Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I dunno. This sounds like caving to me.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:34 AM
Original message
I dunno. This sounds like caving to me.
Or cratering.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/06/us/politics/06cong.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

WASHINGTON — White House officials and Congressional Republicans said Sunday they were closing in on a deal to temporarily continue the Bush-era tax cuts at all income levels, while bitterly frustrated Democratic Congressional leaders began exploring whether they would have the votes for such a package.

A day after the Senate rejected President Obama’s preferred tax plan, officials said the broad contours of a compromise were in focus.

Rather than extending the tax rates only on income described by Democrats as middle class — up to $250,000 a year for couples and $200,000 for individuals — the deal would also keep the rates for higher earners, probably for two years. In return, Republicans said they would probably agree to extend jobless aid for the long-term unemployed.

Senior Democrats on Sunday said that they were resigned to defeat in the highly charged tax debate, and they voiced dismay.

“We’re moving in that direction,” Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat said dejectedly when Bob Schieffer, host of “Face the Nation” on CBS, asked him if the 2001 and 2003 tax rates would be extended even for the wealthy. “And we’re only moving there against my judgment,” Mr. Durbin added.

------

Perhaps a strongly worded letter is in order from the Democratic leadership in the Senate.

Jeez, could they possibly be more weak??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Democrats are pretty much entirely useless as a political party
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. It's kind of hard to live up to your self-description
as an opposition party if you don't actually oppose anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Opposition .. hell we we are the majority.
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 12:49 AM by thunder rising
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. "We" who? Who is in the majority? Not representatives of the middle class.
The ruling class is in the majority. Some are called republicans and some are called Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. You couldnt be more wrong.
They are providing a very necessary function. Without their token resistance, people might think we lived in tyranny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Useless?! Hell, the Republicans could NEVER have pulled this shit off!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Could they possibly be more weak?
No. And the Republican arguments are nonsensical. Ask Warren Buffet and Bill Gates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, no one can accuse the media of milking a talking point
Sunday shows make for great all-day spin.

Wish more of them would spotlight the points Kerry made, but those don't fit the meme.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. I watched the segment with John Kerry. I thought he was great.
Unfortunately, he's not the President.

He should be in his second term right now.

But, he quit, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. He didn't quit being a liberal, progressive, senator doing real work
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:02 PM by politicasista
He's great, but he quit? LOL! :rofl: Thanks for letting McAwful and Democrats off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
37. They're too busy screaming at him and holding on to 2004
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 09:50 PM by politicasista
It doesn't matter. The Kerry haters will still complain, that he did good, but ________________. Same with Obama everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. they're "dismayed", Steve!!!
it's all, er, "against their judgement". Sound like REAL FIGHTERS, don't they? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. At this point they have no choice. If they stand tough and say no to
lettig the rich get their tax cuts they lose the opportunity to get unemployment extended for millionns of people. If it weren't for those people, I'd be all for saying let all the damn Shrub cuts expire, but we really can't do hat to them. When the new congress convenes in Jan. Boner won't even propose anything for the unemployed or the middle class, and whatever they would propose would most likely be worse than the expired ones. They really should have had this fight months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. they're always a day late and a dollar short
*FAIL*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Stand strong and the PEOPLE WILL stand with you. If you suck nobody like you.. EVER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. It's a bluff, and the Republicans just have bigger cojones.
Boner's up for reelection in 2012 too, and there are quite a few Ohioans out of work.

Once, just once, Democrats should stick to their guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Boner doesn't GAS about the unemployed in his district. I'll tell you,
I was a buyer for a large co. for quite a few years and negotiating is quite tricky. When you set your bottom line you have to be willing to lose the deal. Granted, it's coming down to who is willing tolose...the Pubs or the Dems. Remember, the Dems have more to lose in this battle. If they refuse to agree the unemployed get nothing and the Pubs only go bac to the tax es of the Clinton years. It's not an easy decision. I sure wouldn't want to have to make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Studies have shown that if a party enters negotiations with demands
which are unrealistically high the results are better, on average, than coming in with a "reasonable" offer.

No, it's not an easy decision but one that has to be made. Clinton balanced the budget, ferchrissakes...all that's missing here is a massive PR assault and some will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. True, how is it "caving" unless you hold all the cards?
All of these caving posts presume that the votes are there for all of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:49 PM
Original message
+1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. That's it. I'm looking for a way out of the Democratic Party, which I have
been a member of for my entire voting life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Ruling Class Emergency Asset Protection and Relief Bill
K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. They don't have the votes.
They don't have the votes because they don't have the message.
They don't have the message because they allow the RW Noise machine to feed the voters nonsense.
Big FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Then let the Bush cuts expire .. at least they could do nothing when they need to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. But a lot of unemployed people are going to
become homeless or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Why are they unemployed?
If the Bush* tax cuts for the wealthy are so damn good they would not be unemployed. If we keep those same tax cuts for the wealthy there are going to be a lot more unemployed than there are now...You don't fight a cold by shooting your self in the head with a bullet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I agree with you.
And they are also unemployed because companies are sitting on vast amounts of cash and are not hiring, thus blackmailing the administration. I do not know hoe we are going to get out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. This is a class war, not a war between Demo's and Repukes.
Most, if not all, of Congress-critters belong to the ruling class. Why should we expect them to represent the middle class when they are members of the opposition class.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Yes, it is a class war
And that's the only logically consistent way to view this fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. And our president just gave the other side $800 billion of our money. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. Sunset!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. That's all I ever wanted.
Sunset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
23. Republicans would "probably agree"?
Maybe they are going to push for some additional corporate or capital gains cuts to finalize the deal.

You can't really blame a shark for being pushy when you've already thrown half your own blood in the water can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. Yup, that's what we got for caving in on this. A "probably"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. "Probably agree" = "It's a done deal, don't sweat it"
I wish I'd gone ahead and gotten my real estate license several years ago. I could've made MY fortune selling prime waterfront property -- located just a half-mile offshore from Ft. Lauderdale -- to these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. If They Are Going to Make This Mistake
Why don't they at least have something in the bill that requires those making over blah blah to contribute jobs to the US. Why don't they tax those who have moved their jobs out of the country? If they want a tax break they can bring the jobs home and forget about that third Corvette for their kid.

If this blackmail procedure by the Republicans is successful I'm through with the Democratic Party. In 2012 I'll write in the name of my neighbor's yellow dog. He's loyal to the neighborhood, he appears to know the difference between right and wrong, and he's a fighter.

We have been betrayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
31. so is Durbin going to filibuster it?
IL DUers, please call him and ask him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
33. Republicans said they would probably agree
MEANS NO, BUT THE aDMINISTRATIN DOESN'T GET IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. That is why we need to break from two party system, how many time do I have to say it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC