Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrea Mitchell calls Wikileaks BLACKMAIL...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:04 PM
Original message
Andrea Mitchell calls Wikileaks BLACKMAIL...
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 01:05 PM by Joanne98
The media calls what Assange is doing BLACKMAIL but not what the Republicans are doing with the tax cuts!

One of biggest parts of the Wikileaks story is HOW USELESS THE CORPORATE WHORES IN THE MEDIA ARE!

It's been so long since they practiced real journalism, they don't even know what looks like anymore!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. You are talking of a media system
that is right leaning.... (very right leaning)... and to them the leaks are a real threat to their livelihood, not because they are out there, but because they are exposing their empire.

I am sure they were told at editorial meetings to keep the iron wall going. This also means demeaning them. The Satrapies of the Empire are NOT acting that way at all. They realize this is just confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. says Mrs Alan Greenspan of someone who threatens to criticise the US financials
nice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
44. She has many reasons for taking this personally.
Better up the Ambien Mrs. Greenspan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. They're ALL characterizing him as some sort of
cyber terrorist. That "blackmail" meme will be repeated, ad nauseum, until most Americans have been "properly" indoctrinated. I honestly don't remember the last time any portion of the MSM had an original thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. But it is blackmail.
–noun 1. any payment extorted by intimidation, as by threats of injurious revelations or accusations.
2. the extortion of such payment: He confessed rather than suffer the dishonor of blackmail.
3. a tribute formerly exacted in the north of England and in Scotland by freebooting chiefs for protection from pillage.

–verb (used with object)
4. to extort money from (a person) by the use of threats.
5. to force or coerce into a particular action, statement, etc.: The strikers claimed they were blackmailed into signing the new contract.

The payoff is him not being arrested or worse. If he was honest, he'd release the entire thing and deal with the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. He intends to release it all. The pace at which it's released is all that's in question. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Blackmail for purposes of defense, in this case,
of his life, is no sin, IMO. Blackmail, like fire, is neither good nor bad. It's how you use it.

Example, If I have information that, say Herman next door, was having unprotected sex with prostitutes without his wife's knowledge and I find out, I would have no qualms (for HER safety) blackmailing him with the following: "If you don't inform your wife of your activities yourself, *I'll* tell her." If I tell him, "Pay me $20,000 or I'm telling your wife." That TOO is blackmail. It all depends on how you use it and right now, he's using it, LITERALLY, as leverage for his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good little defender of Empire, she.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. who? Mrs. Greenspan?..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. It is blackmail.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. When you're blackmailing someone, you usually keep the info secret
You know...that's how you get them to pay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Part of the info is being kept secret.
Remember the "insurance?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. He intends to release it all. Only thing in question here is the pace at which it's all released. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. How would you characterize our "democratic" governments actions and threats against wikileaks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Predictable
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yep. Predictabley fearful of the people knowing what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. It is not
In order to blackmail someone, you have to demand something in exchange for not going through with the threat.

Has Assange demanded anything?

The ONLY way this could be considered blackmail is if the intent is to murder Assange, in which case the something demanded is his ability to continue breathing (IMO not a terribly unreasonable demand, but Andrea Greenspan's opinion may of course differ).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. He demanded freedom from arrest or death
So yes, he fits the criteria you set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Under what law would he be arrested?
He's not a US citizen and US law does not apply to him.

One trumped-up misdemeanor sex charge that is an obvious frame-up is just an excuse for governments to take custody (and likely torture him). So if one is "blackmailing" for one's own just freedom and life, that hardly qualifies as blackmail. A more proper word is "detente".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. That would require a quid pro quo...what is Assange squeezing them for? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Freedom from arrest
or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. he has said that if he is taken into custody he will dump
his "thermo-nuclear attack".

So, in effect he's saying that he will not be answerable to anyone.

And people right here on DU are ok with that.

:shrug:

The man must be god.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. Ah, the 'insurance' files.
Got it. Freedom is different than threatening to destroy the global economy with international finance fraud.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. no, I got it, it's only wrong when "they" do it-
if it suits your personal agenda, anything goes?

Your argument that disapproving of Assange's tactics means you support the wrongs being done in the world is just plain stupid.

"yer either with us, or yer with the terrists" comes to mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. No, that's not my argument, My argument would be...
if you REALLY can ruin the global economy, the powers of the world will kiss your ass. If you aren't then when you embarrass the Patrons of Power, you will be hunted down more vigorously than the hunt for Bin Laden's funding and logictical sources.

So far I haven't seen anything that directly endangers the physical safety of Americans, the American Military, America's military allies in the field or legitimate friends of America.

There certainly ARE things that show that MANY state players act like 8th graders. And 8th graders in charge of the world IS CERTAINLY SCARY, and some people in some places simply won't tolerate that.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Ah, you are surprised I speak your language, eh?"
In other contexts, it would be called extortion, "hard bargaining", or a "credible threat".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Wonder if she calls TARP blackmail. What did they threaten us with? Martial law, wasn't it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Actually, I agree...
Assange is saying that if he's arrested, additional material will be released. If he believes the material should be made public, why is this at all contingent on his legal situation? If he doesn't believe the material should be made public, why is he willing to release it for the sake of his own security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Mrs Alan Greenspan would be up in arms about exposure of the banksters' criminal activities.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Let the slander and character assassination campaign against Assange continue!

The "swiftboaters" can take lessons from those media news readers and millionaire hacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. And it's working so well. Worldwide, I wonder who is more believed. Assange or the US government?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Assange is using coercian/blackmail. So are the Republicans-
what she says isn't wrong. But it IS selective.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. You are talking about Congress, which has power that is legitimate
and comparing it with something not comparable - someone who is violating our classified documents (or helping to do so).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. I consider a free press to have legitimate power. So did the founders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. LOL. Of course, our government's threats and actions against him are merely fatherly advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. What did she call what her husband did to the US economy
Fucking it up???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. Self defense is not blackmail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. his threat to release if taken into custody isn't "self-defense".
The death threats are a different matter. But he has stated that if they arrest him, the dump will happen. That's blackmail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. The release will happen anyway. It'll just happen sooner if he's arrested or killed.
He'd prefer to release the information in a more orderly fashion so it can be assimilated well. But I'm sure he set a lot of it up on dead man's switches a while back to keep it from being lost if something happens to him.

I would have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disillusioned73 Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. As expected, the corporate media is..
making Assange the story - all the while the leaked document aren't being covered. Genious, and the lemmings drool on themselves as they watch the tube...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
32. One of biggest parts of the Wikileaks story is...
"One of biggest parts of the Wikileaks story is HOW USELESS THE CORPORATE WHORES IN THE MEDIA ARE!"

Bingo !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. I agree. Wikileaks makes the media look like impotent fatuous idiots
which they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. Wikileaks has got something on hubby Greenspan n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frisbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
42. Do they even TEACH real journalism anymore?
I really wonder what they are teaching in journalism school these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC