Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman Demands Senate Stay In Session Through The Holiday To Repeal DADT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:07 PM
Original message
Lieberman Demands Senate Stay In Session Through The Holiday To Repeal DADT
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 01:15 PM by cal04
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/12/06/lieberman-holiday-repeal-dadt/

Despite comprehensive support to overturn the military’s DADT policy, Republican lawmakers have manufactured a catalogue of objections to its repeal. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) articulated the latest excuse yesterday on NBC’s Meet the Press, claiming other “controversial items” in the defense authorization bill — like expanding reproductive health services on military bases — prevent the Senate from having enough time to debate and “finish” the bill “before the end of next year.” Now, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) is calling the GOP’s bluff on process objections and demanding the Senate stay in session until the bill is passed because, as his spokewoman told The Hill, “wanting to go home is not an acceptable excuse”:

Lieberman, a key Senate proponent of repealing the military’s ban on openly gay or lesbian members, doesn’t want the chamber to adjourn until it’s acted on a defense authorization bill that contains a provision to do away with the policy.

“Senator Lieberman believes that there are at least 60 votes to repeal ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ this year, provided that leadership allows time for sufficient debate and amendments,” Lieberman spokeswoman Erika Masonhall said. “Wanting to go home is not an acceptable excuse for failing to pass a bill that provides essential support for our troops and veterans and failing to take action that the president, the secretary of Defense, and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have called for.”

The senator also appeared to endorse Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart’s demand that the Senate stay in session in a tweet on Monday.

The Senate’s continued refusal to pass the defense bill this year marks the first time Congress failed to do so in 48 years. Such a miscarriage of responsibility would not only jeopardize a well-supported repeal of DADT, but vital support for servicemembers. But by forcing Repulbican lawmakers to stay through the holiday, the Wonk Room’s Igor Volsky notes that Democrats would send a clear message that says, “if you can’t compromise on a fair and reasonable time frame and insist on a completely open debate structure, then that’s what we’ll have 24 hours a day until the very day the new Congress is sworn in.”


Lieberman wants Senate to stay in session until it repeals 'Don't ask' policy
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/132129-lieberman-wants-senate-to-stay-in-session-until-it-repeals-dont-ask-dont-tell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for him! I'd like to hear that from Reid, too! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree with you, Gately; however,
I would prefer they be forced to stay in session for issues that impact the majority! Do NOT blast me...I am on board with the repeal of DADT, anything having to do with dumbass laws regarding our LGTB brothers/sisters. I also want we "little" folks to be addressed.

I love your posts, btw. :hug:

Jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Oh, I totally agree (about being forced to stay in session for
issues that affect the masses), but they don't seem to feel that's important. If we could pick and choose, wouldn't that be nice? But wow, to see the Senate move on ANYTHING is encouraging! And this is a big issue and the RIGHT thing to do (although I'm sure that's not what's motivating him), that it will be a relief to get this accomplished so it's one more thing off the list and we can focus on others (in theory :7).

It sure gets frustrating, doesn't it?

:pals:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommend!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. where's a fucking democrat? does it take an independent to speak for the dems?
pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. And An Independent That Nobody Here Likes At That
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree and it will pass.
Because the critters will want to flee for the holiday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC