Precedent and Prologue- Jeffrey Toobin on the 10 anniversary of the Supremes appointing *Bush

[Mira]

by Jeffrey Toobin December 6, 2010
The New Yorker


Momentous Supreme Court cases tend to move quickly into the slipstream of the Court’s history. In the first ten years after Brown v. Board of Education, the 1954 decision that ended the doctrine of separate but equal in public education, the Justices cited the case more than twenty-five times. In the ten years after Roe v. Wade, the abortion-rights decision of 1973, there were more than sixty-five references to that landmark. This month marks ten years since the Court, by a vote of five-to-four, terminated the election of 2000 and delivered the Presidency to George W. Bush. Over that decade, the Justices have provided a verdict of sorts on Bush v. Gore by the number of times they have cited it: zero.

Both sides had their reasons for consigning the decision to history and leaving it there. In his concession speech on the day after the decision, Al Gore said simply, “It’s time for me to go.” He meant it, and he left politics for a life of entrepreneurship and good works. George W. Bush, for his part, found little reason to dwell on the controversial nature of his ascension to office, and in his memoir, “Decision Points,” he devotes less than a page to the Supreme Court decision. (“My first response was relief,” he writes of his reaction.) In public appearances, Antonin Scalia, a member of the majority in Bush v. Gore, regularly offers this message to people who question him about the decision: “Get over it!”

Even at the time, Bush v. Gore was treated as a kind of novelty item, a one-off decision that applied only to the peculiar facts then before the Justices. The majority itself seemed to want it that way. In the most famous sentence from the decision, the Justices wrote, “Our consideration is limited to the present circumstances, for the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many complexities.” (Unlike most weighty decisions, Bush v. Gore had no single author and was delineated “per curiam,” or by the Court, a designation the Justices usually reserve for minor cases.) In light of all these admonitions to leave the case be, might getting over it be the best advice?



For the whole piece go to
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2010/12/06/101206taco_talk_toobin?printable=true#ixzz17FeGpHc5

[Wolf Frankula]

1. Remember Remember The Twelfth of December

Supreme Court Treason and Plot.
I see no reason Supreme Court Treason
Should ever be Forgot.

Wolf Frankula

[Dawson Leery]

2. +1

[Mira]

3. ...

Fine Poetry.
So well done!
I might pop in the movie and kick back!

Many memories flood from that night.
The only one that makes me laugh is my 7 yr old grandson sitting on the floor, staring at TV at midnight, saying: "And I thought this was going to be boring...'

[grasswire]

4. my nephew lost his faith in America that night

He lost the idea of America as a place of justice and truth. It was a bitter revelation. He was 19.