DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:11 PM
Original message |
Don't We Have At Least Five Republicans Who Will Vote To Repeal DADT |
|
Scott Brown Olympia Snowe Susan Collins George Voinovich Lisa Murkowkski
|
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Here's the catch, though--they might only agree to vote for it if they |
|
extract yet another concession that's unacceptable to Democrats. Or, hell, they might just change their minds--either to thwart Obama's agenda or under threat from Turtle Man and McLame.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. How Many Dems We Will Lose Beside Mark Pryor? |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I was not aware that ANY Dems would defect. Hadn't heard that about Pryor. |
|
But I expect some shenanigans from the GOPers, nonetheless--no matter what they personally believe or what their constituents want. Susan Collins already said she won't vote for it unless her conditions were met (can't remember what they were).
|
justiceischeap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Her condition was Bush tax cuts extended... (eom) |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Thanks--well, she'll get her wish, but who knows what else will happen |
vi5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Here's the flaw with what you described.... |
|
You wrote "another concession that's unacceptable to democrats". That's a ridiculous statement. There are no concessions that are unacceptable to Democrats. They'll concede until they're blue in the face. Hell, they'll find concessions that the other side didn't even know they want conceded and they'll concede them.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Not Much I Wouldn't Trade To Get Justice For My Gay Brothers And Sisters |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Heh. That may be true. |
donco6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. That was the point of my OP on the Greatest page. |
|
But you said it more plainly.
|
AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No. They Always Fall into the Repiglickin' Lockstep When It Matters |
johnaries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-06-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
12. President McCain will never allow it, though |
|
So fuhgeddaboudit. However, if it suits the Democrats to trade something away for the empty promise of repealing DADT, the Republicans will be quite happy to see something else negotiated away that they can't stand.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message |