Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So In The End... Obama's Deal Sells Out Half The Unemployed So The Rich Get Their Way ???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:54 PM
Original message
So In The End... Obama's Deal Sells Out Half The Unemployed So The Rich Get Their Way ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KILL THE WISE ONE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. yup .... the unemployment extension does not even last as long as the tax cut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So How Was Obama Held Hostage Over The Unemployed ???
If he was gonna screw 'em over anyway, why not fight the bastards?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nope. You don't have that right. Curious: What do you say about those who want to sell out ...
the unemployed IN FULL...by opposing this deal and, therefore, ensuring there will be no UI extension at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Ok... Ya Got Me... They Save UI For 2 Million (for 13 months), And Let 4 Million Go Homeless...
There... is that better?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Slasher kabuki.
A new genre for a new uniquely american century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. No Unemployment benefits were extended for over 6 Million
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. I'm Not Exactly Sure What You Mean, But No...
That chart goes with this story, and it's entitled:

4 Million Americans Set To Lose Unemployment Benefits Even If Congress Passes Extension (CHART)

Chart here:



Story here:

Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-benefits-99ers-obama_n_791682.html

:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. But 6.7 million have it extended for a year.
You were claiming that the extention only benefited 2 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. No Man (Not Trying To BAD Here), But...
Listen to the President's remarks... he spoke of 2 Million of the Unemployed getting Benefits for the next 13 months. That takes us into 2012.

The people on the chart, are those that will lose their benefits over 2011:

A senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the White House is now focused on trying to persuade Congress to reauthorize the existing emergency unemployment program, which would protect 6.7 million unemployed workers from losing their checks over the next year. (See the below chart from the CEA's report.)



Given that even this goal is now uncertain, seeking yet another program for the four million jobless people at risk of exhausting emergency assistance seems futile, the official said.


That's why I kept thinking, "Huh?" every time he mentioned 2 Million Unemployed. I thought, that number's not right. Now I understand.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. I don't remember what the President said
but the chart seems pretty clear and goes through November of 2011. And since we're still in 2010 a 13 month extention only goes to January of 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I say make the Republicans Do It On National TV.
Plenty of the unemployed are Republicans.

And: If they Do do it, use the increased revenue from the rich to just fucking hire them working for the Federal Government... it's a better use of the money anyway.

There, I developed a better set of policies and contingencies in five minutes than the White House... You're Welcome. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
26. Well said nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. The crisis for this "compromise" has bipartisan engineering written all over it. (nt)
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:02 PM by whatchamacallit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Bipartisan implies working with Dems too.
We're past that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. bwwwwwwwwwa ha ha ha ha
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. That would be a yes- you are correct.
Obama is selling out the budget to save some of the unemployed... which will probably be a good thing for all the government employees that he will have to fire to finance the extension of tax cuts for the rich.

It's known as a win-win, in foldy-town. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. SO in the end, WillyT,
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 10:05 PM by FrenchieCat
Were you willing to sell out the unemployed at full force,
just so the rich didn't get their way?
Was that the way your priority was ordered?

And if so, why is your "full sell out" a better position?

Are you now "Concerned" about the deficit, like the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Let Me Tell You About Numbers And Principle...
A guy says to an attractive lady, "Would you sleep with me for 10 million dollars?

The lady frowns, but says, "I don't know... I'd have to think about that."

Then the guy says, "Would you sleep with me for 10 dollars?"

The lady, visibly upset says, "Sir, what kind of a woman do you take me for ?"

The man then says, "I know what kind of a woman you are, we're just negotiating price."


So... It would have been OK with you if he had saved 500,000 Unemployed, but let 5.5 million go?

I mean c'mon... he saved UI for 500,000 !!!

See how that works... or doesn't?

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. deleted
Edited on Tue Dec-07-10 12:28 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
i'm too tired to fashion a cogent response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Well Then... You Have Principles...
Congratulations!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. The extension for tax cuts for the rich will cost more than the unemployment... so
how about Obama gets creative, calls the Republicans, and then— if they DO cut the unemployment... Obama can just open an executive department Office of Hiring the Unemployed... and let those culled from the unemployment rolls come and apply for jobs... ?? Batta Boom, Botta Bing— unemployed still get their monies and the Federal Budget winds up in better shape than before.

Problem solved. ;)

(Or, Captain Capitulation can carry on his campaign of Crumblation...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I Like That One A Lot !!!
Take the money from the expired tax cuts and use it to fund Direct Government Jobs.

That would TOTALLY piss off the GOP... and make me a happy man, while providing good paying well-benefited jobs, and stimulating the economy.

Genius!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. So in thirteen months, the Republicans will say...
...in exchange for privatizing SS, we will let you eat cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. So in thirteen months, the Republicans will say...
...in exchange for privatizing SS, we will let you eat cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. So people are advocating for and against the deal?
If this deal is killed the other half are sold out too. If this gets push to the next Congress, the Republican-controlled House will have no problem leaving unemployment benefits by the wayside.

Can't have it both ways. The deal isn't done yet, and maybe the House and Senate can expand on the terms.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I'm sure you will be all for the deal, whatever its terms may be.
Whatever it may be, it will be the best that it could ever have been, so it will be worth supporting, because it is as good as it gets, because that's all it is, or ever could have been...?

Wow, you will be right when it is time to be right, as you are always right, because to be other than right is to be disloyal... and that you are not, because it would not be right.

Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Nailed that one, for sure. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
35. I'm for it now,
good guess. The tax cuts for the rich suck, but unless Democrats can get a better package through the Senate, these are the breaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. They are getting a 13 month extension...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Not The 99ers That Expired Nov. 30th... Just The 2 Million Currently In Extension...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. Nope. You don't have it right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Really... What About The 99ers ???
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
29. Yes, you have it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
32. And best of all, we get to do this shit AGAIN in 2 years!!!!
But the UE people, you only get 1 year. Who knows what the Republicans will extort from Obama and the Dems next year and the year after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
33. Arithmatic.
$1.4 trillion ($700 billion per year) tax relief for the wealthiest in return for $18 billion over one year for some of the the long term unemployed. The tax savings will be hoarded and used to buy distressed assets under rational management.

Great deal. Sarcasm smilie here.

I have never received unemployment, social security, etc in 58 years but have no work and my health is not good and insurance for me has not been affordable since a 2001 divorce. At least I have little debt -- only a payment system for a unexpected hospitalization Spring 2010 without insurance -- because my business bank called my credit line (with nothing in arrears but causing cascading credit problems)in 2007 and I cashed out my stable business in response to get to zero debt.

Obama's economic policies are for Wall Street, Globalists, and the safely wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC