beautiful thing to witness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Well, you can bet computers all over the word are trying to crack the "insurance file"
to see if there are any thermonuclear secrets there, literal or figurative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the redcoat Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fox News tomorrow: "Julian Assange has WMDs" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Meh, it it wasn't this, it'd be something else.
FOX News is gonna find some angle to make vicious attacks - might as well give them a reason since they're going to attack anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. This goes to show it's all about Assange.
He isn't in it to do anything but promote himself. If he were there would be no 'insurance secrets'. Whatever those may be would be leaked en masse to the public like the Iraq dumps were. But no, now he orchestrates the dumps, categorizes them. And keeps what he wants for himself as insurance. Playing politics with the world, an egotists wildest dream come true.

The man is a fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bullshit. Assange is not an inconvenient idiot. He and the Wikileaks
Edited on Sun Dec-05-10 01:25 PM by snagglepuss
staff understood from the getgo what they would be up against. You may want to reflect on the fact that ancient Greeks considered cleverness was associated with the heroic. Ancient Greeks lauded those who used cleverness to outwit enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The ancient Greeks are dead, the egotistical Aussie has emerged
as the hero of the moment. He's a charlatan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Hilary is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. No, but if I was the left would be begging me to primary Obama.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. Touche
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
42. The "Left" is no more interested in Clinton than they are in Obama.
Obama is President because "the left" rejected Hillary otherwise she is having McShame over for drinks and kickin it with The Family at the Whitehouse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
48. Clinton? Isn't she the one with her ass hanging out because of Assange?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
56. Not this lefty. I would'nt vote for another DLC'er if they were the only one on the ballot. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
66. no we wouldn't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
70. Wow... You Are Soooo... 2008
Things have changed, haven't you heard?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
57. Here's something to help you stay ignorant of whatever truths you fear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
65. lol, sad.
Edited on Sun Dec-05-10 08:06 PM by krabigirl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. What you said,
Snagglepuss! Why folks would diminish, demean what he has done, is beyond me. This man has put himself, his mother, his son, in danger by his actions! He needs to be heard and the US government needs to back the fuck off...IMVHO!

Jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
67. I am baffled by the same thing. That pols, kings and prices worldwide are exposed
as greedy ignorant crooks and thugs is something we all should celebrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
74. snagglepuss
snagglepuss

The ancient Greeks also was talking about something called Hybris.. If you climb to high, you migh be burn by the sun as you was over your head

I hope mr Assage are not over his head on this, even tho I fear he might be couth by the same thing that the anciens greeks warned against, time, and time again. Hybris

Diclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. The only people making it about Assange are those engaged in personal attacks upon him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, his own lawyer made it perfectly clear...it is about Assange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. and he needed a lawyer because...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Playing politics with the world is dirty business.
Keeping back 'insurance secrets' isn't transparent. It's playing games. The hero has feet of clay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Wikileaks has said all along that they were not interested in releasing documents
that would compromise national security or put a human's life in danger.

So far, each of these cables, before release, have been reviewed by journalists from 6 news organizations (NY Times, Le Monde, The Guardian, El Pais, Der Spiegal, and Wikileaks). In some cases, names have been Xed out and text removed.

Wikileaks is threatening to release everything, without review, if their news organization is shut down and/or their editor in chief loses his liberty or life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Then your post just made a liar out of him.
First saying not interested in compromising national security.

Second saying they are threatening to release everything.

The more people try to protect him, the more his game is put out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. It is called defense. The U.S. government is currently attacking Wikileaks and if it
harms them, Wikileaks will retaliate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You can try to protect his motives all you want.
I disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. You mean like our truth-telling State Department does?
It appears that the ones fighting "transparency" are found in the State Department, the White House, and congress...not in the places that Assange frequents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
68. Gee, why would a lawyer defend his client. Oh, wait, that's his job.
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
44. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
60. sadly, he's doing a pretty good job of ensuring it's all about him-
He could put an end to the drama any time he wanted. If wikileaks isn't "him" then those who are doing the work would continue to do their work, and go about their business.

If the organization can't operate without him, then doesn't that make 'him' wikileaks?- you can't have it both ways.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
72. no, the people here most happy about what Wikileaks is doing
are the ones who keep using the name "Assange" instead of "Wikileaks" as if Wikileaks IS Assange. I'm starting to get perturbed that these people so thrilled about what the PEOPLE OF Wikileaks are doing has suddenly become what ASSANGE is doing as if it's all about HIM. HE's the hero, not all the other people that are part of Wikileaks. He's said himself that he's just the spokesperson yet over and over the biggest fans of Wikileaks are inserting HIS name and calling what Wikileaks is doing HIS doing and pointedly not even mentioning all the other people of Wikileaks or even Manning who got the documents in the first place.

The biggest supporters here of Wikileaks have themselves made it all about HIM.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
76. I agree completely. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. right, he's either a full-on martyr or a full-on fraud
no middle ground
got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. He's being VERY smart. The best protection is to be in the public as much as possible
and as often as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. More ad hominem nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. You bring up an excellent point, jaxx.
The guy should release everything -- at once. Playing games with the material makes the information -- the truth -- into a bargaining chip.

It isn't about him, per se. It is about his -- and our -- right to know and to communicate.

He's being smart, for personal protection. And, from a public relations POV, it makes perfect sense to let things out one at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. PR has nothing to do with it.
He is playing the world, threatening security. I don't care what motive he tries to use, it's his 15 minutes and he's making the most of it. I can't believe how people are being taken in by such a ruse. His 'insurance secrets' threat has completely outed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. There is no security threat.
The insurance secret, and the world's reaction to it expose them for what they are. They are each thinking of how dirty their hands are. They are remember the blood on their decisions, the lies, the dead. They don't know what the next leak could hold, but they know there is plenty of shit on every one of them and that scares the absolute hell out of them.

He is playing the world leaders perfectly. I am much impressed with his tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Then you've read the insurance secret?
Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. You allege he is threatening the security of the world without any evidence.
The burden is on you to show there is a security threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. No, it isn't. His lawyer said it all.
I hate it when people try to play word games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. His lawyer said it is a 'thermonuclear device'.
You don't think that there is an actual thermonuclear device in the insurance file do you? How would that even work. Obviously, the lawyer is saying it is something big and should make world leaders nervous.

That is not the same thing as a world security threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Security threat? Not to us. To the criminals in government, it's a threat to their security.
Totally different from national security which never has been seriously threatened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
51. Bwaaaaaaah Ding Ding
The shit is about to hit the fan. Men are scared shitless.
Can you imagine the top dogs - what is he about to release about us?

The robber barons at BOA must be terrified. I can't wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. The reason why this release is slow is because each cable is being reviewed
by journalists from 6 news organizations. Information that would put a person or persons in harms way is removed.

Here is a description of the process from El Pais (sorry for the poor Google translation).

"A daunting task

The material to be reviewed requires a daunting task. Cables are 250,000, , many of them lengthy reports that must pass the filter of a newspaper edition in order not to endanger human life. The information is stored in plain text CSV (comma-separated English values), a lot of files stored in rows separated by commas that make the text more closely resemble an Excel file with tables, a text legible. It is essential the work of the technicians who make them analyzable documents for journalists.

With the material chosen Wikileaks newspapers to publish. No financial transactions of any kind. The media report the White House that the information is in their power and expect the objections put Obama administration if it considers that in some cases put at risk the lives of people. Where appropriate, take into account their recommendations. In most cases, are ignored."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. The fools around here either willfully ignore this point or they're too lazy to read.
The Guardian UK said that it had to employ more than 50 extra people with expertise in vetting the Wikileaks documents for the last 2 months before they published some of the material.

And yes, in increments. That was their choice.

Similar precautions were taken by Der Spiegel, NYT and all others who were contacted by Wikileaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. He knows how to maintain a frame and keep a story going for more than
Edited on Sun Dec-05-10 02:10 PM by tekisui
one news cycle. The leaders of the free world are pissed that he is better at their game than they are.

I love watching the people at the top get so worked up over this. The are sweating the flow of information. They are losing their shit because they cannot stop it. BEAUTIFUL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
63. Yes it is. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
73. so the game is more important than the truth?
I thought Wikileaks was revealing these government secrets because it was important for the public to know the truth? So why is it that the most important and most devistating truths are the ones chosen to keep away from the public as Assange's personal "insurance"? Seems to me that Assange is more interested in himself than revealing important and devistating truths by doing this.

Does it not bother anyone that the most important and most devistating truths that the public should know is not likely to ever be seen by the public because it's locked up in Assange's personal "insurance" file?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
49. Do you honestly believe it woud make a difference in terms of his self-promotion..
Edited on Sun Dec-05-10 03:40 PM by girl gone mad
whether Wikileaks dumped all of the documents at once or continued to release them in a controlled fashion?

Either way, these documents, and Assange by proxy, will be a part of the collective conscience well into the future because new details and points of interest will emerge over time. The spotlight of intense public interest is unlikely to diminish as the story evolves, and it will evolve, regardless of how the data is disseminated.

You simply haven't made a coherent argument to back up this worn-out smear on Assange.

What has really put him at the top of the news for the last few days is the reaction of world leaders, including our own President and SOS. By personally attacking Assange and threatening to pursue charges against him, they are increasing his notoriety and engendering much public sympathy for him.

The real fraud I see in this story is from politicians who speak out of both sides of their mouths, claiming the leaks are insignificant and irrelevant, then moments later citing grave threats to national security to demand brutal revenge against this most public face of the leaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
69. Jesus. I really enjoyed our discussions re: the BP oil gusher. But this time you're wrong...
Pathetically wrong.

Sigh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
75. Do you have any proof that he "keeps what he wants for himself as insurance"??
There are 251,287 cables. If they were uploaded/released in one minute intervals, 24 hours a day/7 days a week, it would take 176 days to release them.

"But no, now he orchestrates the dumps, categorizes them."

And this is a problem...why? It sure makes it easier to search through them. Maybe they figured out that a mass dump hindered them in some way the last time...

Furthermore, from what I have read, the cables are all vetted for accuracy/authenticity before their release, just like everything else wikileaks has released. This takes time, too...

If it was gonna take me a while to release it all, I would have some "insurance" somewhere too..

Maybe the plan was to start out with the small stuff and build from there. Starting out with the small stuff also builds the credibilty of what's being released. Part of this plan may also be to see what kind of reaction there is around the world. If some of this lesser information resulted in investigations and/or prosecutions of guilty parties, wikileaks might not release all their files. In light of the current reaction, with Assagne now being smeared and hunted down, it seems he had a sound strategy, IMHO.

"The man is a fraud."

You couldn't be more wrong, but that's just my opinion too. Since you think he is, could you explain, in detail, how he is a "fraud"?

Thanks in advance



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. If I were him, I'd do the same thing.
He's got powerful enemies, he's pissed them off so completely that a lot of people have openly suggested killing him.

I can't say I blame him. When the stakes are high, and you're the underdog, fight dirty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
28. His "insurance" file has been distributed on PirateBay.
Edited on Sun Dec-05-10 02:14 PM by Kablooie
There are probably millions of copies on home computers all over the world.

All they have to do is release the decryption code and there's no way to prevent the whole package from being revealed.

The trigger has been cocked and the gun is pointing directly at the heads of world governments.

It sounds a little dangerous.
I hope the decryption code is safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Thanks for guiding me to Pirate Bay.
I am among those millions now. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. Why doesn't Wikileaks release all the documents to the public?
Does anyone think it odd that a select few are deciding what the public should or should not know?

Nothing changes. Everything stays the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Personally, I find protecting a human's life pretty important.
That is the type of information that is being withheld.

Also, the cables are not in the format that is being published. El Pais explains:

"Here is a description of the process from El Pais (sorry for the poor Google translation).

"A daunting task

The material to be reviewed requires a daunting task. Cables are 250,000, , many of them lengthy reports that must pass the filter of a newspaper edition in order not to endanger human life. The information is stored in plain text CSV (comma-separated English values), a lot of files stored in rows separated by commas that make the text more closely resemble an Excel file with tables, a text legible. It is essential the work of the technicians who make them analyzable documents for journalists.

With the material chosen Wikileaks newspapers to publish. No financial transactions of any kind. The media report the White House that the information is in their power and expect the objections put Obama administration if it considers that in some cases put at risk the lives of people. Where appropriate, take into account their recommendations. In most cases, are ignored."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. It would be a one day story and swept into the dustbin of history.
Another reason is because of the ham handed reaction of the governments. They are revealing to all of us that they have much to hide. Their hands are dirty, by holding back on a full document dump, key players worry and slip up. That is a big story in its own right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
39. So wikileaks isn't about open Government?
They will use info as a tool for leverage? Why don't they just release the info they have and stop playing games with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Because they do not want to be responsible for people being killed.
There is a difference between exposing government secrets and putting someone's life in jeopardy.

And, as I have explained in this thread. The documents are not in a readability format.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Not at all
IMHO Assange is deliberately trying to destabilize international diplomacy.


And fuck him for giving out false hope to victims regarding BP and Bank of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. You think he has nothing on BP or BOA?
So far, he has delivered on his previous hints.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #43
71. He's already outed banks and oilmen in other places.
Again, they’re a four-year-old organization. And they have led to all sorts of important reforms. I mean, in Iceland, WikiLeaks was basically the single-handed cause of a new law that is designed to protect whistleblowing and whistleblowing sites like WikiLeaks beyond anything else that exists in the world. Their exposure of corruption on the part of a Iceland’s biggest banks, that led to the financial meltdown, led to investigations and prosecutions. The same thing happened to exposure of injustices and corruption on the part of oil magnates in Peru. They exposed the Australian government’s efforts to target websites to be shut down under a program designed to target child pornography, when in reality the sites that were targeted were political sites. And in Spain this week, the headlines are dominated by documents that WikiLeaks released that you, Amy, covered two days ago with Harper’s Scott Horton about the fact of the Spanish government’s succumb to pressure by the American State Department not to investigate the torture of its own citizens and the death of a Spanish photojournalist in Iraq, because WikiLeaks exposed that. And so you see all over the world, in just a short history of four years, immense amounts of reforms and greater awareness of what political and financial elites are doing around the world.

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/3/is_wikileaks_julian_assange_a_hero




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. The games expose the players, their fears and the extent they will go to
to protect their dark, deadly secrets. It is a brilliant strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keepfreespeechalive Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. Dripping out the information guarantees months of media coverage
As they have previously discussed, no one pays attention when they just dump all of the information. They have released less than 1,000 out of 250,000 cables. This story is going to continue to play out for a few more months. And when they're done with the cables, they'll start on the banks. It's an ingenious strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. they're starting the banks sooner than that
they aren't waiting for all the cables to be done. The bank information starts early next year...January is my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. They are releasing what they have..
just doing it in a manner which will allow for more effective information processing and prophylactic redaction.

The insurance file is the leverage they are using for protection against government or rogue-entity inflicted harm, similar to the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iterate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. If nothing else, it takes a few days to research
and write each story. Try it, as I'm sure the press has missed some stories and some nuance. It's open government if you want it. I'm sure no one will mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knotwurstforware Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
55. Kicked and recommended
I would bet money what he has is related to sept 11, which would make it very interesting. This guy has stuff on many countries and I bet it would show inconveinent things in relation to Saudi Arabia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. no doubt. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
59. The insurance file works because the censors can imagine 1,001 things that might be in it...
that are real. They have no idea what's in it, but they know what they fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. hee hee!
:evilgrin:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
62. Bank of America
Experts at three field crop rotation.

:rofl:

I stole that line from Jon Stewart's book EARTH!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC