Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Julien Assange defense fund frozen - from Twitter:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:18 AM
Original message
Julien Assange defense fund frozen - from Twitter:
"PRESS RELEASE
Tue 7 Dec 15.55 GMT

Julian Assange Defense Fund frozen.

The Swiss Bank Post Finance today issues a press release stating that it had frozen Julian Assange's defense fund and personal assets (31K EUR) after reviewing him as a "high profile" individual.

The technicality used to seize the defense fund was that Mr. Assange, as a homeless refugee attempting to gain residency in Switzerland, had used his lawyers address in Geneva for the bank's correspondence.

Late last week, the internet payment giant PayPal, froze 60Keur of donations to the German charity the Wau Holland Foundation, which were targeted to promote the sharing of knowledge via WikiLeaks.

WikiLeaks and Julian have lost 100Keur in assets this week.

One of the most fascinating aspects of the Cablegate exposure is how it is throwing into relief the power dynamics between supposedly independent states like Switzerland, Sweden and Australia.

WikiLeaks also has public bank accounts in Iceland (preferred) and Germany.

Please help cover our expenditures while we fight to get our assets back.

http://wikileaks.ch/support.html"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Right. LIke the Big Boys haven't been
doing this for years. NOW the Swiss Bank gets morality???

"The technicality used to seize the defense fund was that Mr. Assange, as a homeless refugee attempting to gain residency in Switzerland, had used his lawyers address in Geneva for the bank's correspondence."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Dontcha love their hypocrisy? Pfft. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. You know you're persona non grata when Swiss banks don't want your money n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. UK has also issued warrant for Assange's arrest
"Same day Swiss defense fund is frozen, UK issues arrest warrant for Julian Assange"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pay up suckers.
You get the double bonus of having your money frozen by some government and the FBI watching you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another funny Wikileaks Palin Tweet:
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 12:00 PM by ProfessionalLeftist
RT @sarahpalinusa "I can see Julian Assange from my house" #wikileaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. How does that technicality work?
The technicality used to seize the defense fund was that Mr. Assange, as a homeless refugee attempting to gain residency in Switzerland, had used his lawyers address in Geneva for the bank's correspondence.

They can seize his assets because he used his lawyers address? Or was it because he used a Geneva address while trying to gain residency? Why would either of those result in the account being seized? I'm confused by this. Anyone understand the laws around this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. They only take money from international drug smugglers, arms dealers and fugitive Nazis
He should have known he didn't belong - what a bounder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. The use of underhanded schemes to disable Assange's defense does not say much for the govts' case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC